Transition from Communism in Belarus

1454 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: effect of communism

Transition from Communism in Belarus

The Eastern European country chosen for discussion is Belarus. This paper will first discuss the transition from communism based on the experience of living under communist rule. Second, the significant historical factors from 1920-1991 that led to the fall of communism will be given and traced as to how they affected the process of the transition. Finally, the choices made by Belarus during and after the transition period will be traced back to historical and transitional factors that influenced them. Inarguable evidence will be noted throughout the paper to prove the need for transition from communism and the problems with the transition. The country of Belarus is still in transition. How do they compare? Most if not all of the other former Soviet Republics have reached a post-transition status.

The transition from communism is negatively experienced by Belarus due to the recurring problems with Russia in the former Soviet Union. The historical factors that affected transition are the emergence of Belarus nationalism, which is generally credited to the Nasha Niva, a journal published in the 1906-1915 period, and the abandonment of "belorusizatiia", which was the policy of national language for each individual republic, in the 1930's (Altshuler 1998). The ethnic-national conflict, which was created roughly over the past 80 years, was not solved with the break-up of the Soviet Union. This was because of Soviet national policy and how it established "independent" states that were solely dependent on the Communist Party Central Committee (Altshuler 1998). The possible unification of Belarus and Russia is also very important because of how it is affecting transition. The un...

... middle of paper ...

...s in

The Slavic Republics (States):Russia, Ukraine, Belorus. Copyright by the Slavic

Research Center. 1-3

Belarus Now. 1998. Introduction: A society that trades a little freedom for a little order

will lose both and deserve neither. www.belarusnow.com. Belarus now is a joint

product of the Belorusskaya Gazeta, an independent weekly paper in Belarus. 1-3

Country Reports. 2000. 1999 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. Released by

The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. U.S. Department of State.

1-3

IHFHR. 1998. Report by the International Helsinki Federation for the Human Rights to

The United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Fifty-fourth session.

www.ihf-hr.org. Item no. 10b

Pastukhov, M. 1997. What Belarus-Russia Union may lead to. www.belarusnow.com.

1-2.

Show More
Related

  • The Legacy of Russia and the Soviet Union - Authoritarian and Repressive Traditions that Refuse to

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    This was, of course, only a humorous exaggeration, a case of political satire. Yet beneath the humor, there lies a very profound testament to the belief that Russia's political culture has been inherited from its czarist days and manifested throughout its subsequent development. The traditions from the pre-Revolution and pre-1921 Russia, it seems, had left its brand on the 70-years of Communist rule. The Soviet communism system was at once a foreign import from Germany and a Russian creation: "on the one hand it is international and a world phenomenon; on the other hand it is national and Russian…it was Russian history which determined its limits and shaped its character." (Berdyaev, "Origin")

    Read More

  • The Downfall of Communism in Eastern and Central Europe

    1758 Words  | 4 Pages

    the downfall of communism, as it were, took so long was the veto power of

    Read More

  • Comparing the Ideology of Lenin and Stalin

    4174 Words  | 9 Pages

    Every state is based upon and driven by some ideology. Imperial Russia was based upon autocratic absolutism for over 400 years. Following the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917, a new era dawned upon Russia. For the next 36 years she would be in the hands of two men that would attempt to apply a new, vastly different creed in ruling and transforming this country. Vladimir Ilich Lenin, as the leader of the Bolshevik party, ruled Russia from October 1917 till his death in January 1924. He was succeeded by Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, who also ruled until his death in March 1953. Both men claimed to ascribe to the broad ideology of Socialism and Marxism; both were to develop their own versions -- later to be called Leninism and Stalinism; both were to attempt to practically apply their respective ideologies whilst attempting to deal with a plethora of prevailing conditions such as internal resistance and civil war, economic collapse and foreign invasion. This paper will examine the similarities and differences between both the ideologies, and the actual economic and political practice, of Lenin and Stalin's beliefs.

    Read More

  • Russia: Lost in Transition

    1564 Words  | 4 Pages

    Historically, Russia’s relationship with the West has been shaky at best. From the Crimean War in the 1850’s to alienation following the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution all the way up to the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has been “under attack.” This has forced them to adopt a mentality that is based in self sufficiency and autarky. As Western nations attempt to strengthen democracy in Russia in the 21st century, Russia has responded negatively to these perceived “intrusions.” Therefore it is important to ask what role the West should play in Russia’s development and what is hindering this from happening? In her book Russia: Lost in Transition, Lilia Shevtsova outlines two different ways the West can approach development with Russia: let them figure it out themselves or patiently create an international environment that the Russians feel comfortable in. Shevtsova clearly favors the latter. The West’s involvement is hindered however by double standards, ideological differences, and negative perceptions of the West’s motives by the Russian people. These must first be analyzed before showing how a cautious, assertive approach is the best way for the West to assist in Russian development.

    Read More

  • Revolution Under Stalin Dbq

    441 Words  | 1 Pages

    Life in The Soviet Union Under Stalin's Rule One follower and supporter of Lenin was Joseph Stalin. He was a Bolshevik who believed that for Russia to be successful they need to have a perfect Communist state. In Stalin eyes he believed that the only way for Russia to advance and be successful was they would have to set up a totalitarian government, which is when the lives of the people and the industry are all controlled by the government. In Russia life was hard for everyone, but still Russia became a successful country As document 1 shows, Stalin, when he came to power and became a dictator, told the Russia people that "…We do not want to be beaten! One feature of the old Russia was the continual beatings she suffered for falling behind, for her backwardness… Do you want our socialist fatherland to be beaten?"

    Read More

  • Is Viadimir Vladimirovich Putin a Dictator?

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    Almost twenty five years after the fall of the Iron Curtain in the late 80s and early 90s, a few countries emerged from the shadow of the former eastern bloc such as Estonia and Poland have quite successfully transformed themselves into modern democracies while others seemed to have simply failed to do so. The Russian Federation, the successor state of the Russian SFSR, is a particularly interesting case.

    Read More

  • The Fall of Communism in Poland

    2919 Words  | 6 Pages

    of the beginning of the fall of Communism in Poland. The Communist government saw that the

    Read More

  • The Similarities Between Communism And Communism

    1209 Words  | 3 Pages

    It also marked the end of cold war between the Soviet Union and United States leading to reformed political, economic and military alliances worldwide. Upon its formation, outcome of Bolshevick Revolution of 1917, Soviet Union adopted Socialism later transforming to Communism. The main objective for Socialism and eventual Communism was to create a unified state based on centralized economic and political system. This ideology later transformed into totalitarian state. The underestimation of resistance from non-Russian ethnic groups (which was more than 50% of total population), and failure of the communism system to meet economic needs of the people were some of the reasons which to led to the decline of the USSR economy and arms competition with United States. Despite the Government’s effort to instill the ideology of communism to its people, it never took firm roots and Government ended up losing the grip of the people. With the political and economic stagnations caused by the communism, there was no choice but to change the way of doing things leading to dissolution of USSR in December 1991. The fifteen newly formed countries had overwhelming tasks of developing the economy, reorganizing the political systems, and settling the territorial disputes created earlier. There has been wars in the boundaries of the former

    Read More

  • The Russian Revolution: A Turning Point for Communism

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was a turning point in history because it tried to use communism as its main principal. “Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution” (Marx Quotes: Quotes from Karl Marx and Frederick Engels). In a communist society, everyone in that society receives equal shares of the benefits derived from labor. In a communist nation, there would be a classless society, and everyone would be happy to share their wealth. The government would own all means of production, and the government would redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor. The Russian revolution started due to the lack of food in Russia, and the huge difference between the rich and the poor. The Russian people were also mad that Czar Nicholas II was keeping Russia in war. Thousands of Russian soldiers were being killed every week. At the end of the war, around 1,700,000 soldiers died (WWI Casualty and Death Tables). At least 1,500,000 Russians and possibly up to more than 5 million Russians were wounded. (WWI -- Russia).

    Read More

  • The Hungarian Revolution of 1956

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    Following the death of Josef Stalin in 1953, the harsh policies he implemented in not only the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, but also its many satellite nations began to break down. There was a movement to distance all of the socialist nations from Stalin?s sadistic rule. In the Peoples? Republic of Hungary, there was much disillusionment with this Stalinist absolutism (Felkay 50). This disillusionment with the Soviet ideal of socialism lead the people of the fledgeling socialist state of Hungary to rise up in revolt, but ill-preparedness and the strength of the Soviet Red Army put down the insurrection within several days.

    Read More

  • The Collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe

    6159 Words  | 13 Pages

    to assume the role of dictator. This was a phenomenon which was to become a

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin

    1535 Words  | 4 Pages

    "From Autocracy to Oligarchy." The Structure of Soviet History: Essays and Documents. Ed. Ronald Grigor. Suny. New York: Oxford UP, 2003. 340-50. Print.

    Read More

  • Comparing Communism And Democracy In Poland

    1220 Words  | 3 Pages

    Communism and Democracy are two different kinds of philosophies that impacted Poland. Democracy is a political system of government, which is ruled by the people who elect representatives that are relied on to fulfil the society’s needs. Communism, on the other hand, is a political belief that is mainly concerned with equality. In Communism, everyone is treated equally when it comes to pay and their opinions, which people cannot have many of. Also in Communism, everyone has food, shelter, and economic support. When comparing Communism and Democracy, the reality is that they both affect the economy and the personal freedoms of the people. Poland today is a Democracy which has a prime minister. A prime minister is very similar to a president

    Read More

  • Marxism and Leninism

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.

    Read More

  • Dissolution Of The Soviet Union Essay

    1727 Words  | 4 Pages

    As with many important historical events throughout history the dissolution of the Soviet Union had many contributing forces. However, most historians agree that the main contributor was Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev and the many radical reforms he implemented during the six years he was the leader of the USSR. Even though the official dissolution took place in December 1991, the Soviet Union’s demise began to take form in the 1980s. In order to understand why the Soviet Union dissolved it is important to have a clear picture of its history and political climate.

    Read More

More about Transition from Communism in Belarus

Open Document