Why Did Alexander The Great Spread Greek

1265 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Alexander the Great Gaugamela

Imagine yourself as a leader of an empire so massive it stretched from Greece to India. You are famed to be one of the greatest warriors, and is considered equal with the gods. You would think of yourself as a great person, and you’re right about that. This is who Alexander was . Alexander the great spread greek culture, by fighting wars he never lost throughout the mediterranean to make Greece stronger. He conquered one of the greatest civilizations at his time, Persia. Alexander the Great king of Macedonia lived from 356-323 B.C. his parents were King Philip II and Queen Olympia. Tutored by Aristotle, the prince aided Philip in defeating the Athenian and Theban armies. King Philip had conquered Greece before he died therefore giving Alexandre control over Greece. Alexander not only looked up to his father, but also looked up to the gods. He wanted to be like the great Hercules, and built many temples and statues
Alexander As king, Alexander wanted to complete his father's plan to rule not only the Greeks and the Macedonians but the whole world. The world known to Alexander was eastern Europe, northern Africa, and western Asia. He had a strong desire to do so, and when there is a will there is a way. Unfortunately for him he died before he conquered all of the world. Alexander wanted to be equal with the gods, and looked up to Hercules. Alexander thought very highly of himself. Alexander not only wanted to rule over their known world he also wanted to make Greece stronger. He spread greek culture, architecture, and lifestyle throughout his empire. Alexander made his soldiers marry persian women hoping to not only unite his empire, but also to spread greek lifestyle through his empire and further beyond. In light of these facts you can understand that because of Alexander many countries in Asia in his empire have adopted greek customs, and are still visible

Show More
Related

  • Ap World History Chapter 7 Summary

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander adopted Persian governing practices, but he had little use for Persian culture. According to his Greek biographer Plutarch, he considered himself "a governor from God and a reconciler of the world." He hoped that Greek culture would, through his actions, permeate all of Asia, inspiring its peoples to pursue virtue, excellence, and truth. This heroic idealism blended with practicality in his plan to develop the Tigris, Euphrates, and Indus rivers as commercial waterways linking all of Asia These undertakings promised to be long and difficult, however, and Alexander was an impatient man. His soldiers' unwillingness to proceed past the Indus was a great disappointment to him, for which he compensated by throwing his own festivals and celebrations. Alexander showed early leadership qualities. When King Phillip invaded Thrace, he left Alexander in charge of Macedonia at the age of 16. During his father's absence, one of the Thracian tribes, the Maedi, rebelled. Alexander was able to mobilize an army and put down the rebellion. In 336 B.C, Alexander's father was assassinated, putting Alexander on the throne at the age of 20. Shortly after this, Alexander left Macedonia with his armies to put down rebellions in the countries of Illyria, Thrace and Greece, all of which had previously been conquered by King Phillip. Alexander then moved his armies into Asia Minor and began to conquer the peoples there. Among the countries conquered by Alexander were Syria, Phoenicia and

    Read More

  • Alexander’s Vast Accomplishments as a Conquerer

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...here are few people in history that can claim the military prowess, uncanny political maneuvering, and the overall lasting effect of the dissemination of a particular culture such as Alexander. Alexander’s exploits led to the spread of the Greek culture throughout Asia and Africa. They even went so far as to impact the Romans who dominated Hellenistic Egypt. He left in his wake and expansion of territory and commerce, with expanded trading ports and the exportation of the Greek political system. Christianity emerged with the Hellenization of the Jews and spread throughout Hellenized gentile communities. It seems impossible to catalogue every impact of Alexander’s empire. In the end, I have to conclude that Alexander does ‘fully deserve’ the title of “the Great.”

    Read More

  • How Did Alexander The Great Spread Greek Culture

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was the son of Philip Macedonia. Alexander the Great was a big admirer of Greek culture during his time. During Alexander the Great time in history he spread the Greek culture through the Middle East and North Africa. Alexander the Great past away at an early age and after his death the Greeks took over the Romans.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Influence

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the great is known as one of the most ruthless and greatest leaders the world has ever seen. In less than ten years, Alexander conquered cities from Greece all the way to modern day India. Not only did he defeat and conquer cities throughout the known world, but Alexander would also leave his mark spreading and influencing Greek society wherever he went. His leadership and conquests united the East and the West as a whole like no one up to that point had done before. His impact on culture and society when meshing his Greek background with his conquered cities became something truly unique. In 323 B.C. when Alexander passed away, he not only left behind a vast thriving empire, but also a legacy that would be remembered throughout history.

    Read More

  • Why Did Alexander Spread Greek Culture

    294 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alexander had conquered many lands during his reign. His success changed the then-known world as he spread Greek culture throughout the empires he had won. However, after the death of Alexander, the Hellenistic period proper began, as his territories were split radically altering the political landscape. Greek politics were organized around the city-state or alliances of city states into larger political units. The Hellenistic period began a time of organization into kingdoms, where cities within a territory owed allegiance, taxes, and military support to the central government. City states that did not want to be allied were unable to compete with the powerful Hellenistic kingdoms and were forced to ally themselves to one of them for defense.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you heard of Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he has accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments, you will soon realize the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire, was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: Hero Or Villain?

    377 Words  | 1 Pages

    Many people claim Alexander was indeed, “Great”. But, Alexander was far from that.ALexander would have fits of rage Alexander would burn towns down just because they revolted “He set fire to the town of Thebes, as a punishment for their revolt”. He killed thousands of innocent to get the point across that he was angry. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was an alcoholic, he neglected his empire, and lacked the fatherly skills needed for the empire.

    Read More

  • How Did Alexander The Great Change The World

    1113 Words  | 3 Pages

    Admittedly, he did help to spread Greek culture throughout his empire by founding seventy cities in the Greek fashion (Hirsch. 12/2/14), however, this was not enough to truly change the world in a significant way. Although he Hellenized the culture of these areas, Alexander was not able to create an overarching identity that would have brought the empire together and made it a cohesive whole because people were still fundamentally Egyptian or Persian or whatever ethnicity that had been before Alexander had conquered their lands. Had he been able to accomplish this, he would have truly changed the world and have created a much stronger empire as well. Additionally, his incorporation of Persian customs into his court was one way in which his changes damaged his ability to rule. When he attempted to introduce proskynesis, his only real accomplishment was the alienation of the Greek and Macedonians in his court. While proskynesis was accepted as an honor bestowed on kings in the east, Greeks and Macedonians viewed this gesture as being reserved for the gods, so they were quite displeased to be forced to perform this for Alexander. Had he taken a less obstinate stance and been “…honored by the Greeks and Macedonians as a human being…and by foreigners alone after the foreign fashion” as Callisthenes had suggested, Alexander could have spared himself the trouble of alienating men from his homeland. What truly makes this kind of action a danger to his authority was the fact that most of his army was Greek or Macedonian. If he ever overstepped himself by becoming too “Orientalized” he could very easily have lost the support of his main fighting force, which would have been a massive loss for the new

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Diodorus And Plutarch

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander believed he was a divine mediator for the world. In other words, he believed he was chosen by god to solely lead the world. Thus, Arrian wanted to emphasize Alexander's arrogance because he believed that he was god-like and should rule over everyone. Furthermore, after Alexander’s death, he still had extravagant plans for his empire. Alexanders wanted ridiculous projects to be completed. He wanted to build one thousand war ships to fight the Carthaginians and other African nations, and create cities and populate them with his people in Europe and Asia to expand his empire. In Diodorus’ Alexander’s Last Plans, He explains Alexander’s final wishes from a realistic standpoint. Diodorus writes, “When theses plans had been read, the Macedonians, although they applauded the name of Alexander, nevertheless saw that the projects were extravagant and decided to carry out none of those that had been mentioned.” Diodorus emphasized that Alexander believed his people should continue to follow him and his beliefs long after his death. The projects in Alexander's will spoke about were time consuming, and extravagant. Furthermore, many people did not share Alexanders beliefs of world

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Really Great?

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great is great because of his remarkable achievement which helped to create a long lasting legacy. Alexander started to build his empire in 334 BCE after taking the new role as the king. It only took eleven years to build an empire that was large and lasted several years. In addition, the empire Alexander created stretched over 2,200,000 square miles becoming bigger than the United States (Alexander’s Empire Doc. A) (Alexander’s Legacy Doc, E). This proves that Alexander the Great is great because although the process was eleven long years to make a strong empire, Alexander wasn’t willing to give up and

    Read More

  • Alexander: The Not So Great

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.

    Read More

  • Does Alexander The Great Deserve His Title

    1820 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great deserved his title because he extended his massive empire, also naming many cities after himself. Alexander the Great had conquered so much land that he was able to name more than 70 cities after himself and one after his horse. Alexander commemorated his conquests by founding dozens of cities (usually built up around previous military forts) which he named Alexandria. I feel that if you are able to name 70 cities after you, your truly great. Also, Alexander was a great conqueror, in 13 short years he amassed the largest empire in the entire ancient world — an empire that covered 3,000 miles. And he did this without the benefit of modern technology and weaponry. Alexander had created the biggest empire ever, even today. He did so without guns. He used spears, shields and arrows to conquer 3,000 miles. He also did this on foot and horse over just 13 years. Even today it would be hard to conquer that much land in 13 years. This is truly an amazing accomplishment. After three grueling years of warfare and three decisive battles, Alexander smashed the Persian armies at the Tigris River and conquered the mighty Persian Empire, including the legendary city of Babylon. The Persian army was the best army at the time, they had been the army to beat. Alexander slowly but surely had

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Warrior King

    863 Words  | 2 Pages

    For example, due to the fact that he created amazing battle strategies he was then considered the greatest military leader. He was also credited with the spread of Greek culture and education throughout his great empire. In other words, in his great leadership he also advanced the Greek education and culture along with his militaristic skills. In addition in the text it reveals, “From an early age he was always an achiever, having always done well with his studies…” This quote portrays that his education was an essential role in his life which made him into a great leader. His fighting forces also proved how strong he was as the text states, “Many died along the way but Alexander managed to maintain great fighting forces…” His great fighting forces also gave him a reputation of leading his men to the battle in an impressive speed. As you can see, many individuals believe that Alexander had the abilities and qualities of being

    Read More

More about Why Did Alexander The Great Spread Greek

Open Document