Don T Let Kids Play Football By Dr. Omalu

912 Words2 Pages

Damaging the Future A parents worst fear is to have something tradgic happen to their child, especially if it was something that was caused by a sport, such as football. “Don’t Let Kids Play Football” is an article that is warning parents and children about the dangers of playing high contact sports. In the article published in The New York Times, Dr. Bennet Omalu, a physician who diagnosed CTE shares research that shows the long term effects of high impact sports and discusses the possibilities of brain damage. ”Don’t Let Kids Play Football” is rhetorically persuasive because Dr. Omalu uses moral duty to appeal to audience’s emotions and uses evidence to support the research on CTE.

Dr. Omalu’s findings in “Don’t Let Kids Play Football” …show more content…

Omalu uses numerous examples of pathos in his article. Dr. Omalu states “Depending on the severity of the condition, the child now has a risk of manifesting symptoms of C.T.E. like major depression, memory loss, suicidal thought and actions, loss of intelligence as well as dementia later in life” (Omalu, 2015). This is an effective use of pathos because it puts the audience in a situation where they see a loved one experiencing depression or memory loss. These are just a few of the many consequences that are possible for those who engage in these kind of physical activities. This can also have a large impact on the families of those who are suffering from one of these symptoms. Dr. Omalu also use pathos by appealing to the moral duty of the audience by asking the question “are we endangering that child? “(Omalu, 2015). As humans we all have a set moral that we follow in everyday life. These ethics are used as standards to define the boundaries of what is acceptable for humane society.
What is ethos? Ethos is credibility of the persuader.” Dr. Omalu was the first to publish findings of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in American football.” Which makes Dr. Omalu a very credible source. He also is a Nigerian American physician, forensic pathologist, and a neuropathologist. Makes it certain that he Dr.Omalu knows what he’s talking about when he stated, ” In more than 30 years of looking at normal brain cells in the microscope, I have yet to see a neuron that naturally creates …show more content…

Omalu makes a valid argument about why children should not be allowed to play football. He has done many years of research and has found many findings about how these contact sports are harmful to everyone who participates in them. He gives valuable information that parents, and guardians should take into consideration before they let their child play football or any contact sports. He clearly uses rhetorical tools to help make his case, and overall he is very effective as a writer. If an age restriction were to be put into force, it would eliminate the amount of head traumas and other head related injuries that children are getting today, and can prevent future issues from occurring. Though this may seem unreasonable to some, it is something that should be put into effect in order to prevent these traumas for occurring. Even though he was not successful in convincing parents and guardians of letting the child play football it was still a very well written and detailed article. Many people should take what Dr. Omalu has to say into great consideration in order to prevent more tragedies from happening. It has important information that really conveys the dangers of football, which makes “Don’t Let Kids Play Football” rhetorically

Open Document