Why was there a revolution in France?

1086 Words3 Pages

The French Revolution of 1789 ferociously transformed the country from a monarchical state with feudalism, which was characterised by distinct social classes, to a modern state typified by freedom, and shifted greater power into the hands of the Third Estate. This essay aims to explore the economic, political and social situation of France prior to the revolution to discover why such a historic occurrence took place. An understanding of the socio-political structure of France in the 1700s is of paramount importance to our analysis. The three categories of estate that existed in France formed a hierarchal pyramid, which was a typical formulation in the Western World at this time. What led France, in particular, therefore, to have a revolution? An analysis of this common structure is vital to answering this question. At the apex was the King and beneath him were the First Estate of the clergy, the Second Estate of the nobility and the Third Estate of the commoners and those from other professions. The Ancien Régime of the country at the time meant that all citizens were ruled by King Louis XVI ‘absolutely’. Their long subscription to the divine right of the kings, a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy, meant that the ruler of all three estates, the king, was not accountable to his people, for he was unelected. If citizens cannot scrutinise their ruler, how can they trust them to rule in a just manner? As Thomas Paine highlights; “men holding themselves accountable to nobody, ought not to be trusted by anybody”. Awareness for such plausible scepticism and mistrust flourished in the eighteenth century alongside growing resentment of the countries unequal social order. The king allowed the first two e... ... middle of paper ... ...osition, with its distinctive attributes, to accomplish revolt on a grand scale. Perhaps it was the contradictions embedded within its social structure; “the pyramid was riddled with contradictions within and between constituent parts” or perhaps it was the series of interrelated contributors that accumulated to provide the ideal conditions for revolt. The growing resentment of the peasants for the king and for the privileged lifestyle that was enjoyed by the clergy and the nobles had reached its optimum. Alongside the economic downfall of France tensions rocketed. Higher unemployment and higher prices for commodities only reinforced ideals of change. The people of France were not only starving hungry but hungry for the power to reassert the natural rights of freedom. It therefore appears that a revolution in France occurred due to a grid of interrelated causes.

Open Document