To What Extent Was Napoleon's Rule A Success

531 Words2 Pages

Napoleon's rule over France was largely successful. His government was stable and made considerable progress on achieving the ideals set forth by the revolutionaries in 1789. However, Napoleon's rule was not completely successful - he had failed to address or even regressed upon some of the revolutionary ideals. First of all, the greatest success of Napoleon's rule was his introduction of a unified national legal system. The Napoleonic code (introduced 1804) was a success since it preserved the social aims of the revolution such as equality in the eyes of the law and also guaranteed civil liberties like freedom of religion. Furthermore, the code couldn't be challenged by regional traditions and local rights, thus unifying the country under …show more content…

Women did not enjoy equal rights under his rule. For example, Napoleon's law of the family monarchy dictated that a man could file for divorce on grounds of adultery. On the other hand, a man had to cohabit with his mistress for two years before a woman could justify a divorce. As it can be seen, Napoleon's rule wasn't completely successful since he had failed to ensure equality for all French citizens. Likewise, Napoleon's failure to ensure universal suffrage in France was another sign that his rule wasn't completely successful. Women couldn't vote and a man had to have earnings of more than 150 francs to participate. This often excluded the lower classes like the peasantry, who had no political representation. The failure of universal suffrage in France showed that Napoleon's rule was unsuccessful in some regards. As it can be seen, Napoleon's rule was, to a large extent, successful. He had achieved stability after years of chaos and he had progressed on some revolutionary ideals while also healing the wounds inflicted by past French governments. As a result, it's rather clear that Napoleon's government did mostly succeed after years of

Open Document