What Part Britain Played In The Scramble?

1361 Words3 Pages

In the late nineteenth century during the period of New Imperialism, a singular event which has since been known as ‘the scramble for Africa’ took place. The European powers, most notably Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Portugal rather suddenly and competitively began their colonization of Africa. Together they colonized almost the entire continent; all but Ethiopia and Liberia were taken control of. Historians have continuously debated the causes of this event, and many theories have come to light, however presently there is still no definitive answer. The part Britain played in the scramble is, in particular, an interesting case. Britain in fact colonized the highest number of African territories, and therefore gained the most power. …show more content…

Due to these reasons there was a great pressure on the British government to expand, and consequently they gave their support to Scottish businessman and shipowner, William Mackinnon, and allowed him to establish and lead the Imperial British East Africa Company. Mackinnon himself believed that the Eastern area held great economic potential, and he was a significant factor in the eventual decision to expand. The East did in fact have trade opportunities in many resources such as ivory, gum copal, India rubber, tobacco, and more. However, the primary reason for Britain’s change of attitude in regards to expansion in the East was in fact not for trade interests, but to counter Germany, and prevent them from taking control of the area. Another important factor is that the east coast also had close links to India, where Britain had vital empire - there were East ports lying on the Cape route to India, which could potentially be very beneficial, such as in times of crisis. Although a similar situation to the West, the expansion of the East was significantly more politically driven. This corresponds with Robinson and Gallagher’s theory, who argued that since trade in the west surpassed that in the east, Britain’s concern with the east …show more content…

They did so both for the economic benefits, and as yet another political move in order to protect their interests from the other European powers. Taking control of the Cape Colony allowed them to more accurately control the seas to India, in order to prevent the French from reaching it. Britain had reason to perceive the French as a threat as they had very recently acquired the Seven Provinces of the Netherlands, the mother country of the Dutch East India Company. As for the economic benefits, the most important of these was in the form of gold, which was discovered in the Transvaal in 1886, which naturally drew the attention of the other European powers, and thus exacerbating Britain’s concern of protecting their interests in the area. Cecil Rhodes, a member of Parliament in the Cape Colony, played a significant role in the further expansion in the south. He was determined for Britain to expand their empire all throughout Africa. He firmly believed that the British were superior to all other ethnicities, all therefore it was their duty, and further God’s will that they should not only expand in Africa for their own gain, but also in order to “protect” and “civilise” Africa and its natives. As like with Mackinnon in the East, the British government

Open Document