There Will Come Soft Rains: A Comparative Analysis

1203 Words3 Pages

As the years progress, technology keeps on improving and is reaching to the point of artificial intelligence. Throughout the history, many inventors came up with innovative ideas to improve technology. However, these advancements have led to few ethical, environmental and moral issues which have affected the way the society behaves and what values it holds. This correlates to these short stories, I, Robot by Isaac Asimov, August 2026: There Will Come Soft Rains by Ray Bradbury, “City People” by Lydia Davis, and Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. These short stories show how advancements in technology leads to reduction in our ability to think critically, and makes us feel lonely in a world full of machines with no sense of humanity. Technological …show more content…

Here, the house repeats this quote even after it has been burned. In this case, Bradbury shows how an automated machine continues to execute its pre-programmed tasks. Also, Bradbury is telling the society that automated things may overtake humanity as their ability to perform tasks is not easily destructible. Furthermore, Bradbury wrote this story in terms of how the modern society views and acknowledges its surroundings. Bradbury states, “… the silhouette in paint of a man moving a lawn … a photograph, a woman bent to pick flowers … a small boy, hands flung into the air....” (23). Clearly, this quote shows how the modern society devalues humanity and objectifies it by stating that they were just “… five spots of paint.” In contrast, Bradbury gives the automated house more characteristics than the humans mentioned in this short story. The house was personified and given the ability to express its feelings during its demise. Clearly, this shows how machines can act like humans by being programmed to learn human …show more content…

The book, I, Robot, has a series of short stories which show how the robots develop the ability to think and perform the tasks for the humans. The robots, however, have laws which they cannot break. The laws are, “A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm … A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law … A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. (Asimov 26). These laws seem promising and allows the reader to think that these robots must be harmless. However, the robots start to think for themselves as the story progresses. The robots begin to get irritated by the human commands. A robot named Cutie argues,
“Look at you … The material you are made of is soft and flabby, lacking endurance and strength, depending for energy upon the inefficient oxidation of organic material. I … am a finished product. I absorb electrical energy directly and utilize it with an almost one hundred percent efficiency. I am composed of strong metal, am continuously conscious, and can stand extremes of environment easily.” (Asimov

Open Document