The Great Spanish Recession of 2007 had main macroeconomic indicators that led to an unfavorable outcome until today. The effects of such crisis has lasted for more than five years in terms of economic, political and social issues. Spain’s banking system was being contemplated by analysts for being the most compelling and cogent economy amongst various nations in Western Europe. They were considered the most equipped and capable to endure a liquidity crisis since a restrictive banking policy required to retain a high percentage of the reserves. It was clear that this assumption regarding their strong endurance proved wrong when scandals and frauds came on board such as the one in Banco Santander. Banco Santander has faced over the past years several accusations by the Fed and Spanish National Securities Market Commission, facing multiple sanctions and legal disputes resulting in economic crisis and chaotic circumstances that nurtures an ongrowing stain at the bank’s reputation.
Such offence has no political color or social class, meaning it has nothing to do with any political or social acquaintances regarding the case presented. It was only permissible nuances that are provided by the Spanish Penal code itself. However in view of how the law of grace is exercised ,may not be idle to know something more about this legal record, if only for what may come. We can only blame not one, but two chairmans present in the board of directors of Banco Santander of such scam and embezzlement.
Emilio Botin, Executive Chairman of Grupo Santander, has been encompassed in more complex cases of abuse since the outbreak of the subprime mortgage bubble. Botin sold risky convertible bonds to savers that did not meet a suitable risk profile, and no...
... middle of paper ...
...ers working in senior positions when having criminal records.
The first financial institution to suffer from such outrageous frauds was Banif. Banif was a subsidiary financial institution from Santander Private Banking. The main cause of the hardship was a sell of structured bonds of Lehman Brothers, during the collapse of the U.S. mortgage crisis, over €500 million have also disappeared. Banif charged its customers for their provided services, meaning they are provided by professionals intended to benefit the client by allocating guidance concerning their advocated products. It was discovered that certain information regarding backed securities issued by Lehman Brothers was not entirely accurate. In the best case it is logical to think that the staff of Banif has not acted with due skill and diligence in relation to the services advertised and preached its business.
The Savings and Loans Crisis of the 1980’s and early 90’s created the greatest banking collapse since the Great Depression in 1929. Over half the S & L’s failed, along with the FSLIC fund that was created to insure their deposits.
The financial crisis of 2007–2008 is considered by many economists the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. This crisis resulted in the threat of total collapse of large financial institutions, the bailout of banks by national governments, and downturns in stock markets around the world. The crisis led to a series of events including: the 2008–2012 global recessions and the European sovereign-debt crisis. The reasons of this financial crisis are argued by economists. The performance of the Federal Reserve becomes a focal point in this argument.
The year 2008 was a very scary one for anyone involved in the US stock market. Due to subprime lending, and cheap mortgages, the housing market became grossly overinflated. Naturally, as with a balloon that’s filled too much, it “popped”. The resulting collapse of the housing bubble had severe implications for the rest of the US economy, housing, and related industries such as lumber, construction, and realty all came crashing down, and the people employed in those fields soon found themselves out of work. As with the stock market crash of 1929, fear of the economic instability caused people to pull their money out of any investments they had. This can be a problem for a healthy bank, being unable to supply the money people are requesting if it’s tied up in loans. However, this would prove to be an even bigger problem if the money never existed in the first place, and would take down one of the largest scams in American history.
Jake Clawson Ethical Communication Assignment 2/13/2014. JPMorgan Chase, Bailouts, and Ethics “Too big to fail” is a theory that suggests some financial institutions are so large and so powerful that their failure would be disastrous to the local and global economy, and therefore must be assisted by the government when struggles arise. Supporters of this idea argue that there are some institutions that are so important that they should be the recipients of beneficial financial and economic policies from government. On the other hand, opponents express that one of the main problems that may arise is moral hazard, where a firm that receives gains from these advantageous policies will seek to profit by it, purposely taking positions that are high-risk, high-return, because they are able to leverage these risks based on their given policy. Critics see the theory as counter-productive, and that banks and financial institutions should be left to fail if their risk management is not effective.
Many people today would consider the 2008, United States financial crisis a simple “malfunction” or “mistake”, but it was nothing close to that. Contrary to what many believe, renowned economists and financial advisors regarded the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 to be the most devastating crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. To make matters worse, the decline in the economy expanded nationwide, resulting in the recession of 2007 to 2009 (Brue). David Einhorn, CEO of GreenHorn Capital, even goes as far as to say "What strikes me the most about the recent credit market crisis is how fast the world is trying to go back to business as usual. In my view, the crisis wasn't an accident. We didn't get unlucky. The crisis came because there have been a lot of bad practices and a lot of bad ideas". The 2007 financial crisis was composed of the fall of many major financial institutions, an unknown increase in mortgage loan defaults, and the derived freezing up of credit availability (Brue). It was the result from risky mortgage loans and falling estate values (Brue) . Additionally, the financial crisis of 2007 was the result of underestimation of risk by faulty insurance securities made to protect holders of mortgage-back securities from risk of default and holders of mortgage-backed securities (Brue). Even to present day, America stills suffers from the aftermaths of the financial crisis.
In an eleven-year span between 1994 to 2005, the subprime loans have increased $630 billion, from $35 billion to $665 billion (5). With the housing started to bubble in 2006, according to Nassar (2007), the first three-quarters over 60% of all mortgages entering foreclosures were subprime, compared to 30% in 2003 (5). This caused the subprime market to collapse, which caused the housing crisis that led to the financial crisis in the United States. This blog will look at ethical issues surrounding subprime loans, and the risks they pose to the lender and borrower. Next, critiquing the role of leadership decision-making in the subprime loan financial crisis. Then evaluate subprime loans with the notion of social responsibility. Furthermore, comparing and contrasting the resulting consequences for these actions. Finally, measures have
The Sub-Prime Mortgage Crisis of 2008 has been the largest financial crisis to take place since the end of the Great Depression. It was the actions of individuals and companies that caused this crisis. For although it could have been adverted, too much money was being made by too many people in place of authority to think deeply on the situation. As such, by the time actions were taken to attempt to rectify the situation, it was already too late. Trillions of dollar of tax payers’ money was spent trying to repair the situation that was caused by the breakdown of ethics and accountability in the private sector. And despite the government’s actions to attempt to contain the crisis, hundreds of thousands lives were negatively affected before, during, and after this crisis.
Investment banks, Rating agencies and Insurance companies are key components of the financial market. In this presentation, I’m going to explain how these three key roles worked together to create the 2008 financial crisis.
In 2008 the worst financial crisis since the great depression hit and left many people wondering who should be responsible. Many Americans supported the prosecution of Wall Street. To this day there have still not been any arrests of any executive on Wall Street for the financial collapse. Many analysts point out that greed of executives was one of the many factors in the crisis. I will talk about subprime loans, ill-intent, punishments, and white collar crime.
... middle of paper ... ... The forced liquidation of some $3 trillion in private label structured assets has been deprived from the financial markets and the U.S. economy has obtained a vast amount of liquidity that the banking system simply cannot restore. It is not as easy to just assign blame within these cases, however it is noted that the credit rating agencies unethical decisions practices helped add onto the financial crisis of 2008 and took into account the company’s well-being before any other stakeholders.
In previous years the big financial institutions that are “too big to fail” have come to realize that they can “cheat” the system and make big money on it by making poor decisions and knowing that they will be bailed out without having any responsibly for their actions. And when they do it they also escape jail time for such action because of the fear that if a criminal case was filed against any one of the so called “too big to fail” financial institutions it...
This paper provides an overview of the crisis, outlines the major causes of the crisis, examine alternative solutions to the problem
Countrywide Financial got greedy and started to make questionable and unethical decisions to make money. Countrywide Financial preyed on consumers that could not qualify for conventional loans and those that could to make more money with subprime loans. Countrywide was found guilty of mortgage fraud. The U.S. government is seeking to have Bank of America Corp. pay nearly $864 million in damages after the company was found liable for mortgage fraud (Subramanian, 2013).
Eight years ago, the world economy crashed. Jobs were lost, families misplaced, hundreds of thousands of people left shocked and confused as they watched the security of their world fall to pieces around them. In, “The Big Short,” a film directed by Adam McKay and based on the book written by Michael Lewis, viewers get an inside perspective on how the financial crisis of 2008 really happened. Viewers learn the truth about the unethical actions and irrational justifications made by those who unwittingly set the world up for failure. Two main ethically tied decisions are brought into question when watching the film: how could anyone conscionably make the decision to mislead investors by misrepresenting mortgage backed securities (MBS), and why
In conclusion, we feel that the recommendation we have suggested in this report is a suitable foundation to build a sustainable and prudent financial system in this country. This will facilitate the financial industry both, withdraw out of this crisis and in the future avoid as much as possible inducing the scale of matters at present. As the report suggest, everyone contributed in their own miniscule way to this crisis, we feel that it’s up to every one of us to contribute to the overall recovery of this financial crises and recovery of the nation in general.