Three Popular Circuses In The 19th Century

1149 Words3 Pages

Circuses were meant to entertain people. They usually traveled from city to city staying one or two nights at a time and then leaving. The circuses were presented in theaters that had ramps and a full orchestra down in front of the stage. While at the circus you would see people dancing on the backs of horses along with doing ballets and Italian shadow plays. Circuses now a days are a lot different than they were when they first began in the 18th and 19th Centuries. The circus has had very interesting performers. Circuses in the 19th century were very entertaining to the people who were watching them. They were excited and always smiling while attending these circuses. The acts were very high energy and kept the audience drawn in. …show more content…

The three main circuses around that you hear about are The Big Apple Circus, Cirque du Soleil, and Ringling Brothers and the Barnum & Bailey Circus. Each one of these circuses are different in special ways and them being different is what makes them interesting. This is because if all of them were the same you wouldn’t want to see them all. The Big Apple Circus is different from the others because “Following what seemed to be an evolving performance style for America’s nouveau circus, the Big Apple Circus utilized its intimate tent setting to create themed shows and featured perennial clown Barry “Grandma” Lubin, who would become New York’s signature circus icon.” (Williams51) The Big Apple Circus has wow factor, they are into giving the audience a thrill and a shock and that is how they really draw the audience in. Cirque du Soleil is a lot different from the other circuses “Cirque du Soleil also requires its performers to undergo rigorous training at its campus in Montreal. And unlike most circuses that are a collection of acts, talents are developed to fit a role created by Cirque’s artistic creators and designers. Perhaps blending of old with new, reality and fantasy and circus with theatre imparts a feeling to the audience that the genre has somehow changed, transgressed accepted performance modes and perhaps moved on to newer performance spaces and narratives.”

Open Document