Vincent Buglioi Case Study

If Vincent Bugliosi could abandon is mother’s tongue, what stopped the braggart Italian from rejecting his father’s name?

Vincent Bugliosi brainlessly believed that the evidence of the deputy who alleged that he had JUICE make incriminating statement while Grier visited JUICE in prison – was credible. Why should it be credible even if Grier were to corroborate the alleged incriminating statement that JUICE was alleged to have made.
Vincent Bugliosi seemed exceedingly dull, as he did not discern that the alleged incriminating statement was not on record, which makes everything that the deputy said – a potential lie.

"Sir, he was dull in company, dull in his closet, dull everywhere. He was dull in a new way, and that made many people think

The key was the racism that it was used to convey, and more importantly, the fact that he lied under oath.

Vincent Bugliosi lied if he implied that the key word was, ‘Nigger’. The key words were the immortalised, uneducated prejudice that was conveyed by the racist rants. Had the juror heard all of those, it would have scared and scared them, perhaps for the rest of their lives. Again, more importantly was the fact that Mark Fuhrman lied under oath.
What does Mark Fuhrman have as a human being apart from the most favourable skin colour that he neither made nor chose, but seemed to wear like as if it were a first class degree from Oxford University?
F. Lee Bailey – stated that only a fool would not look forward to the cross examination of Mark Fuhrman. The statement is loaded and coded.
The fact that JUICE did not testify should not mean he did not want to testify. He acceded to the advice of his counsels.
Silence is not guilt.

Vincent Bugliosi seemed to be a racist thug. He alleged that he did not have a racist bone in him. How should one verify that? He