Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History the islamic world
History the islamic world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History the islamic world
In order to find out whether there was an Islamic state before ‘Abd al‐Malik or only after he became the caliph in A.D. 685, we first have to define ’state’ and what makes it particularly Islamic. This essay will use the definition by Donner, namely that the state should ’rest on a concept of legal authority’, hold the power to execute force superior to the power of any other actor, and have ’some institutional structure’. Institutions needed for these purposes are ’a governing group’, ’an army and police’, ’a judiciary’, and ’a tax administration’. If we can find all these factors in place in particular time, we can say that at that time there was a state. (Donner 1986)
What then does it mean for a state to be Islamic? It is highly contestable whether it is even justified to use the term ’Islamic state’, since the idea of ’state’ is overwhelmingly Western and does not fit in the Islamic conception of politics and government. (Ayubi [n.d.]) However, for the sake of convenience this essay will use a simple definition which is satisfactory for our purposes: for a state to be Islamic ’the ideological basis of the state… [has to be] in some organic way related to the religion of Islam.’ (Donner 1986)
This essay will now proceed to examine the conditions under the rule of ’Abd al-Malik and his predecessors. In light of our evidence it will become clear that the Islamic state was formed by ’Abd al-Malik and that before him there was something better described as ’a loose confederation of Arab tribes’. (Johns 2003)
Under the rule of ’Abd al-Malik the army was professionalised, which was an important part of an Arabic polity moving towards an Islamic state. (Robinson 2005) It is clear that armed forces of some kind existed before ’Abd...
... middle of paper ...
...ards Islamic state. Common language meant more unified and centralised state.
Mu’awiya (A.D. 661-680) tried to form a state, more spesifically a monarchy. He claimed to have political control by, among other things, introducing a new coin, which didn’t have a cross on it. However, he was forced to withdraw it because of the Christian community’s disapproval. (Hoyland 2006) This failure does not only clearly show Mu’awiya’s inability to control the population of his area, but since he had to so strongly take into account the opinions of Christian minority, his unsuccesfulness in building particularly Islamic state.
’Abd al-Malik, only couple decades later, was however very succesfull in introducing a new type of coinage.
In conclusion, in this essay I examined the conditions and structures of an early Islamic period in search for an emergence of Islamic state.
Livingston, John W., and Al-Jabarti. "The Rise of Shaykh al-Balad 'Ali Bey al-Kabir: A Study in
Ansary, Mir Tamim. Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World through Islamic Eyes. New York: PublicAffairs, 2009. Print.
Ibn Munqidh, Usama. "From Memoirs." McNeill, William and Marilyn Robinson Waldman. The Islamic World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973. 184-206.
Print. Doak, Robin. Empire of the Islamic World. Rev. ed.
The formation of states and political legitimacy has most of the time been intertwined with the religious authority that resided in the state. In Christian Europe, the church was the initial source of legitimacy post-Roman Empire. The rise and fall (and rise again) of the Catholic church and the Protestant Reformation help shaped state structures and ultimately, the rise of the secular state. In contrast, in Dar-al-Islam, there was a unique and changing relationship between the state and the ulamas because politics and religion was more or less in the same realm. In some instances, the state and ulamas remained relatively separate but in other cases, the ulamas became the
Hilāl, ʻAlī Al-Dīn. Islamic Resurgence in the Arab World. New York, NY: Praeger, 1982. Print.
Ayoob, M. (2007) The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam & Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: U of Chicago, 1982. Print.
Throughout his life, the Prophet Muhammad proved to be exceptionally adept at uniting diverse groups, negotiating a series of alliances and loyalty arrangements that spanned religious, tribal, ethnic, and familial lines (Berggren 2009). Among other things, this ability enabled Muhammad to forge a shared identity and found a nascent Islamic state from a diverse and even heterogeneous community (Rahman 1982; Ernst 2003, pp. 87-93). This diversity proved to be both a source of strength and conflict for Islam, and following the death of Muhammad early Islamic communities engaged in extensive debates not only about the nature of his teachings or how to carry his legacy forward, but also about the terms that should be used to define his authority. Although this debate produced a colorful array of movements within the tapestry of early Islamic civilization, this essay offers a critical examination of two particularly distinct perspectives on the nature of prophetic authority: namely, those articulated
He presents the themes and elements of the pre-Islamic society, including its tribal culture, economic culture, religious background, prominence of poetry (how the Qur’an situates itself in relation to the poetry of the “Jahileen”), and discusses gender issues (particularly infanticide of daughters). Moreover, he introduces the connection between Abraham and Muhammad which is identified as the “cornerstone to the Islamic tradition” (84), situating it relative to other monotheistic religions. Through these elements Safi notes that pre-Islamic Arabia shaped the ways in which “Islamic discourses and practices expressed themselves” (53) thus providing the “the context of Islamic practices”
Political uprisings in the Middle East, especially in Muslim nation states have placed Arabian politics back on the focus point of international politics. Political events in certain Arab countries had an excessive impact on the political development of other neighboring states. Resistances and anxieties within different Arab countries triggered unpredictable actions, sometimes sorely to observe and believe. The authoritarian governments of Arabian countries led from various dictators have created a precarious situation for their people, especially in providing national security and maintaining peace in the region. Jack Goldstone argues that the degree of a sultan’s weakness has been often only visible in retrospect; due in part to the nature of the military-security complex common across Middle East states (Goldstone 1). In addition, the existence of various statesmen with political affiliation is concerned in faithfulness of its armed forces. Usually, the armed national forces of several states, mainly those in Arab countries are loyal and closely affiliated to their leaders, which have a major role in state regimes. Arab uprisings in their early spreading appeared legally responsible and with concrete demands from representatives’ peoples, calling for a more open democratic system and reasonable governance. Even though, the system in which popular frustration with government imposes alters considerably from one state to another. These public revolts against different authoritative governments didn’t halt just in Arab states, but they sustained also in the Far East and in the Eastern Europe. Can we say that the popular uprisings in Arab countries could be attributed to the term of globalization? In fact, globalization is a multi...
G. Esposito, John L (2002) Islam; What Everyone Should Know. New York. Oxford University Press Inc.
“Are political Islam and democracy compatible?” This question has been troubling both Muslims and non-Muslims living in East and West for a long time now. Contemporary Islamic political thought has become deeply influenced by attempts at reconciling Islam and democracy. Muslim thinkers who deal with political debates cannot disregard the significance of the democratic system, as it is the prevailing theme of modern western political thought. Hence, it is necessary for any alternative political system, whether it is religious or secular, to explore its position with regards to democratic government. In fact, a large literature and media publications have developed over the last century on this heated discourse of democracy versus Islam. While many argue that Islam has all the ingredients of modern state and democratic society, many other reject the phenomena “modernism” and “democracy” as a whole because of their “foreign nature”—alien to “Islamic values”. For Islamists and modernists, the motivation for such effort to either embrace or reject democracy often is to remove suspicion about the nature and goals of Islamic movements and Islamic revivalism or resurgence. But before diving into this discourse, one needs to understand the definition and origins of “democracy.” Although purely a Western ideology in its origin, there is no consensus on the definition of “democracy” as a political system. The Oxford English Dictionary describes democracy as: “A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives” (“democracy, n.”). In my paper, I will examine whether or not democracy and Sunni political Islam are compatible through the eyes of three revolutionary Sun...
During Muhammad’s time, he united many areas in Arabia and was able to establish a religious communi...
After the advent of Islam, Imam Malik’s grandfather had settled in Madinah, eventhough they were belonged to the royal Arab family from Yemen. During his childhood, Malik was brought up in a