Analysis Of 'It Is Immoral Watching The Super Bowl'

1336 Words3 Pages

In the essay (It is Immoral watching the Super Bowl) the author 's argument was very effective. Steve stated his point of views very clearly to the viewers to understand and the reasons football is immoral to watch. Almond 's reasons for writing this article is to persuade people on the immorality of football and the negative effect it has on a player, while playing or after they had played it. In this article, Almond also provided some basic facts and details about what football does to the human body. Moreover, Almond stated that medical research had proven that football can cause serious brain injury. The author was also opened minded, knowledgeable and confident. Base on the other ways of presenting this argument, I have been convinced by his argument and I am going to …show more content…

As a child, Almond was so in love with football until the accident that took place in 1978, doing the pre-season game, when the wide receiver for the New England Patriots name Stingley lost his balance, while lunging for a pass and got hit by Tatum, an Oakland Raiders. After getting hit really hard Stingley fell on the field. This whole scene was sad and it causes the audience to respond emotionally. For Example, when the team doctors rush on the field to rescue Darryl Stingley, he was not able to shake or move his body. Those who came to his rescue, begin to use reflex hammers on his knees while he lying down on the field. The longer Stingley lay on the ground the more embarrassed and guilty shame Tatum fan made of him. Even the fan knew that the interest or pleasure of American football was all about the feeling and excited of such hurt, damage transactions of football. On the other hand, Jack Tatum and his fan were happy and satisfy that he had caused damage and harm to Stingley while protecting the area or space to central his mystique position. His feeling and commitment to such played was flashy with

Open Document