The Taste For Civilization Gregory Orr Analysis

1662 Words4 Pages

Personal Civility: How Does it Prevent Political Change?

Civility can be defined as, the formal politeness and courtesy in behavior or speech. Referring to respect and manners demonstrated throughout our lives. Civility has many different interpretations because everyone perceives it differently. It all depends on how each individual understands civility and whether or not they choose to respect it. One could be raised in a household that strongly reinforces civility, but it is up to that someone to abide by those standards. “The Taste for Civilization: Food, Politics, and Civil Society,” by Janet Flammang depicts how manners are a key factor in helping individuals deal with everyday issues aside from the dinner table. Gregory Orr in “Return …show more content…

It is not expected that everyone will choose to live by the same standards, but if there is a mutual respect for everyone’s beliefs it would be easier to work towards change. Orr talks about the maltreatment that everyone in the civil rights movement received due to the policemen’s opposing beliefs. “If they had actually wanted to protect us, the FBI could have easily arrived any time the preceding day. Many in the movement already knew what was inconceivable to me at the time- that events like this were stage-managed and that the FBI wasn’t a friend or even a neutral ally of the civil rights movement.” (Orr 223) This is a problem because with the lack of enforcement citizens are free to do what they want without receiving any consequences. This of course is only applicable to scenarios that policemen and citizens have the same view on. Regardless if a law seems unjust or disagreeable, it must be followed by everyone. By letting personal civility override the legal system, the opportunity for an altercation is being presented. Oppression is a prevalent issue that is more than often eluded in the legal system. For example, police brutality may be prevailing in a manner that is not agreeable to the public. The reason this may be possible is because policemen may have the same morals as each other, blinding them to their wrongdoings. And while they may consider themselves civilized, citizens may consider them uncivilized. This is why it is difficult to make changes because with everyone’s personal interpretation of civility, it is difficult to come to an agreement. Flammang may agree that, everyone’s view on civility is different also because it is not taught the same. “We are not naturally polite- we teach and learn the rules that grease the wheels of civilizations. Of course, if

Open Document