Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is gun control effective in reducing crime essays
Is gun control effective in reducing crime essays
Is gun control effective in reducing crime essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is gun control effective in reducing crime essays
Gun control is one of the major issues in the United States and many have different opinions on how to handle the issue. There are two sides of the gun debate: one is gun control and the other is known as the pro-gun rights groups. One side with the approbation of gun control, debates that the U.S. should have stricter regulations, so there would be less crime and violence. The pro-gun rights groups, debates that guns are needed for self-defense and to protect our rights to own guns. The gun control group favors for more gun laws. They want more registration or more licensing to obtain legal ownership of guns. They want to close any loopholes and hinder any illegal ownership of guns. The gun control group respects the right of self-protection, …show more content…
In addition, they believe that guns should not be sold at gun shows because it is being sold by a private seller, and the person purchasing the gun doesn’t need to have a background check. According to bradycampaign.org, “40% of gun purchases bypass lifesaving Brady Background Checks because the law doesn 't adequately cover guns sold by private sellers or over the Internet.” However, their main goal is to create “an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities” …show more content…
They claim for those who are certified to have guns can use their rights freely and hold a gun with them to be safe. They argue for the people having the right to carry their guns out of their home and anywhere they go to protect themselves and their families from murders and to also protect others at an unexpected crime scene.
According to CNN, “Andrew Jerome Wurst, a 14-year-old middle school student opened fire at a school graduation dance, being held at a local restaurant. The shooter killed one teacher and injured two students and one teacher. The restaurant owner, who grabbed his own shotgun from his office and went after the shooter, apprehended the armed teenager.” Because the restaurant owner had his own gun, he was able to stop the shooter and saved many lives. With guns in the right hands who are trained and are responsible, there would be no harm but safety for themselves and for
In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.
Gun control is an issue that is constantly being debated. There are people who are pro gun control and those who believe gun control is unconstitutional to the citizens. Many political leaders and organizations have strong opinions on gun control, which keeps the gun control debate publicized. Gun control is limiting or taking the right of citizens to carry or purchase a gun. Guns are used for protecting the citizens by police officers and the military, as well as for many personal reasons like hunting and self-defense. There are times that guns are used for the wrong reasons like murder, or put in the wrong hands which lead to accidental deaths. Choosing a stand on gun control can be hard, but hearing both sides can help a person make a decision.
This essay will discuss the pros and cons of gun control. Some U.S. States have already adopted some of these gun control laws. I will be talking about the 2nd amendment, public safety, home safety, and do gun control laws really control guns. I hope after you have read this you will be more educated, and can pick your side of the gun control debate. So keep reading and find out more about the gun control laws that the federal and some state governments want to enforce on U.S. Citizens.
Is it any coincidence that the states with the loosest gun laws in America tend to contribute to the highest amount of national gun deaths and injuries? This is one of the main questions we should be asking when deciding what is best for our country and its citizens. Although gun control has been an ongoing issue, certain events like the Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, and the Aurora, Colorado mass shootings have increased our attention to this topic. Although I believe that Americans possess the right to own a firearm, I believe there should be detailed screening and control systems to keep guns out of the wrong hands, to prevent more gun violence from happening in the future.
Due to recent shootings in four cities gun control legislation has become a big issue throughout the United States. Government officials have presented legislation for gun control to help reduce mass shootings; however, even with these suggestions for strict gun control twelve states have already passed laws that offer fewer limitations for gun possession. After the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012, Connecticut passed a law to ban gun sales that hold large amounts of ammunition. According to McLeod “in Newtown, Connecticut, the families of ten out of twenty children killed in a December 2012 massacre at the Sandy Hook Elementary School have sued a North Carolina-based gun manufacturer, alleging Remington Outdoor Co.’s Bushmaster
Recently, the government has started to put more of an emphasis on the lack of gun laws in place. They have passed certain laws that require background checks for a person to become licensed to carry a gun legally, but this has brought up a huge controversy on the idea of gun control. The two sides are arguing about how the government should handle gun control. The first side states that the United States should be cracking down and putting various laws making it almost impossible for a gun to end up in the hands of a criminal, and the other side states that anyone can find a way to receive a firearm with the intent to harm a population. If the second side was true, the United States
Gun control is a highly controversial topic in today’s world where the fight is between the liberal and the conservatives. Many people believe that guns should be banned due to many recent massacres that have happened whereas others are wanting people to have background checks done before owning a gun. I am against gun control because banning handguns in the United States should not be allowed because handguns fail to protect the people and it is ineffective.
One of the article I read, a elderly homeowner was defend himself when a suspect broke into his house and assaulted him, the homeowner shot the suspect in the arm, then the suspect ran off. The homeowner was lucky that he was safe, but was injured by the assault from the suspect. Police captured the suspect later on. Those kinds of things can happen to anyone of us, so we do need the weapon to protect ourselves. First, from having more guns, the gun sellers/manufactures can be a benefit because they are going to get more business. The gun manufactures have to make more guns for the public, the sellers gun have to order more guns from the gun manufacture. The gun sellers now have to sell his order to the public, the more guns they sell, the more money they will be making, and this eventually can help them to increase the growth of our economy. Second, the owners will be benefited from the position because they can feel stronger having that sense of security. Gun owner having that gun in their house, they can at least have a chance of fighting back against any home invaders. The gun owners can use the firearms in self-defense against criminals or any suspect. Third, gun enthusiast; a gun enthusiast is a person who likes collecting, shooting, learning and talking about guns. They can bring a positive image to the public about having more guns, and the good about having the right to bear arms. One of the well know gun enthusiast is Wayne LaPierre; he is the vice president and executive officer of the National Rifle Association. The famous quote from him was “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”. Those people’s influence can increase the number of people to get the concealed permit about
In order to be qualified to carry and conceal a weapon, an applicant must submit their addresses for the last 10 years, firearm training information, a photo, and proof that they have been fingerprinted at an approved facility. (WTTW) An individual must also answer questions about their criminal history. This lengthy process makes sure that those who carry a weapon are qualified and will not be a threat to the public. Although a facility may be labeled as gun-free, a sign will not stop a criminal from performing an act of violence. By eliminating “gun-free zones”, the inhabitants of a facility will be protected and the rights of those who choose to carry and conceal a firearm will not be taken away. On the other hand, many promote the concept of “gun-free zones” as they feel more comfortable and reassured knowing that a firearm will not be in the same area as them. Moms Demand Action, a group that promotes stricter gun laws, believes that guns in America are attacking children. Similarly, many Americans believe that “gun-free zones” are the solution to gun
The National Rifle Association generally believes that if more ordinary, law-abiding citizens carried weapons, criminals would not have a safe place to commit mass murders and other violent crimes.
Central in the arguments against gun control is its ability to restrict any citizen of the United States the right to own guns which is protected under the constitution. Specifically, due recognition is made to its connection to the 2nd Amendment wherein it seeks to protect the individual liberties of people. This facet also applies to gun ownership regardless of the original objective and intention. “The second amendment from the Bill of Rights grants private citizens the right to bear arms. Thus, people who stand firmly against gun control insist that no legislation, technically, should have the right to take away a citizen’s guns without first repealing the amendment in question” (Groberman 1). A good approach to consider in highlighting this part comes from depriving the citizen of his basic right on the basis of specific presumption that it would be used for violence or crim...
Not because we're going to be another statistic about mass shootings in America, but because we are going to be the last mass shooting. We are going to change the law.” Getting rid of guns can stop suicide, murder, and mass shootings but those are just some of the things that it stops. “ Issue Overview…”, explains their side by stating “It said that gun violence costs the U.S. $229 billion a year.” The U.S. is paying to much money for something that people should not be doing, people are abusing the fact that they can even have a gun. “ Famous speeches…”, shows their evidence and facts about the situation. “In Florida, to buy a gun you do not need a permit or a gun license. Once you buy a gun you do not need to register it. You can buy as many guns as you want at one time.” This is where it is getting to far and one should need more than a permit or license and should only be able to have a least two guns at a time. People are getting to carried away with guns and thinking it is ok when it is not, they think it is cool and funny but it has some serious
According to the research Pew survey in March 2013, 83 percent of all adults surveyed, and 79 percent of gun-owners; 86 percent of people living with a gun-owner; and 74 percent of NRA households, approved of background checks for private and gun-show sales. As much as 40 percent of all gun sales are undocumented private party gun sales that do not require a background check, otherwise known as the "gun show loophole". 56 percent of all people surveyed approve of assault weapon bans and 53 percent of all the people surveyed approve of high-capacity magazine bans. 90 percent of the people with a gun in their home approved of laws to prevent the purchase of guns by the mentally ill, and 60 percent approved of a federal database to track gun sales. Don Macalady, member of Hunters against Gun Violence, stated, "As a hunter and someone who has owned guns since I was a young boy, I believe that commonsense gun legislation makes us all safer. Background checks prevent criminals and other dangerous people from getting guns." Coming from someone who has been around guns his whole life, having so much experiment in the gun field, he is very wise with his words and I fully agree with
Because of its vagueness, the interpretation of the Second Amendment splits the gun control advocates from their opposition. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This complex sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many arguments to light with its simple wording. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have legal footing on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is a gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “defend(s) and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans”(NRA). What gun rights activists like the NRA fail to understand are the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited”(Supreme Court). These sanctions are legal evidence that the Second Amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. Moreover, Justice Antonin Scalia, is regarded as the most conservative justice, and clearly highlights that gun control is useful and
This year there was a new gun law added to the long list of gun laws. In Colorado and Oregon the law was passed with a huge margin. The law states that you can not buy a gun at a gun show without a background check, and for it to be a gun show there only needs to be 3 or more people. So, in other words many of the police officers in the world will now be breaking the law when the switch guns with other officers. For instance, there are four officers standing around at the police station, and a couple of them decided to try out each others gun for a day or two. Under this new law, the officers have now broken the law. Many gun owners say there is no need for this new law. The NRA and many other pro-gun groups did everything they could try and make sense of it to people. Even after spending almost 2 million dollars, they still failed. (Kleck). Sarah Brady, Chair of Handgun Control, Inc, was quoted when she said, " These two overwhelming victories clearly demonstrate that all Americans, including gun owners, support responsible gun laws which keep criminals from buying guns.