Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review on employee empowerment
Literature review on employee empowerment
Discuss empowerment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature review on employee empowerment
Today’s employees have a longing to have a voice in the decisions that they make day in a day out. Management’s move from primary decision maker to that of a facilitator is a process that is recognized as employee empowerment. Employee empowerment can be described as being a push of the authority to make decisions down to the frontline employees. Rather than responding to the orders they are given, these employees accomplish results by taking personal responsibility of their duties. “Cultures that support empowerment encourage managers to be facilitators, catalysts, coaches, developers and enablers of others rather than just decision making authorities” (McCrimmon Ph.D., 2011). In today’s business age, organizations are looking for the extra edge to allow them to outperform their competitors and to gain market share. An important factor in direct correlation to an organization’s performance is employee productivity. So, the next question most of us ask is “How can I improve employee productivity?” There are many businesses today that believe in the philosophy that by empowering employees it will improve productivity and also provide other benefits. This philosophy is based on the theory that when employees are empowered to take control and make decisions, they deem themselves more capable, confident, and determined to work more effectively and efficiently. As a result of these business practices, staff become much more productive. In order to solidify your understanding of why companies choose to embrace employee empowerment, you must first realize the benefits associated with employee empowerment. Let us take a closer look at some of the positive impacts that empowering employees can have on an organization’s productivity, ... ... middle of paper ... ...leadership style is both: Participative and Delegative Participative leaders accept input from one or more group members when making decisions and solving problems, but the leader retains the final say when choices are made. Group members tend to be encouraged and motivated by this style of leadership. This style of leadership often leads to more effective and accurate decisions, since no leader can be an expert in all areas. Input from group members with specialized knowledge and expertise creates a more complete basis for decision-making. Delegative leaders allow group members to make decisions. This style is best used in situations where the leader needs to rely on qualified employees. The leader cannot be an expert in all situations, which is why it is important to delegate certain tasks out to knowledgeable and trustworthy employees. (About.com Psychology.)
The concept of empowering within an organization is vital to its survival. Within my organization I would say that empowering would be at three. This is more than likely a temporary situation, as we are experiencing dramatic change and uncertainty during the merger and restructuring. After the dust settles, and a sense of normalcy returns, I believe as an organization, we will be once again at a level four. Creating a sense of ownership and voice, one needs to feel autonomous, valued, and in control of their surroundings (Keys, 2009). In a world of continued chaos and change, the strongest and lasting ideas most often come from the ground up (Laureate Education, 2010a). It is the clinical staff and future leaders that are the foundation of an organization. Through transformational leadership we support and encourage the followers to think outside the box, to exceed the standards, and to work collectively to achieve a common goal (Grossman & Valiga, 2009b). Leaders need to encourage staff to become active participants within their surroundings, self empowerment, and to be accountable. This is achieved by actively participating on com...
Companies say they empower their employees and communities to do more or be better. What does that truly mean? According to The World Bank (2015), “Empowerment is the process of increasing the capacity of individuals or groups to make choices and to transform those choices into desired actions and outcomes” (para 1). Lowe’s introduced a program in 2014 to develop its women leaders, pairing vice presidents with women store managers to develop and expand Lowe’s leadership team. In 2015, the company will leverage the program with a new group of store managers and launch a new mentoring program to pair women and minority store managers with market directors
An organization that empowers its employee shows that they trust and care about their workers wellbeing or that they value their work. Empowering nurses can be a way to increase nurse satisfaction, thereby improving patient care. The research shows that one of the factors that influence job satisfactions among workers, leadership position and empowerment ( Morrison, Jones & Fuller, 1997).In the future, if interventions are designed that allow for empowering various category of nursing personnel as well as having respective influence of leadership style, may be a better strategy and it can also have greater influence on affecting nurses attitude and job satisfaction. ( Morrison, Jones & Fuller,
Belbin, M. (2007) Managing through empowerment: Getting the most out of teamwork Day, The Daily Telegraph, 11, p.004
A leader can affect change in the work group simpler (Boseman, 2008). As a leader, individuals will certainly listen to your concepts and follow the instructions.
Leadership can take many different forms, depending on the person and the situation in which it is needed. Collaborative leadership is a leadership style in which a leader brings together a large group of people, with a variety of backgrounds, to make a productive decision and act upon it. According to Chrislip and Larson (1994):
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
You show sensitivity to individual team members ' needs. This leadership style is best when tasks are repetitive or stressful.
There are three types of leaders which include delegative, directive, and participative. Leaders that listen more than speaking and are interested in allowing others direct the movement of the conversation are delegative. Directive leaders provide others with instructions and what is expected of them, how they are to complete the task, and a time frame for when the work should be finished. When a leader requests others to take part in the means and ways of getting work completed, they are using a participative style. After participating in the leadership role for my group, I have discovered that I am a delegative leader. As a leader, I like to include team members in the decision making process. I like to receive ideas, feedback, and suggestions from team members. As a leaders, I expect my followers to make an effort in solving problems on their own. I like to think that as a leader, that I have the final say with the help of the group
Throughout my life, I have been fortunate to have many opportunities to take on leadership roles, and to use these roles to influence others in very positive ways. After taking the leadership quizzes or survey, I was able to determine that my personal leadership style is Participative. Participative style is the leadership style where a leader gives team the opportunity to wholly take part in
An example of a company that found success by giving employees autonomy is a start-up company by the name of Bellhops. Bellhops allows employees to make their own schedules, choose the people they would like to work with, and even allows them to turn down a job. Additionally, in part of these liberating policies they have had an increase of employees from 2,000 to 10,000. Therefore, autonomy theory style management has really been a success for the Bellhops company and their employees are very satisfied (INC.).
Employee empowerment can be a powerful tool. The leadership style can increase efficiency and effectiveness inside an organization. Empowerment can also increase productivity and allow managers more tim...
Empowerment is another feature of post bureaucracy. It represents organizations awarding power and authority to those lower in the organizational hierarchy (Knights & Willmott, 2007). To some extent empowerment could be beneficial to a organization because empowerment would allow the workers to work...
For example, a well-structured group with a weak leader-member relationship would benefit from someone who uses a relational and oriented leadership approach. Groups who are already structured and task-oriented would not require additional structure or directives to accomplish a goal, yet they could benefit from the leader who makes them feel a part of a team. Conversely, groups or teams that do not have a structure or a strong leader-member relationship could benefit from the structure and discipline provided by a task oriented leader. Overall, the decision should ultimately be determined by the overall needs of the group or team that needs to be
Thus, to be effective in the empowerment process, empowerment requires that managers and staff members, who play a critical and essential role in the entire empowerment process, must define their empowerment, not assume or guess at their roles. Managers should never permit ambiguity about the power or its exercise. The consequences of its expression (both positive and negative) should also be clearly defined at the outset of the empowered relationship between managers and staff (Rapp, et al., 2006; Porter, 1998). The core of employee empowerment process is: show people what they have to know, teach them how to do it, give them the tools they need, and they will do a job that will meet, and often exceed, expectations. The key words here are "show," "teach" and "give." So if you want empowered employees, you have to prepare them for the job. This means that empowerment is a process of things linked with each other to form empowerment at the end (Gresham,