Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Citizenship in the Roman empire
Roman Ideas On Citizenship
How the concept of Roman citizenship evolved
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Citizenship in the Roman empire
Citizenship is highly coveted in many nations, so coveted in fact that through only a few processes can one become a citizen for most nations, might that process be natural birth or naturalization. Citizenship and its privileges were also highly valued in Rome, except becoming a citizen was extremely difficult if not impossible. Roman citizenship also leads to assassinations and war within the Italian peninsula. There is a complex history to Roman citizenship. Roman citizenship dates back to the founding of Rome in 753 BC. In the beginning, citizenship was only granted to those living in Rome. Providences and territories were excluded. Citizenship was deemed to be highly valuable because with it came the right to vote. But as Rome and its empire grew, citizens only living in Rome gradually became an issue. Provinces and territories gained partial citizenship early into the Roman Republic, but they still lacked the essential right to vote. All laws and regulations were being made in Rome, being voted on by Roman citizens only but being delegated to all the territory of Rome. The people outside the walls of Rome and its citizens were being ruled without a vote into their own laws, and they saw it as unfair. This is comparable to the issue between the emerging United States and Great Britain in the years prior to the American Revolution. The people were being legislated but had no say in their own legislation. The provinces were appeased by Rome though, for Rome was sharing the spoils of war. And since Rome was a very war fairing nation there were always spoils to give. This kept the provinces pacified for the time being. Rome stopped sharing the loot of war, though, about the time of the Punic Wars. This angered... ... middle of paper ... ... . Coşkun, Altay. "How Generous Were the Romans in Granting Citizenship?" N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Feb. 2014. . Gill, N. S. "Edict of Caracalla." About.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Feb. 2014. . Gill, N. S. "The Social War." About.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Feb. 2014. . "The Social War." Examiner.com. N.p., 05 Aug. 2010. Web. 02 Feb. 2014. . "Social War (Roman History)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 02 Feb. 2014. .
In reference to Rome, Athens’s citizenship system was less accepting by only allowing free, native born males to nationalize. While this aspect was considered a drawback by the Romans, truthfully it is actually a major tradeoff by Athens. As shown in Document A, Rome was more lenient to upcoming citizens. Although this adds to the power and development of the empire, it also creates holes in its security. Citizens with non-native origins are free to express their hatred and idea of change to the Roman government, by creating a negative cultural diffusion, and contributing to the downfall of Rome. On the other hand, Athens was free from any possible revolts and riots from any non-native Athenians.
“Romans are a people made, not born”, this idea was a common mindset held by the people of the Roman Republic (Burger, 98). The phrase applies primarily to citizenship in the Republic, yet Horatius Cocles proved that displaying virtue demonstrates this idea. In a momentous act of bravery, Horatius Cocles earned his status as a Roman, despite any connection by blood to the empire. Horatio Cocles was an exemplar in respect to Roman ideals and his actions reveal the differences between Greek and Roman principles.
In his account of the Punic Wars, Polybius declares “it is my contention that by far the most important part of historical writing lies in the consideration of the consequences of events, their accompanying circumstances, and above all their causes.” Polybius recognized the intricate relationship between circumstances, causes, and their consequences, and in his account of the Punic Wars he seeks to explain the reasons for Rome’s victory over Carthage. For centuries, Rome and Carthage lived at peace with one another, their spheres of influence separate enough to avoid conflict. Rome’s wealth and interests lay in farming and acquiring more land throughout Italy, while Carthage’s economy was naval based, and so keeping trade routes open in the western Mediterranean was most important to them. As late as 279 B.C., Rome and Carthage were allied against Pyrrhus of Epirus, and had signed two other treaties in earlier years. However, as the two powers increased in power and controlled progressively larger geographies, their interests were bound to conflict at some point, and that conflict came in the contest for control of Sicily. The result was a twenty-three year war, the beginning of a series of wars which would last over a century. The end of the first war, and the actions of Rome towards Carthage in the latter’s defeat, laid the foundation for the second war, and it was only after the third and final Punic War that Rome, after coming close to defeat in the second, annihilated Carthage and burned it to the ground, effectively ending the age of Carthaginian power. However, the question must be asked, what were the causes of these wars, and more specifically, which power was more responsible for the conflict? No Punic accounts exist...
The Romans have had almost every type of government there is. They've had a kingdom, a republic, a dictatorship, and an empire. Their democracy would be the basis for most modern democracies. The people have always been involved with and loved their government, no matter what kind it was. They loved being involved in the government, and making decisions concerning everyone. In general, the Romans were very power-hungry. This might be explained by the myth that they are descended from Romulus, who's father was Mars, the god of war. Their government loving tendencies have caused many, many civil wars. After type of government, the change has been made with a civil war. There have also been many civil wars between rulers. But it all boils
In The Constitution of the Roman Republic, Polybius gives an interpretation of what he believed be a successful political system. Using his analytical skills, he sought to find reason regarding why the Romans became so prosperous. Let’s discover in what ways this assessment came to be.
Dio, Cassius. "Roman History - Book 50." 17 June 2011. University of Chicago. 31 October 2011 .
The Roman republic at first tried to protect itself from foreign enemies, not by being defensive, but by going on the offensive and destroying those that had any possibility of threatening the young republic. Once this started it was hard to stop the citizen army’s consisted of hop-lite phalanxs from continuing on with what they were good at; War. With each successful campaign came the spoils of victory, conquered land, expansion, new ideas, art, technology, religion, and so forth. All of these spoils added great wealth and power to the republic, most likely encouraging it in to becoming a empire.
... Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997. Hopkins, Keith. A. A. Death and Renewal: Sociological Studies in Roman History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983 Johnston, Harold Whetstone. The Private Life of the Romans.
For instance, during Augustus’s reign – at the beginning of the Pax Romana – only men who were in charge of provincials, high-ranking military officers, or city council members could become Roman citizens. Later, however, Marcus Aurelius – the last of the Good Emperors – had changed the laws regarding what it meant to become a Roman citizen. A philosopher and a politician, Marcus Aurelius called himself a “citizen of the world-city… under its laws equal treatment s meted out to all” (Mathinsen 1012). The meaning behind Marcus’s words have been interpreted many ways, but what many scholars have agreed upon is that he applied this philosophy to his policies in regards to Roman citizenship. There are many advantages in regards to being viewed a Roman citizen and so that there was less conflict between the patricians, the plebeians, and the barbarians being assimilated into the new Roman culture. As Roman citizens, those who were once considered barbarians could now own land, open businesses, write wills, and defend themselves in court (Mathinsen 1025-26). Becoming a Roman citizen was made easier than before and by the end of the 200 year Roman Peace period, it was believed that any one barbarian need only be a part of the army to become a Roman citizen (Mathinsen 1022-23) and thus earning the perks that came with identifying as a
Rich, John and Graham Shipley. War and Society In The Roman World. London: Routledge, 1993.
This new Republican government, which was administered by the consuls, was not the easiest to transform. Because of the expansion in Italy, the government began to initiate political institutions. These institutions enforced laws and provided authority which were very similar to imperium. “The Romans had a clear concept of executive authority, embodied in their word imperium, or “the right to command” (Spielvogel 117). Since the Romans were very sensible in their actions, they made and implemented them only as needed. The most essential positions held were the few elected magistrates and the two consuls who were “chosen annually, administered the government and led the Roman army into battle” (Spielvogel 117). If the consul was otherwise occupied, either a dictator or praetor would assume responsibility for the time being.
4)Rosenstein, Nathan Stewart., and Robert Morstein-Marx. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2006. Print.
During the Pax Romana, Rome was not fighting in any wars but when the peaceful period ended, the government fell subjected to uncontrolled spending by the emperors Septimius (r. 193-211 C.E) and his son Caracalla (r. 211-217 C.E.). They depleted the treasury to satisfy the army and their own personal glory which led to inevitable political and financial crisis and more civil war. The fi...
Years ago, the Romans created one of the biggest and best organized empires the world has ever seen. Throughout their lands, they built towns and roads, and spread their way of life. One of the reasons why their empire was so successful was that, unlike other ancient states, the empire welcomed outsiders. Foreigners could become Roman citizens. At first this was a given as a reward for the loyalty or f...
Retrieved from http://www.roman- empire.net/society/society.html.