Analysis Of Prosperity By Nell Irvin Painter

1300 Words3 Pages

Teddy Roosevelt was Vice President of the United States when President McKinley was assassinated in 1901, leaving Roosevelt as the youngest U.S. President ever. Politically it was a time of progressivism and change, but like all past affairs, things can get lost or interpreted differently by different people. It’s not just about Roosevelt, it 's about the people responsible for shaping America during the time of his presidency. This is evident in the two excerpts, “Prosperity” by Nell Irvin Painter in her political history Standing at Armageddon and Kolko’s “Roosevelt as Reformer”, from his political history Triumph of Conservatism. Although they are both political histories of the time during Roosevelt’s presidency, they have sharply contrasting components, such as a use of …show more content…

Different people have a different spin on what really happened or their interpretation of the events that occurred, and since we each have our own set of biases and knowledge that we bring into our interpretations, no two accounts of history will be exactly the same. We can easily see this in Kolko and Painter’s excerpts. Painter is all about the people, how they shaped America, their likes, dislikes, what they wanted, and this shines through in her work. She even tells us in the preface that is what her work is all about, “This is mostly a hybrid political- labor history, but it also pays attention to social changes…” (Painter, xiii). Painter was not lying, all of chapter 6 focuses on the people. It talks about their social, economic, and political problems/ ideas/ aspirations in the beginning, and when something major happens, like the labor strikes, and trusts. With the labor strikes, she tells us why they struck and the struggles they faced (mostly employers and the government), and why they disliked trusts and their efforts to quell the corruptness and injustices brought on them by big

Open Document