Pros And Cons Of Transhumanism

758 Words2 Pages

Transhumanism is the belief or theory that the human race can evolve beyond its current physical and mental limitations, especially by means of science and technology. (CITE?)
Transhumanism does not have a place in this world. There are many people supporting the movement, saying it is a good thing for society and it will help the human race to move forward. Transhumanism needs close surveillance because without regulation, it could take over the world. If transhumanism proceeds, robots will actually take over the world. Equality, human feeling, and humanity as a whole will be lost if transhumanism continues to grow.
“The first victim of transhumanism might be equality.” (CITE) Equality is one of the most important founding principals …show more content…

In his essay, American Philosopher, Francis Fukuyama says, “our good characteristics are intimately connected to our bas ones: if we weren’t violent and aggressive, we wouldn’t be able to defend ourselves; if we didn’t have feelings of exclusivity, we wouldn’t be loyal to those close to us; if we never felt jealousy, we would also never feel love.” (CITE) Feeling is an essential ingredient in making humans who they are. Transhumans, or metahumans would not be able to feel all of the things humans can. While it would probably be possible to still have good feelings, it would be impossible to feel them on the same level we do now. Without feeling, metahumans will be able to take over the world easier than if they did have feelings. It is much easier to commit crimes, and do immoral things when there is a lack of …show more content…

Transhumanism is going to start out small with slight enhancements to help athletes, special needs people, etc.; but like most things, that will get old. Once the wonder is lost, scientists will need to continue to do more and more to keep people interested. Eventually, people will be pieced together in labs. Parents will be able to go to the doctor and decide what genes they want their baby to have. What will happen when humans start to play God? The world will be in for a lot of trouble. Who is going to decide when it stops? Who is going to decide which humans are good enough to live? At what point will people wake up and realize what they have done? Ronald Bailey is a science correspondent for Reason magazine, and the author of “Transhumanism: The Most Dangerous Idea? Why Striving to Be More than Human Is Human.” In his essay, Bailey says, “Human liberation from our biological constraints began when an ancestor first sharpened a stick…followed with fire, the wheel, domesticating animals…transplants and contraception.” (CITE) This argument would make sense if Bailey were talking about how humans have altered the world around them to create better living conditions, but he is not. Bailey is trying to use this evidence to support the altering of humans. Altering the world in which you live is much different than altering the people that live in the world. Metahumans are obviously going to be superior to

Open Document