Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius Caesar effects on society
Julius Caesars impact on Ancient Rome
Julius caesar positive impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The 44 year long reign of Queen Elizabeth I is to be characterized as the “Golden Age”. The determination of whether she was an exceptional ruler is up to debate. The characteristics that she provided for such a title, the definition of an “exceptional ruler," the way her people viewed her, and if her ruling had a correlation to the ruling of Julius Caesar all show that she did have exceptional tendencies along with considerable flaws and mistakes made along the way. Qualities that contribute to the title of a great ruler include some such as integrity and open-mindedness and authenticity. These are only a few for those who wish to succeed at the throne and be deemed a favorable ruler. For one to rule greatly, they have to be bold and strong-willed. …show more content…
The support of her people made Queen Elizabeth I the most famous monarch. This support came from her continuous devotion and reciprocated support to her people. The Queen took up issues after the death of her late sister, Mary, Queen of Scots. Towards the end of her reign, the Queen still continuously shows devotion to her people. Her lengthy time spent on the throne provided the people of her country with stability and consistency. Though there were some who were not so supportive of the Queen. Plots to assassinate her, such as the Babington Plot, were brought together by those who did not feel the devotion and time the Queen put in to helping her country. Though those who felt this dedication and faithfulness outnumbered those who didn’t by a great deal. To be a strong ruler, one should be for and of the people. The similarities between Queen Elizabeth I and Julius Caesar seem to be slim. When Shakespeare had written “Julius Caesar”, the Queen had been on the throne for 41 years. She was just as strong in power as she was in the beginning. The immense amount of power in both of these rulers were similar. Although, the Queen’s removal from the throne as her last days came had similar dictatorial backsliding consequences on the nation of that Julius Caesar had. People had felt revolutions growing. New rulers coming into power could be a tremendous circumstance or and terrible unfortunate
Elizabeth I was the queen of England from 1558 to 1603. Elizabeth I had many qualities of an absolute ruler and these qualities helped her to make a stronger England. Among the areas that Elizabeth I had absolute power were, her total control of politics in her country, her complete ability to use the military to keep and increase her power, and her complete influence over the social and cultural situation of England.
The Tudors was one of the most powerful families to rule England in its history. Henry VII, Mary I, and Henry VIII are some of the names that come to mind when talking about this powerful family, but when it comes to the most memorable leader, Queen Elizabeth I comes to mind. Elizabeth I ruled England during an era named after her (Elizabethan Era) because she was respected and ruled her kingdom with class and grace. She was loved by all and she loved her subjects just the same. Queen Elizabeth I was one of the greatest monarchs that England had during the sixteenth century because, she had a questionable childhood, lead the nation through a war, ruled a country with no help from a man, had a love for the arts, and left a legacy that will
“’I am already bound unto a husband which is the Kingdom of England.’” (Briscoe). These words were spoken by none other than Queen Elizabeth I, one of the most prominent monarchs of England. Elizabeth’s childhood impacted the decisions she made as Queen of England. The Queen is well known for the execution of Mary, Queen of Scots as well as for defeating the Spanish Armada. Being the ‘Virgin Queen’ also added to her popularity. Elizabeth’s reign is considered to some to be an “era of glory” (Trueman), but her early years leading up to her reign were less than favorable.
According to Pearson’s article, a ruler is a “symbol of order, well-being, self-control, and achievement. The ruler maintains and governs his or her own life.” The ruler archetype is quite similar to the creator archetype in ways that they both work towards creating the perfect lifestyle through the vision of the creator or ruler. The slight difference between the two archetypes is that the creator is more ambitious and works toward making one’s dream a reality as opposed to the ruler whose main focus is obtaining order in one’s life. According to the “Twelve Heroic Archetypes” chart, a ruler is “highly responsible and would make a good leader.” The leadership aspect of my life is portrayed through my involvement as the President of the Thespian Society, a drama club at MHS, and how I am capable of hosting meetings and properly assigning roles to other members of the cabinet to ensure that the club runs well. In conclusion, the ruler archetype is predominant in my personality because of my leadership qualities and desire to achieve order in all aspects of my life such as academics, my workplace, and family
that of a man and her memory long keeps what it quickly picks up. With the
Elizabeth the first, born on September 7, 1533, is the most different and intriguing monarch in the English history (Dunn). Elizabeth is known as the Virgin Queen all of her reign. She used that image to keep out of marriage, prevent war and become one of the most beloved monarchs of the people. This image helped her also fend off Mary Queen of Scots claim to the throne. Between her vivacious and often volatile personality she led her kingdom well up until the day she died on March 24, 1603 (Alchin). The kingdom went into genuine morning for their queen of The People who had made herself loved by all of her subjects.
Upon the death of her sister--in November of 1558--Elizabeth ascended to the thrown of England. Until Mary’s rule, no woman--apart from the unrecognized rule of Matilda, daughter of Henry I--had ruled England of her own right1. Much like her sister, Elizabeth began her rule widely accepted and welcomed2. There were, however, still many who felt that women were unable to rule, being that women were said to be the weaker sex. John Knox argued that, “God by the order of his creation hath spoiled women of authority and dominion, [and] also that man hath seen, proved and pronounced just causes why that it so should be.”3 Women had always been no more then property, first to their fathers and then their husbands. If a women were to be the anointed queen of a realm of her own right and then marry, whom was beholden to whom? A woman was to do as instructed by her husband in all things, yet a sovereign was to be under the command of God only.
All of these attributes may be considered to be attributes of a good ruler. Another ruler thought almost universally to be a ‘good king’ is King David of Israel, from the Bible. He is considered one of the greatest kings of Israel, partially because showed mercy to his oppressors and to those lower in status than he. One instance of his merciful nature is the event of his son Absalom's usurpation of David’s kingdom. David flees the city of Jerusalem with his faithful men (King James Version, 2 Sam. 15). After a Benjamite, Shimei, curses David, Abishai, one of David’s soldiers, offers to kill Shimei. David, however, rebukes Abishai and says, “Behold, my son, which came forth of my bowels, seeketh my life: how much more now may this Benjamite do it? Let him alone, and let him curse, for the Lord hath bidden him. It may be that the Lord will look on mine affliction, and that the Lord will requite me good for his cursing this day” (KJV, 2 Sam. 16.
Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar follows the fall of the famous Roman emperor of the same name. Caesar as a character himself is very corrupt. He wants all the power he can get, but he does so with
Queen Elizabeth I, also known as the “Iron Queen”, was a remarkable woman of her time, she ruled with great power and longevity. She was one of the greatest feminist of time. Coming to the throne in 1558, she took the place of her father, Henry VIII. She was given one of the most difficult jobs fit for a man or King, ruling England. At the time women were second class citizens, they could not vote nor own properties and such. Surprising England with her intelligence and fierce rulings, she changed herself to make better decisions. She proved through her rulings, to everyone that females were strong and could rule just as well as a king. She refused to marry, giving a feeling of “I don’t need a man for anything.” The Queen was responsible for giving females a voice in literature and it is shown through Shakespeare’s writings.
Shakespeare shows Caesar to be, what you could say, a contradiction. The audience see how Caesar respects Antony's soldier-ship yet still fights him; they see how he clearly loves his sister, but uses her unscrupulously as a political device; and they are shown how he is very rational and dull, yet he surprisingly tells his soldiers, as well as some Egyptians about how he would parade the defeated Cleopatra. He wants to do this because he feels that 'her life in Rome would be eternal in our triumph.' This shows the reader how Caesar has strong emotional outcries, which contrasts his initial characteristics.
Leadership is something that has been around since civilization. You would think that an idea so old would be straight forward but, we can see completely different ideas of what a leader, good or bad, should look like. While some of these stories may be fictional, they line up with a historical timeline of expectations. We can also see how the role of a king and how their duties have evolved in real life. The Epic of Gilgamesh shows us how to control your power. In 1 & 2 Samuel, we see what makes a ruler great and obstacles they have to over come. When we read The Theban Plays we saw how smart a ruler had to be to please his people. While all of these leaders may seem great there are plenty of reason that makes them not great. They
Queen Elizabeth the first was one of the first woman monarchs to rule alone in the history of Europe. Her character, the way she ruled, and even her gender transformed her country’s go...
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar , he reveals his historical influences by incorporating aspects of Roman Society, such as the plebeians struggle against Roman hierarchy. Additionally, Shakespeare formulated the play’s main conflict around Caesar and his ambition, which can be attributed to the cause of man’s demise, and he based Caesar’s character after the actual Caesar motivations and conquests. He also reflects English society by including parallels between Queen Elizabeth I and Julius Caesar. Lastly, through the play’s conflict, he conveys his political views on civil war and expresses his concern for the fate of England’s government. Most importantly, Shakespeare demonstrates how age-old stories, such as the betrayal of Julius Caesar, can be applied to current society. By understanding Shakespeare's motivations and influences, readers are not only able to glimpse into the age of Roman Empire, but also, they are able to understand the political turmoil in England during Shakespeare's
Throughout the years there have been several different dynasties. These dynasties had their differences and their similarities. Each dynasty had good or bad rulers, however, the longest lasting dynasties had good effective rulers. These effective rulers helped to promote the growth of the government, which lead to increasing the length of their reign. In order to be an effective ruler, one must choose to exemplify these characteristics, being a role model, being active in the government and creating solutions to the issues facing his subjects, and also protecting them.