Tim O Brien On The Rainy River Analysis

880 Words2 Pages

Society has implemented an ever-changing set of social normalities that are followed by citizens but are not always enforced by a physical force. These standards often place men as the fighters, the reinforcement for civilization. Not all people believe in these ideals that are placed though, often putting their own beliefs before those of the collective. Tim O’Brien displays this conflict of interests through his story “On The Rainy River” which is a tale of his conscription into the Vietnam War and the internal battle of either facing fate or deserting. Emotional courage gives the strength to deal with separation, especially if it is an internal separation of morals and instinct. Going against the social norms require immense amounts of emotional …show more content…

This safe space can often provide a false sense of security to those that do not prepare themselves for the possibility of being removed from safety. O’Brien faces this fact when his conscription notice arrives. O’Brien could never understand the war, he saw “no unity of purpose,” (O'Brien, 173) He has always believed that he was above the war, that he was “too smart, too compassionate” (O’Brien, 173) for the war, but the conflict has no standards. He was forced to make a decision, either fight for his country and face death head-on or flee to Canada and face harassment and disappointment by his family and members of his community. He decided to leave for Canada in order to preserve himself and his ideals, where he meets Elroy Berdahl. He takes O’Brien to the border on a lake, in order to give him some mental clarity to make his decision. He realizes the folly in his decision and returns to America in order to fight in the war. He may have been pushed out of his comfort zone by fighting in the war but he still does not understand why “certain blood was being split for uncertain reasons”(O’Brien, 173), thus holding onto his

Open Document