Trail Of Tears Dbq

624 Words2 Pages

The Trail Of Tears was the result of the Indian Removal Act where one of America’s largest forced migrations took place. The Indians had to endure a long journey in order to move to present day Georgia and through this journey, approximately four thousand were killed. The event took place after the law was ratified by seventh president of the United States, Andrew Jackson, in 1830. The migration relocated five civilized Native American tribes consisting of the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. This act was passed so Andrew Jackson could take over the land in the west that was occupied by the Indians. Andrew Jackson saw this as a beneficial opportunity for the Native Americans as well. Nonetheless, through different perspectives, that was wrong. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the Indians did not give the United States permission to pass the law. …show more content…

Therefore, the Indian Removal Act was not justified. Needless to say, an agreement is only properly made when both or multiple people involved in the deal give their approval and acceptance to whatever the agreement may be. In this case, with the Native Americans, they did not give their proper consent to the agreement according to the Cherokee appeal to Congress of December 1829. The tribe states, “[This] is the land of our nativity, and the land of our…birth. We cannot consent to abandon it…” This means, the Indians, and specifically the Cherokee tribe, did not give their permission to the law being passed. Knowing this, it was not right for the US to continue with the act since it was not agreed upon. Selfishly, the act was still passed and it forced the unhappy Indians to move. Because the Indians didn’t give their permission, it was quite obvious as to why they were unhappy. This goes on to demonstrate just how unjustified the Indian Removal Act

Open Document