Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between human beings and animals
The relationship between human beings and animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between human beings and animals
Pictures pictures pictures - stories stories stories. Jesus peppered his teaching with illustrations taken from the daily lives of his hearers. If they had had dogs and cats, rabbits and hamsters I'm sure there would have been stories about the escaping hamster or the disobedient dog. But I don't think they did - it was all sheep and shepherds as far as animals were concerned with the odd pig and sparrow thrown in for good measure!
But back in the Old Testament there were a few more animals. And in today's psalm the writer tells how all the animals in the wild, large and small tell us how wonderful God is. From the biggest elephant to the tiniest mouse their design shows us a lot about how God cares about the earth he has made.
They all look to God to give them their food when they need it. Have you ever thought of animals expecting to get their food from God? When God opens his hand, says the psalm, the animals are satisfied with good things.
But does that mean anything when we think about our pets? Lets consider dogs. They depend on us rather than God to give them their Chappie or their Pedigree Chum don't they? But think abut it - here's a picture that Jesus didn't use but I think is quite useful. What relationship do our dogs have with us? They depend on us for their food and their shelter. We train them and, with any luck they obey us when we say sit or heel. They look to us don't they? With those warm brown eyes that just melt your heart. And what about our attitude to them? When they accidentally do a wee on the carpet or run off when we're taking them for a walk? Do we beat them and banish them from the house for ever or never take them for a walk again? Of course not! We tell them they are naughty and then forgive them and give them a hug. Grown ups our love for dogs is what we'd call unconditional isn't it? Children that's a big word which means it doesn't matter what they do, we'll still love them and care for them. Why? Because they are a member of the family. Just like the sheep in Jesus' time were an integral part of the shepherd's family perhaps.
I guess that few of us have pet sheep, but I'd like to suggest that the relationship between us and our dogs is a pretty good picture of the relationship between God and us.
In Matthew 10:32-33 Jesus states, “…if anyone denies me here own earth, I will deny that person before my Father in heaven.” Although he is unaware of it at the moment, Numada’s writing is a reflection of his love for God which is represented by his love for animals.
He saw that dog grow into what he raised him to and yet he got rid of him because he had to. How more human a person is to throw his or her own dog away. It must of hurt him so much since he saw his puppy grow into the dog he raised. I once owned a puppy as well, I adopted a puppy, a Chihuahua from the animal shelter. When I brought him home my mother, whom I live with was very upset because she does not like dogs. Moreover she does not like dogs inside of the house. She is not allergic to them nor anyone in my family she just simply did not want the dog inside nor out side of the house. I was very upset because she asked me to get rid of it. I my self did not have the heart to do so and neither did I plan on getting rid of a little innocent dog who had no place else to go. One day as I come home from school I noticed that Pete, my dog was not outside in the driveway waiting for me. Which was strange, so I came inside the house and notice that he did not bark as I came inside and to my surprise my mother got rid of him. She gave it to a friend who has a passion for animals as well. The example I gave reminds me of Turgenev and Marx. Turgenev representing myself, and Marx representing my mother in my
In order to make sense of these inherently opposite features, we must seek a higher authority and focus on God’s beauty, mercy, love, and grace. Our God, who is the creator of the world, has a plan for us all and intends for us to seek out His will. When we look around us and see that God created and feeds the sparrow just as he created and feeds us, we can begin to understand God’s will and His purpose for us. The entire enormity of this world and what God created becomes clearer. God seeks a relationship with us. There are times when reading the Bible, a passage or verse may seem too confusing or unrelatable in our current situation, although a God who created nature and everything in it always reveals the truth in His time for His plan for
So by the natural order of things, we can treat animals in any way we like (106). The second assumption is, Animals have no moral standing of their own; we’re free to treat them in any way we desire or please (107). Before moving along, it’s an essential to comprehend what Bentham means by “God’s image” and “no moral standing.” Bentham defines God’s image as, the humans that are relatable to him because God is depicted as a human and not a nonhuman (106). No moral standing can be explained as this, it’s the concept that nonhuman animals don’t have the same morals as we humans have therefore, in this case, we can treat them in harsh, mistreating ways in order to get want we want from them. For example, in this passage, Bentham argues mistreatment of nonhuman animals for our luxury goods isn’t that of unequal moral consideration for nonhuman animals, but it’s the reason that has to do with human welfare, not the welfare of nonhuman
For many Christians, faith has little to do with what's in the fridge. Lunch with Christ would raise issues far more problematic than choice of food. However, I propose that if the above-mentioned foods came from modern factory farms, Christ would not eat or drink them. I will argue that Christians are obligated to be morally concerned about animals, and that this obligation brings Christians into moral conflict with modern factory farms. Furthermore, I will argue that Catholic Social Teaching (hereafter "CST") should emphasize a theocentric basis for such obligation and conflict.
Any form of life is sacred in the eyes of God, and we as humans are taught not to destroy or harm that; "The righteous one is caring for the soul of his domestic animal, the mercies of the wicked ones are cruel." (Proverbs 12:10) The only time we are allowed to inflict harm on another animal is to provide food, as stated in (Genesis 3:21; 9:3; Exodus 21:28). Pope John Paul II offers some insight to human and animal suffering. He demonstrates that we as humans feel physical pain as well as animals, but what sets us apart is that we have the ability to question why this evil exists. Although animals do not have the intelligence to question why they are captive, we as humans realize their sadness stems from the lack of the natural experience God has created for them in the wilderness. Through Adam, Job and David we learned to understand why God makes suffering in the world. We also learned that no matter how bad a situation is, we should never reject God’s love and praise. Holding animals captive in zoo 's results in us humans rejecting God. God created us to be stewards over animals and help and aid them through his will, not through our own will of holding them captive in zoo 's. By captivity, we are rejecting a fundamental value to honor God 's will. Besides rejecting God’s will, holding animals captive makes them more aggressive toward each other and humans. This aggression forms evil when they attack. Adam Roberts, senior vice president of Born Free USA states that holding animals captive outside their natural setting results in their aggression and sadness. Human suffering throughout creation has not only brought us closer to God, it has allowed the human race to develop a deeper compassion and love for God 's wonderful works. That very love and compassion allows us to see the true beauty of animals. It is understood that not every human
Because the animals decide that they want to run the farm by themselves, they make up a way of living called Animalism. The basic principles of Animalism are two, all animals are to be treated as equals, and no animals shall acquire any human traits or
For Christians animals “feel pain”. Ignore it would be an absurdity. They also have rights. Not surprisingly there are rules to protect animals and Christians accept them. Four major religious movements such as the Christian, Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist promote compassion, love and respect for animals. The problem is that the faithful do not always respect these provisions and transform these ideas of universal compassion so that is most suitable to their desires.
Humans and animals have always coexisted together for as long as man could remember and exist. They would hunt each other for survival, sometimes man would come out as the victor, and sometimes it was the animal. Mankind would feast on them like they would feast on us. With time, this relationship would change. The animals would become our companions as well as being our food. They would become our hunting tools, such as in tracking prey. They would later be used as our means of transport and also as labor tools, such as when humans would need help working on their farmland. Let’s not forget that they also provide us with entertainment, such as in a zoo or as a circus attraction. Although only some cultures still consider some animals as sacred, most of us look down on them, consider them inferior to us. There was however a time when we worshipped them more and even admired them. We will explore this worship and admiration of animals in this essay as we compare and contrast the depictions of animals in the Upper Paleolithic period in cave arts and in Ancient Egypt in order to identify the presence of a shift, if there was one, in our reverence of animals in between both periods.
...efore unholy and received no blessing from God, granted only by the care if man. Only the wild animals with the cloven hoof and cud chewers were considered clean, this is the first defining factors of clean animals, the second is the uses of animals and their value, such as the pigs which have no value since they produce only meat and do not chew the cud, the third defining factor is the real in which the animals live in. In the air only two legged flying birds are clean. In the land only four legged that hop or walk. In the Water only those who swim with fins and have scales are clean. The predatory habits or scavenging was not considered. The dietary rules explored by Douglas were restrictions with the purpose of inspiring meditation, on the purity and completeness of God
Animalism had a great effect on Animal Farm. In the beginning of the novel, all the animals cared only for one thing. The defeat of Mr. Jones, and the equality of each animal. After Mr. Jones was finally defeated, and the animals were on their own, the Seven Commandments, (similar to the Ten Commandments) were established. The Seven Commandments were to be the principles of Animalism, an unalterable law by which all animals must live by. The pigs, Snowball and Napoleon along with the other animals, decided to inscribe the commandments on the wall, in large white lettering, so that they never be forgotten. These commandments were established for the good of each animal, to maintain order and a peaceful life on the farm. Old Major, the prized middle white boar, taught Animalism and the commandments. He was the leader of the animal’s rebellion. Old Major was the one who led the way for the animals, and taught them exactly what Animalism meant. He clearly states this in the speech he gave, a few days before his death. “Among us animals let there be perfect unity, perfect comradeship in the struggle. All men are enemies. All animals are comrades.” In the beginning, the animals lived each day the way Old Major taught them to. However, throughout the novel, Animalism slowly began to break away. Men were becoming comrades to the pigs, and the other animals were played as fools. The farm was collapsing little by little. Due to the animal’s low understanding and intelligence, th...
Restate Thesis Statement: Dogs don’t only give owners happiness; they also affect their owners positively.
The owner needs to be in command for the training to be effective; the dog cannot be in charge of himself. Without proper training than socialization will exacerbate any mood an owner has before their dog interacts with others. Socialization, which has importance for the owner because of how much easier it is to take care of something that does not make a nuisance of itself, allows the relationship between the dog and the owner to be stronger. You need to be capable of having guest over without having your dog bouncing on to the first person they see. Dog’s need to be socialized into the new environment they are living in and it is important for the owner to take this initiative because if they do not they may end up with a dog that actually
Since animals, especially dogs, share similar emotions as people they to make great companions. Animals do show us how to love better, because their emotions are more pure than a human's. According to Mary Lou Randour, in "What Animals Can Teach Us About Spirituality", animals are spiritual companions to humans. She tells the story of a boy who, after murdering someone, receives a dog to care for as a form of therapy. The dog comforts him, and the teenager learns to love the animal over time. The boy's pet is "healing his soul" by teaching him how to love. Dogs give their masters unconditional love, never questioning the human's orders or disciplines. I thought the story of the dog appearing in the author's backyard as her dead grandfather was rather outlandish. All of Randour's examples of how animals influence our feelings were viable aside from the disappearing ghost dog.