Valantasis's Definition Of Asceticism

1492 Words3 Pages

In his book, The Making of the Self, Valantasis proposes a new definition of asceticism. While most definitions focus heavily on the negative nature of asceticism, Valantasis asserts that the nature of asceticism is inherently positive and fulfills a more collective purpose. Although his definition is unlike previous understandings of asceticism, ultimately his approach is one more academics should consider. After analyzing multiple primary texts such as Musonius Rufus’s Lectures, The Acts of Paul and Thecla, The Gospel of Thomas, Theodoret’s Life of Symeon, and Pachomius’s Rules, I agree with Valantasis’s definition because it presents a universal function of asceticism, is inclusive of the various types of ascetic practice, and places …show more content…

He defines ascetic practice as “any performance resistant to an externally projected or subjectively experienced dominant social or religious context specifically intended (almost as a cognitive impulse) and purposefully performed in order to inaugurate a new and alternative subjectivity” (101). The fact that any practices deviant from the perceived dominant culture that help construct the new identity are possibly considered ascetic allows the scholar to not be restricted by specific, traditional actions of asceticism. For instance, oftentimes scholars debate the ascetic nature of The Gospel of Thomas because it lacks discussion of celibacy, a characteristic considered to be a requirement for asceticism by some scholars. However, under Valantasis’s re-application, Thomas must be ascetic because of its performances that reject the current world order and promote the adoption of a new subjectivity. One of the early verses of the gospel states, “He who seeks, let him not cease seeking until he finds; and when he finds, he will be troubled, and when he is troubled he will be amazed, and he will reign over the All” (Thomas 117). The ascetic performances in this specific quote are seeking, suffering, and finding. While not considered traditional ascetic actions, the ascetic goal is accomplished. Through these activities, the ascetic builds a symbolic universe …show more content…

The pre-ascetic actively chooses this deviant life and undergoes a metamorphosis individually, socially, and symbolically that ultimately makes the ascetic performances worth accomplishing. Without providing a function for asceticism, I worry that the definition of asceticism becomes an overly ambiguous, yet oddly specific paradox that just compiles a list of miscellaneous renunciation tactics into one word. If scholars cannot properly define the meaning of a category and explain its universality, then maybe it is time to drop the category or reinvigorate the ones already

Open Document