The first meeting between Dr. Hruby and I was delayed significantly due to the incredible length of time it took the hospitals to process my paperwork. Upon arriving at his office at Twin Cities Hospital, Dr. Hruby gave me a brief introduction to his career as a general surgeon oncologist as well as the path he took to becoming a doctor. Then I had the opportunity to listen to him make 2 phone calls to patients concerning radiographic and laboratory results for breast cancer. The first patient had an X-ray with nothing of significant concern, and she was nervous before receiving the results. The next patient had a breast biopsy that showed she did have breast cancer, but the tumor was so small in size that the biopsy was enough to remove
During the 1960’s, America’s solution to the growing population of mentally ill citizens was to relocate these individuals into mental state institutions. While the thought of isolating mentally ill patients from the rest of society in order to focus on their treatment and rehabilitation sounded like a smart idea, the outcome only left patients more traumatized. These mental hospitals and state institutions were largely filled with corrupt, unknowledgeable, and abusive staff members in an unregulated environment. The story of Lucy Winer, a woman who personally endured these horrors during her time at Long Island’s Kings Park State Hospital, explores the terrific legacy of the mental state hospital system. Ultimately, Lucy’s documentary, Kings
In her personal essay, Dr. Grant writes that she learned that most cases involving her patients should not be only handled from a doctor’s point of view but also from personal experience that can help her relate to each patient regardless of their background; Dr. Grant was taught this lesson when she came face to face with a unique patient. Throughout her essay, Dr. Grant writes about how she came to contact with a patient she had nicknamed Mr. G. According to Dr. Grant, “Mr. G is the personification of the irate, belligerent patient that you always dread dealing with because he is usually implacable” (181). It is evident that Dr. Grant lets her position as a doctor greatly impact her judgement placed on her patients, this is supported as she nicknamed the current patient Mr.G . To deal with Mr. G, Dr. Grant resorts to using all the skills she
Springfield General Hospital (SGH) is committed to high quality healthcare for patients, and providing tools to support physicians, nurses and pharmacists. SGH leadership approved the computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system as a solution to reduce prescription errors, and the results of the CPOE project are disappointing. The data show increased prescribing errors after implementing the CPOE; resulting in increased costs for adverse drug events, rather than the planned cost reduction (Spector, 2013). This change management plan provides the SGH board of directors and executive management team pragmatic steps to increase quality for patients by assessing the root issue of hospital
Truth in medicine is a big discussion among many medical professionals about how doctors handle the truth. Truth to a patient can be presented in many ways and different doctors have different ways of handling it. Many often believe that patient’s being fully aware of their health; such as a bad diagnosis, could lead to depression compared to not knowing the diagnosis. In today’s society doctor’s are expected to deliver patient’s the whole truth in order for patients to actively make their own health decisions. Shelly K. Schwartz discusses the truth in her essay, Is It Ever Ok to Lie to Patients?. Schwartz argument is that patients should be told the truth about their health and presented and addressed in a way most comfortable to the patient.
One of the most complex, ever-changing careers is the medical field. Physicians are not only faced with medical challenges, but also with ethical ones. In “Respect for Patients, Physicians, and the Truth”, by Susan Cullen and Margaret Klein, they discuss to great extent the complicated dilemmas physicians encounter during their practice. In their publication, Cullen and Klein discuss the pros and cons of disclosing the medical diagnosis (identifying the nature or cause of the disease), and the prognosis (the end result after treating the condition). But this subject is not easily regulated nor are there guidelines to follow. One example that clearly illustrates the ambiguity of the subject is when a patient is diagnosed with a serious, life-threatening
Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation & Correction are the poor-quality patient care that Tomcik received and Tomcik’s health being at risk. Once engaged in a doctor-patient relationship, physicians are obligated to provide the best possible care for the patient by utilizing their skills and knowledge as expected from a competent physician under the same or similar conditions (“What Is a Doctor’s Duty of Care?” n.d.). However, in Tomcik’s situation, Dr. Evans did not deliver high-quality care, for he administered a perfunctory breast examination and thus did not follow standard protocols. There is evidence of indifference conveyed by Dr. Evans, and the lack of proper care towards Tomcik is an issue that can be scrutinized and judged appropriately. Additionally, Tomcik’s health was at risk due to the failure of a proper physical evaluation and the incredibly long delay in diagnosis and treatment. The negligence from Dr. Evans, along with the lack of medical attention sought out by Tomcik after she had first discovered the lump in her breast, may contribute to Tomcik’s life being in danger as well as the emotional anguish she may have felt during that time period. Overall, the incident of Tomcik’s expectations from the original physician and other employees at the institution not being met is an ethical issue that should be dealt with
General Practices Affiliates is considering an offer from Titus Lake Hospital to join under a provider leasing model. Under a provider leasing model, Titus Lake Hospital is purchasing General Practices Affiliates’ services. The practice will retain control of personnel, management, and practice policies. Titus Lake Hospital submitted financial reports to assure transparency during the lease agreement process. The following analysis will discuss whether Titus Lake hospital is a viable financial partner for General Practice Affiliates, possible implications of the lease, and recommendations.
Robertson Johnson University Hospital (RWJUH), which is the flagship of Robert Wood Johnson Health System, is a large non-profit hospital with 965-beds located in New Brunswick and Somerville in Central New Jersey (Robertwood Johnson University Hospital, n.d). It has been ranked among the best hospital in the nation, as well as, with several specialties, and the best place to work by other publications (Robertwood Johnson University Hospital, n.d). Their mission of improving health and well-being to its patients stands out in the communities it serves (Robertwood Johnson University Hospital, n.d).
Hospitals are busy places, and with so much going on it is hard to believe that mistakes are not made. However, there are some accidents that should never happen. Such events have been termed ‘never events’ because they are never supposed to happen. This term was first introduced by Ken Kizer, MD, in 2001 (US, 2012). The Joint Commission has classified never events as sentinel events and asks that hospitals report them. A sentinel event is defined as, “an unexpected occurrence involving death or serious physiological or psychological injury, or the risk thereof” (US, 2012). Never events are termed sentinel events because in the past 12 years 71% of the events reported were fatal (US, 2012). Because these events are never supposed to happen, many insurance companies will not reimburse the hospitals when they occur. A study in 2006, showed that the average hospital could experience a case of wrong-site surgery, one example of a never event, only once every 5 to 10 years (US, 2012). This study illustrates how rare a never event is. Hospitals do not want these never events to happen any more than a patient does. To help prevent these errors, hospitals have created policies that, if followed, will minimize the possibility of a mistake. The consequences of never events are devastating and because of this the goal is to make sure that they are eradicated from hospitals and medical facilities.
Based on them, we can definitely eliminate options (c) and (d). Option (c) is against the principle of veracity and informed consent because the doctor was lying and hiding the information about the patient’s health that the patient was supposed to know. Option (d) is morally incorrect because the patient is lied to and the surgeon is not penalized. Option (b) does abide by the principle of veracity, but is against rationality because it sets negative example for the community that the doctors can be forgiven for their mistakes. Moreover, it does not abide by stewardship because the surgeon is taking advantage of being a doctor to conceal the truth. Consequently, the morally correct decision would be the option (a) because it abides by the principles of veracity and informed consent as the responsibility of disclosing the truth to the patient is fulfilled. Moreover, considering the rationality and stewardship, it will set an example for all the doctors that incomplete disclosure of information to the patient is unacceptable and the doctors should not take advantage of their importance in the
This patient is very friendly and sociable. He was able to answer my questions without hesitation. He comes for weekly treatment of IVIG. He stated that he accepted his disease/illness and will do his best to live normal like everybody else. He stated his family especially his mother has always been there for him and see his mom sometimes tired. I was able to perform my head to toe assessment without any
I escorted her to a room, and helped her change into a gown. I understand that a 22-year old is capable of changing her own clothes, but I wanted to spend more time with her for further investigation. Auscultation of the lungs revealed bilateral clear and equal breath sounds, and heart tones were audible and regular. No peripheral edema was noted upon examination of her lower extremities, and she denied a history of similar symptoms or any medical issues in the past. Again, my nursing experience was challenged. Everything looked great, except this feeling remained that something was wrong. ER was busy that day, so I put in on order for a chest x-ray, and then told the doctor why she wanted to be seen. I told him that I ordered an x-ray, but something was not right about her skin color, not jaundiced, swallow, or cyanotic just not right, and I asked for basic lab work. The doctor felt lab work was not needed at that time, and I did not push the issue. I just thought to myself, “maybe he is right, and I have worked too many days in a row”. When the patient returned from the x-ray department, I met her at the room. I asked how
Takeuchi, E. E. (2011). Impact of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology: A Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Physician Communication. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910 - 2917. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2453
This paper’s brief intent is to identify the policies and procedures currently being developed at Midwest Hospital. It identifies how the company’s Management Committee was formed and how they problem solved and delegated responsibilities. This paper recognizes the hospital’s greatest attributes and their weakest link. Midwest Hospital hired Dr. Herb Davis to help facilitate the development and implementation of resolutions for each issue.
In the case study “Prelude to a Medical Error-Case for Chapters 4 and 7” by Sheila K. McGinnis. Nurse Karing made a cognitive biases preconception of what she knew about thrombosis and connected to Mrs Bee symptoms of a thrombosis in her left calf and proceed to order a STAT venous Doppler X-Ray to rule it out. She also Dr. Cural notify about the thrombosis in Mrs. Bee’s left calf. Dr. Cural was upset when nurse Karing called him about the clot in Mrs. Bee left calf and told her to cancel the test. I think Nurse Karing could have challenged Dr. Cural or talked to another doctor since Dr. Cural did not want to listen to her. Dr. Cural made an assumption about nurse Karing being an incompetent nurse. Instead of Dr. Cural saying nurse Karing incompetent he could have said “I am glad you called me about Mrs. Bee, a thrombosis can be a very serious problem please order the venous Doppler test right away”.