terrorism in SEA

1611 Words4 Pages

Introduction:
Counter terrorism in Southeast Asia is a slow and demanding process. Since 2010 the state of terrorism in Mindanao (The Philippines), southern Thailand and Indonesia have progressed at very different paces. The differences exhibited in these states can be attributed to the ability of the governments to handle terrorism during the investigation and prosecution stages. This raises issues with corruption, mismanagement, evolving methods and more volatile groups developing when others fail. Actions by these states through uniting international resources and cooperation to combat money laundering are attempting to reduce the money available to terrorist organisations but due to the domestic and low cost nature of smaller improvised explosive devices difficulties arise with detection. These states all reflect the shifting nature of terrorism towards domestically involved groups targeting governmental figures rather then dramatic attacks. This may be due to an increase in counterterrorism strategies and protocols but as each state is distinct in its terror threat, different mechanisms must be used to specifically target groups within states. Active measures have been taken in these states to combat the spread of terrorism. The targeting of financial sources, criminal arrests and successful detection and prevention of plots but extremist groups have assisted in the general reduction of terrorism but the changing methods and groups make terrorism a consistent concern for both the present and future of these states.

Due to the indefinable nature of terrorism from an international perspective, the purpose of this essay, to examine and compare recent terrorism in Southeast Asia, will adhere to the definitions existing within...

... middle of paper ...

... has yet to be determined.

The Thai government lacks the ability to successfully monitor financial transactions to non-government organisations such as charities . The state continues to be blacklisted with regards to financial transactions for failure to pass recommended legislation against money laundering and terrorist funding . This is contrasted to the Philippines and Indonesia who are actively taking steps to reduce money laundering within their states.

Like in other states, the media is being used by Thai government agencies and a small group of international Non-government organisations targeting ethnic Malay-Muslims youths in fight against radicalization and violent extremism . Overall Southern Thailand must be distinguished as a state suffering from insurgencies that use terror tactics rather then terrorist organisations promoting their ideologies.

Open Document