Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis two kinds by amy tan
Walk about character analysis
Buggin out character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are various opinions on the westward expansion explained throughout the following texts: “Reporting to the President, September 23- December 31, 1806” (pages 418-21) by Stephen Ambrose, “The Way to Rainy Mountain” by N. Scott Momaday”, “Chief Joseph Speaks…” by Chief Joseph, and lastly “There is No True history of the Westward Expansion” by Robert Morgan. Heroes and villains were presented in all of the texts to show there was different sides and opinions to each story of the expansion. There were also emotions such as anger and happiness shown throughout the texts. It is now claimed that there is no true history shown due to the multiple biographies with only opinion. The way Robert Morgan presents his idea in “There is No True history of the Westward Expansion” implies that he was not a supporter of westward expansion. The author writes about various texts to make a claim stating the following: ‘“There properly no history ,” Robert Waldo …show more content…
He states, “For a short time we lived quietly. But this could not last. Chief Joseph supports his claim by giving a timeline of the horrific events that had occurred. The tribe had given up land to live peacefully with the white men: however, this did not solve any issues. In the text, Chief Joseph states, “ If an Indian breaks the law, punish him by law. If a white man breaks the law, punish him also.” Although the tribe wanted peace, it was not given to them. In the text, “The Way to Rainy Mountain” by N. Scott Momaday, the author quotes, “The end, too, was a struggle, and it was lost.” The prologue tells about the Kiowa people relocating during the westward expansion and their sentimental relationship with the land. Many of the Kiowa people “withered and died like grass.” Momaday supports his claims of the hardships created during the expansion by using words to describe the way the people
Chief Joseph and Helen Hunt Jackson are two very important people who both share strong yet different perspectives toward the treachery of the U.S. Government along with the unfair treatment of Indians around the 1800’s. Chief Joseph was born in 1840 in the Wallowa valley of Oregon, and belonged to the Nez Percé tribe, which was made up of some 400 indians. The Government had made many valid promises among the tribes, just to come back and break these words with more conflict and war. All Chief Joseph was in search for was for the chaos among the whites and indians to be replaced with peace, brotherhood, and equality. Stated in the text, “We ask that the same law shall work alike on all men.” In other words, Chief Joseph believed that people
West, Elliott, Contested Plains: Indians, Goldseekers and the Rush to Colorado, (University Press of Kansas,
From 1800 to 1850, there was an increased interest in territorial expansion in the United States. During this time the United States found itself in a position to acquire more land, starting with the Louisiana Purchase all the way to the Mexican Cession. Upon reviewing the documents, it became clear that documents A, I, and H, were against the expansion the the United States while the rest documents were mostly for the expansion of the United States. However, each of the documents were conveying different views from various people spread out over the span of 50 years. Numerous amounts of debates emerged arguing if the United States should obtain the new land, and people’s thoughts on the matter were influenced by the different wars and activist groups, and
The Manifest Destiny was a progressive movement starting in the 1840's. John O'Sullivan, a democratic leader, named the movement in 1845. Manifest Destiny meant that westward expansion was America's destiny. The land that was added to the U.S. after 1840 (the start of Manifest Destiny) includes The Texas Annexation (1845), The Oregon Country (1846), The Mexican Cession (1848), The Gadsden Purchase (1853), Alaska (1867), and Hawaii (1898). Although this movement would take several years to accomplish fully, things started changing before we knew it. New technology took off right away!
How do you see progress, as a process that is beneficial or in contrast, that it´s a hurtful process that everyone at one point of their lives has to pass through it? At the time, progress was beneficial for the United States, but those benefits came with a cost, such cost that instead of advancements and developments being advantageous factors for humanity, it also became a harmful process in which numerous people were affected in many facets of life. This all means that progress is awsome to achieve, but when achieved, people have to realize the process they had to do to achieve it, which was stepping on other people to get there.
In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. It doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, exemplary citizenry for its survival, and that independence and honor lead to land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. American Westward Expansion primarily strengthened the nation because it added new resources, railroad tracks and land, and the increase in population was huge during these times, which could make up a strong nation that has a virtuous government, with all the diversity of opinions and ideas.
America was expanding at such a rapid pace that those who were in America before us had no time to anticipate what was happening. This change in lifestyle affected not only Americans but everyone who lived in the land. Changing traditions, the get rich quick idea and other things were the leading causes of westward expansion. But whatever happened to those who were caught in the middle, those who were here before us?
All in all, the treatment of the American Indian during the expansion westward was cruel and harsh. Thus, A Century of Dishonor conveys the truth about the frontier more so than the frontier thesis. Additionally, the common beliefs about the old west are founded in lies and deception. The despair that comes with knowing that people will continue to believe in these false ideas is epitomized by Terrell’s statement, “Perhaps nothing will ever penetrate the haze of puerile romance with which writers unfaithful to their profession and to themselves have surrounded the westerner who made a living in the saddle” (Terrell 182).
...ed on Westward expansion, then it is none too appealing to realize that Westward expansion meant the brutal conquest of the native population. To come to grips with this reality, Native Americans were pushed out the conscious of Americans. Westward expansion is much more palpable if the West is viewed as free, open land that was ripe for the taking – as described in Turner’s thesis. When Americans were finally confronted with the fact that Native Americans had occupied the land, the Natives were depicted as brutes that were not capable of correctly taking care of the land. Overtime, however, historians have been able to modify Turner’s thesis into a more balanced argument. Turner’s thesis, however, remains important due to the fact that it is such a clear representation of American attitudes about the frontier and Westward expansion at the turn of the century.
During the 1800s the United States government promoted Westward expansion in different ways in order to obtain territory in the West. This movement towards the West had a major change for the United States. The united states obtain territory in the West by many different ways which had both negative and positive effects. The united States obtain territory by many different ways like purchasing territory and by wars. The Westward expansion had both positive and negative effects on society. The Westward expansion led for the United States to obtain more territory.
The Americans during the early 1800's were very manipulative and were willing to do anything in order to accomplish their goals. Westward expansion was very important to the United States, claiming more land to the west was a symbol of power and the more power the United States had the more intimidating they were to neighboring countries. The only thing standing in the way of the Americans westward expansion were the natives that called that land home. In the beginning of westward expansion the Americans wanted to create a friendship with the native Americans and establish trust. So they decided to discreetly take advantage of the Indians by creating treaties that claimed to offer amazing opportunities as long as the Indians aggreged to relinquish their land to the Americans. For example in the document entitled, A Treaty between the United States of America, and the Kaskaskia Tribe of Indians. (August 13, 1803) it states, "The annuity
Yes, In the passages, Robert Morgan makes the claim that was supported the land because the land is the most popular thing that Morgan talked about in the passage.the passage states that Morgan wanted to expand the western expand The passage also stated that people wanna to cross the land without fighting. Therefore, people were trying to fight back there land to get back to the land.My people some of them have run away to the hills and have no blankets and no food.
Let’s go back in time to the 1800’s. When America was as divisive as ever, and Westward was beginning. Westward Expansion affected everybody in the east and west, however, not all people were impacted in a good way. Westward Expansion affected Native Americans negatively and white settlers positively. This is because white settlers acquired larger and more fertile land and their numbers grew excessively, while Native Americans had no shelter or resources, and their population was dropping like flies.
The Westward Expansion of the United States, that had lasted from 1803 to 1853 was a very important event that had occurred in the United States. It was a way of American settlers justify the seizing of land in the Western part United States. This was also known as Manifest Destiny in that settlers thought that it was their God given destiny to explore and expand their territories. The Westward expansion had led to many technological advancements that benefited the U.S. and had helped settlers gain better opportunities to better their lives. However, the Westward Expansion had increased tensions that led to the Civil War by crumbling the compromises that had soothed the positions of pro and anti-slavery settlers.
The American Progress by John Gast was a painting that focused on the Manifest Destiny in 1872. Westward Expansion was an ideal thought throughout the nineteenth century by early Americans. This ideology was common at the time because American’s thought that the Manifest destiny would allow them to start off fresh; commonly, people thought that it was an economic opportunity. Evidently, this ideal start of a new life portrayed a positive view of Westward expansion. Gast’s painting is an example of the Westward expansion and how it symbolizes a wonderful uprising to move forward with life. This painting shows the highlights of the expansion, but this may not have been the complete truth behind the artwork.