Theory Of Procrastination

716 Words2 Pages

Tatiana Malatincova, in her article “The Mystery of ‘Should’: Procrastination, Delay, and Reactance in Academic Settings,” argues that procrastination primarily depends on the individual’s own view of his/her freedom that they think they have to complete an assignment. Through the Theory of Psychological Reactance, the determining of “trait reactance”, and the three conceptual variable of procrastinating, support is provided to her conclusion. All of these steer towards saying that the magnitude of the assignment merely has no effect on the task delay time, which is questionable. There’s more to procrastination than just simply delaying a task; “procrastination is the lack or deficiency of self-regulation skill” (Yesil 2012). In all the variables involved, the magnitude and importance of an assignment definitely plays in the decision-making role of when to complete a task. The perceived freedom one has can be threatened if there are a multitude of assignments to be done simultaneously, and(or) if a
The first one is explained to be a habit of delaying academic assignments past the “optimal point.” Self-reported task procrastination is on the lines of the self-criticism depending on the different circumstances. Delay is basically just the time one starts on a task before the deadline. All of these variables are intertwined in the concept that procrastination is all based on the time given to complete an assignment, never, again, on how big or how long the task will take. If a task seems it’ll only take 5-30 minutes to complete, it’ll increase the delayal of it because the lack of seriousness considered regarding its threat to our freedom. On the other hand, if a task is thought to take at least an hour, early action will be taken, due to a natural sense of priority that people usually

Open Document