Virtue Ethics In The NSPE Code Of Ethics

1959 Words4 Pages

As engineers rise in the ranks of a company, they are eventually put in charge of some other employees. This includes the power to make decisions about hiring and firing of employees. In jobs for which an engineer will be hiring someone, safety is a large and recurring concern. Additionally, in the NSPE code of ethics, one of the main rules for engineers is that they only work on jobs within their field of expertise. This cannon introduces the concept that engineers have a moral responsibility to be good at their jobs. By broadening the scale of this rule, one could argue that employers have an ethical obligation to employ only competent engineers, and to fire any who are under-preforming. However, firing an employee will almost always cause …show more content…

Considering the application of the four cardinal virtues, prudence, temperance, justice, and courage, one can make a judgement of the action. The need for prudence dictates that one must spend time and thought considering what the proper course of action is. Firing someone cannot simply be a reaction to one bad performance. Prudence suggests that waiting to be sure that the employee is truly incompetent makes the resulting decision much more ethical. If there is doubt in the employee’s abilities, prudence dictates that the decisions of that employee should be reviewed so that mistakes do not make it back to the client, but it also dictates that the employee must not be fired on the spot. Courage does not apply particularly well to this situation; the person making the decision has little fear to confront. However, one must possess a measure of courage strong enough to allow him or her to go through with the decision to fire the poor performer if it is truly necessary. Temperance applies primarily when an employee makes one large mistake. A person possessing this virtue will not lose their composure and fire the employee immediately. Mistakes are a fact of life, so the employer must possess enough temperance, or restraint to see past the mistakes and determine if the employee is indeed incompetent enough to merit firing. Finally, one must apply the virtue of justice. In this case, justice is the …show more content…

However, they seem to agree that the employer should be harsher on engineers due to the fact that engineers have a larger impact on the health and safety of those around them. All of the theories agree that firing someone for a weak cause is ethically unacceptable, but they have different criteria for what a good cause would be. Utilitarianism dictates that one can fire someone if the bad outcomes that will result from their incompetence outweigh the personal devastation of losing a job. This would suggest that employers should be harsher on engineers, as engineering decisions tend to put more people at risk than non-engineering decisions. Duty ethics states that an employee should be fired if and only if they will cause the company to renege on their commitments. In this case, employers need not be any harder on engineers, as all job types contribute to the company’s ability to provide for a client. Virtue ethics relies on the employer’s sense of justice, resulting in essentially the same answer as utilitarianism; employers should be harsher on engineers because their mistakes can cause more

More about Virtue Ethics In The NSPE Code Of Ethics

Open Document