A person should not do a tobacco advertisement that is against their own beliefs the answer is no. This paper will tackle why it is wrong for an advertiser to spend. “8.05 billion dollars ” for people to take part in a substance that is the only “legally available product in the United States that when ‘used as directed’ will kill the user and injure others. ” Kant even expressed a person’s action do not matter and the way a person act is the determining factor if their actions should be deemed ethical. Tobacco companies go against the American Marketing Association. There is ethical justification for non-tobacco products but for tobacco that is not the case. Marketing tobacco works, not only for adults, but it is also aimed at children. Then there is the lies that make tobacco companies look like the good guy.
Immanuel Kant who is a German philosopher based his ethics on the framework of deontological that said “fidelity to principle and duty are most important. ” This is where Kant stressed that a person’s actions do not matter, but the way a person acts is the determining factor if their actions are deemed ethical. Advertising effectiveness is what makes tobacco companies thrive on consumers. The American Marketing Association has three ethical standards that should be done. One is that marketers must do harm. Even though advertising its self is not causing harm the product is. About “56.8 million Americans are current smoker and 126. Million Americans are exposed to secondhand smoke. ” So this is a clear violation of do no harm. True they do put the Surgeon General’s Warning on each package, but it still does not stop the do no harm. The third is that marketers us embrace, communicate and practice the fundamental ethical va...
... middle of paper ...
...y. 2004. 20 March 2007. < http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>.
“Kant‟s Moral Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2004. 20 March 2007. < http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>.
“Online Glossary.” Pearson Prentice Hall. 2007. 3 April 2007. . http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/tobacco_industry/marketing/ “Brand Portfolio.” RJ Reynolds. 2007. 26 February 2007.
“Facts A La Carte.” Whudafxup with Big Tobacco?. 2007. 28 February 2007. . http://legacyforhealth.org/newsroom/statements/u.s.-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-tobacco-case-allows-lower-courts-findings-of-racketeering-and-fraud-by-the-tobacco-industry-to-stand http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/introduction/duty_1.shtml
My grandmother grew up in Americus, GA, a rural town over 100 miles south of Atlanta. Her parents were of Cherokee descent, so I asked her about any herbal remedies passed down to her. She told me of several, but the one that she remembered with the most clarity was rabbit tobacco.
Tobacco is the common name of the plant Nicotiana tabacum and N. rustica, found in the Nightshade family. It is a green, leafy plant and is known for the nicotine that lies within its leaves. Tobacco has more than 70 different species, but only two are used today. The most popular is N. tabacum and it has never been found to grow in the wild. Today, tobacco is smoked, chewed, and snuffed. It is grown throughout both North and South America. In the United States, its grown in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Virginia.
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Smoking is one of the leading causes of premature death world-wide. Anti-smoking advertisements, such as yours, are meant to inform people of the dangers of tobacco as well as discourage others from developing the bad habit. In order to successfully persuade your audience, the advertisement cleverly utilizes the three rhetorical appeals of ethos, logos, and pathos through its image and implied meanings.
Anti-smoking ads fight the cancerous substance and hope to transform the minds of many, or even the lives of many. It has become frequent in many advertisements to see the damage that smoking causes to someone and to others due to secondhand contact. Several anti-smoking advertisements are successful because they use the potential of death to scare people. The anti-smoking advertisement above is a prime example of this because it uses our fear of death to shame smokers into giving up smoking. The advertisement employs the three rhetorical appeals of logos, ethos, and pathos in its image and hinted meanings.
Tobacco is a powerful plant that has become extraordinarily affluent and in demand worldwide. It has been one of the most commonly used drugs throughout the past few centuries and it has a very long history. It dates back to the time of the Native Americans, but became increasingly popular when the Europeans arrived to America. At the time, it became very popular for trading. People traded spices, silk, food, and more, in exchange for tobacco. There are more than 70 different strains of tobacco. There are also numerous ways for one to consume tobacco including cigars, cigarettes, chewing tobacco, and flavored tobacco. Although not everyone consumes tobacco, tobacco affects everybody. Tobacco has drastic effects on the world and these effects impact everyone. Most importantly, tobacco influences our health drastically. There is a notable comparison between a person who does not smoke tobacco and a person who does. Tobacco also impacts everything around us. It drastically impacts our economy and our surrounding environments.
Now, cigarette ads include labels with warning signs, disturbing pictures of deceased unborn children, children with smoke formed into bags over their heads, people with amputated limbs, or pictures of gum and tooth decay. “Even if, as some enthusiasts claim, e-cigarettes can help a smoker quit, could it also entice young people to start?” (Are e-Cigarettes Safe?). Figure 3 contains an ad of a man smoking on a blu e-cig with the phrase ,“Why Quit? Switch To Blu”. This one ad out of many, surprisingly, contains a now required warning label at the bottom, warning pregnant or potentially pregnant consumers of the chance that their baby or reproductive system may be harmed. What some consumers don 't know, is that the e-cigarette owners are also the owners of the big tobacco cigarette companies. These companies clearly don 't want the smokers to quit smoking, but continue with what is argued as a “healthier”
Each day, millions of Americans of all ages light up a cigarette distributed by the tobacco companies. Smoking is a habit that, in the long run, causes cancer and other diseases associated with the lungs. Now, this deadly cancer causing drug is one of the leading causes of death in America today. Some may argue that it is a person¹s choice to smoke and that the tobacco companies are innocent because of this. In actuality, the tobacco companies are to blame for toying with the lives of millions of Americans. For many years, the tobacco companies have been keeping secrets from the American public and lied about the true effects of cigarette smoking causing our older generations¹ deaths. The tobacco companies now have warning labels on packs of cigarettes and are seeking another generation to kill by aiming their campaign at young teens that don¹t read labels. They are increasing the potency of the nicotine to ³hook² more smokers as well.
In 2008, 21% of adults in America aged 18 and older were current cigarette smokers while another 21% had been former smokers and 58% had smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their life, according to a CDC survey (Pleis 10). These statistics result in almost half of the United States population being smokers at one point in their life. The tobacco industry is huge in order to provide cigarettes to the quarter of Americans that currently smoke. The statistics that resulted from the survey did not even include other types of tobacco products, which are just as harmful. However, even realizing the harm that tobacco products can cause, tobacco companies use a variety of devious methods to draw people in to buy their product, especially younger people. With all of the money flowing in from their consumers, tobacco companies lobby very heavily in Congress and the House to prevent laws and regulations that will cut into their profits. According to tobaccofreekids.org, the tobacco industry spent $10.6 million to lobby Congress in the first half of 2003 (Tobacco-Free Kids). Organizations such as the American Legacy Foundation are annoyed by the lies that big tobacco companies tell; they decided to bring the truth out into the open. The aptly named “truth” campaign opposes the tactics that tobacco businesses use to advertise their product, and the campaign has decided to fight against the lies to provide the truth about cigarettes and tobacco. The truth campaign’s anti-smoking ads present a stunning portrayal of smoking that reflects the influence tobacco companies have on youth while also illustrating the consequences of addiction and use.
Tobacco companies should be prevented from using advertising tactics that target teenagers. There has always been controversy as to how tobacco companies should prevent using advertising tactics to target teenagers. As controversial as this is tobacco companies shouldn’t advertise teen smoking. Many teens may be lured to believe cigarette advertising because it has been part of the American Culture for years, magazine ads and the media target young people, and these companies receive a drastic increase financially; however, the advertising by these cigarette companies has disadvantages such as having to campaign against their own company, limiting their cigarette advertising and becoming a controversial dilemma as to encouraging teenagers to smoke. From billboards to newspaper advertisements, cigarette promotions started becoming part of the American Culture.
There are two types of people in the world, people who smoke and people who do not. Accordingly to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), current smoking has declined from nearly 21 of every 100 adults (20.9%) in 2005 to nearly 18 of every 100 adults (17.8%) in 2013. However, there are many ads to promote companies, whose goal is to end smoking for good. But still remains many people around the world of different ages, still hooked on the addictive killer, cigarettes. So are the advertisements enough? I came across two ads that caught my eye. They both have the same goal, which is to end smoking, but both differ to appeal to audiences. The first ad I had came across was from the company, Chilean Corporation Against Cancer (CONAC). The ad pictures a child crying and screaming as if the smoke was suffocating him like how a plastic bag would. As well as using the phrase, “Smoking isn’t just suicide. It’s murder.” in the ad to send a message. The second ad I came across was from a smoking
The tobacco industry is a very unethical industry, due to the long term effects of tobacco on humans. The industry also does not assess the ethical and social responsibility the best way that it should. There are many factors that make the industry unethical; some of the reasons are the way the cigarette companies around the world Advertise, the way governments and cigarette companies make a huge profit from the sales of cigarettes, and the labeling health risks. I do believe however that there is something that the tobacco companies can do to better their strategy as far as their ethics go. I think that they should, always be looking for the best interest on their consumers, as well as advertise strictly on the effects that the cigarettes and what the people are getting for their money.
Should tobacco and alcohol advertising be allowed on television? The ban on advertising tobacco is already in affect, however, alcohol is another harmful substance. Should liquor be allowed to be advertised, if tobacco can not advertise their product? The ban on advertising tobacco products on television and radio, was passed through legislation in 1970 by Richard Nixon. This argument like others out there has two sides, one side in favor these advertisements and the other against these advertisements. Since both of these substances are highly addictive and costly. Would we like to see these advertisements continued? Are these advertisements the hazard they are communicated to be? Through the research of these two important sides, this essay will explore which side has a stronger stance on the topic.
Big brands like Marlboro spend 70% of their profits on advertisements in 3rd world countries to try and get the people who do not know the consequences of smoking.In total tobacco companies spend over ten billion dollars on advertisement world wide. (who.int) The advertisement that is going on is on the covers are are cartoon animals and images that show if you smoke you will be
Tobacco is made from dried up tobacco leaves prepared with chemicals to create products such as: chewing tobacco, dip, and loose tobacco to be smoked on cigarettes and pipes. There is a demand for tobacco and if companies were to stop making tobacco, then another company will sell it due to supply and demand. Even though people do choose to buy tobacco products on their own free will. Tobacco companies are partly to blame for smoking related illnesses and deaths since they knowingly create a product that is harmful, in addition, they try to appeal to a younger audience, and lastly, tobacco products are highly addictive.