The Structure of Power in American Society by C. Wright Mills
analytical Essay
812 words
Psychology:
Psychology is a social science that aims to study the mind and the behaviors of humans. It aims to understand what drives humans to act the way they do. It differs from sociology and anthropology in that it takes accounts the individual rather than society as a whole.
Sociology:
Sociology is the study of the relationships that humans have with each other and social institutions. It aims to understand the links that exist between individuals and the social structures around them and also the functions that these social institutions perform in society.
Anthropology:
Anthropology is the study of humans through the ages. It aims to understand different cultures and practices that have existed from the origins of mankind as well. It differs from sociology in that it takes into account humans and cultures that no longer exist.
The Structure of Power in American Society:
C. Wright Mills in his article “ The Structure of Power in American Society” writes that when considering the types of power that exist in modern society there are three main types which are authority, manipulation and coercion. Coercion can be seen as the “last resort” of enforcing power. On the other hand, authority is power that is derived from voluntary action and manipulation is power that is derived unbeknownst to the people who are under that power.
It is discussed how the indifference to politics by many citizens of western society and the fact that ideologies are now no longer needed by those in power to enforce their will are two key truths of western politics.
In some societies it is the actions of many men that change the environment to which they belong and this in turn makes up history. However in other societies such as the United States and R...
... middle of paper ...
... beacon of hope for liberals and what Mills believes is the lower level of power is the public or the masses. The public is defined as those who have no defined or well structured interests. Mills is of the opinion that their political influence is also decreasing and that they are being guided by the media and other forms of mass communication which is controlled by the ruling elite.
Lastly Mills highlights how a truly democratic state can be achieved. There is a need for a public that acts a medium for true political change, skilled men who form the higher powers of the state and have no vested corporate interests, dependable parties that debate openly and lucidly the problems faced by the world and finally liberated institutions between the public and the elite that act as proponent for the public opinion.
Personal analysis through a psychological perspective:
In this essay, the author
- Explains that psychology is a social science that aims to study the mind and the behaviors of humans. it differs from sociology and anthropology in that it takes accounts of the individual rather than society.
- Explains that sociology is the study of the relationships that humans have with each other and social institutions. it aims to understand the links between individuals and the social structures around them.
- Explains that anthropology is the study of humans through the ages. it aims to understand different cultures and practices that have existed from the origins of mankind.
- Analyzes the three main types of power that exist in modern society: authority, manipulation, and coercion.
Related
- analytical
- opinionated
- Max Weber's Theory Of Power Essayanalytical essayMax Weber developed a concept of power explaining 3 sources of it. Relatively to sources he distinguished charismatic, traditional and legal types of authority. Richard Emerson continued to work on the concept of power. He studies power-dependence relation and looks deeper on its nature. Emerson explains that dependency of one subject - B (person or group) from the other subject A (person or group) develops, when there is a desirable goal or need and limitation on its availability and when subject A can facilitate in reaching of this goal. At the same moment subject A develop a power upon subject B. The definition of power suggested in the article is an ability to overcome resistance. Thus subject A can force subject B to overcome resistance to something that he does not want to do in exchange of a desirable goal or reward. The goal in this context could be love or friendship or any other thing that can be a valuable yet unavailable for one and
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how max weber developed a concept of power explaining 3 sources of it. emerson studies power-dependence relation and looks deeper on its nature.
- Explains that the national academy of science started a study in the western electric, led by elton mayo, to define the reliance of illumination on the work efficiency.
- Explains that researchers were not ready to give up an idea of studying the effect of working conditions on productivity, so they started a new experiment to eliminate external conditions that could influence the study.
- Explains that 1928 researchers started interviewing workers, trying to collect relevant human data. researchers were looking at the workers as human beings, listening to their stories about social conditions.
- Describes the experiment in the bank wiring observation room where 14 workmen were placed in one room. they were asked to do the job as a group under condition that the more they do earn more.
770 wordsRead More - What Is The Unjust Power Of The Power Elite?analytical essayMills highlights the unjust power of the power elite for imposing their power in an organized and planned manner, infringing on the democratic and political rights of those who are not part of the power elite.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how c. wright mills describes the shift in national power to advantage those who are part of these three institutions. they highlight the unjust power of the power elite for imposing their power in an organized and planned manner.
- Illustrates how the legal system works by the experience of the poor and people of color with social institutions.
- Explains that the criminal justice system puts the poor and people of color in their socioeconomic status and not providing them with any opportunities to come out of their poverty.
- Analyzes how the documentary "born rich" highlights the power imbalances in the lives of the wealthy. they have the right access to schools because of their wealth and power.
1019 wordsRead More - John Stuart Mill's Considerations On Representative Governmentanalytical essayIn Considerations on Representative Government, Mill denounces the idea that a despotic monarchy headed by a good despot is the best form of government. Mill goes on to share the reason behind this idea. The reason lies in the supposition that a distinguished individual with absolute power will ensure that all the duties of government is performed intelligently and virtuously. Mill does not disagree with this belief but he finds the need to address it. He states that an “all-seeing” monarch rather than a “good monarch” is needed. The despot would need to be informed correctly and in detail at all time, and be able to oversee every division of administration with effective attention and care in the twenty-four hours per day he has. If not, the
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how mill denounces the idea that a despotic monarchy headed by an absolute power is the best form of government.
- Analyzes how mill asserts that a good despotism is an entirely false ideal. mill concludes by informing us on the best form of government.
- Agrees with mill that despotic monarchy is a false ideal. communism looks good in theory but is absolutely terrible in reality.
557 wordsRead More - John Stuart Mills On Liberty Analysisanalytical essayIn On Liberty by John Stuart Mills, he presents four arguments regarding freedom of expression. According to Mills, we should encourage free speech and discussion, even though it may oppose a belief you deem to be true. Essentially, when you open up to other opinions, Mills believes you will end up closer to the truth. Instead of just accepting something as true because you are told, Mills argues that accepting both sides will make you understand why your side is true or false. Mills is persuasive in all four of his claims because as history would show, accepting both sides of an argument is how society improves.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes john stuart mills' four arguments regarding freedom of expression in on liberty. he argues that accepting both sides of an argument is how society improves.
- Analyzes mills' argument that when someone's opinion is being silenced by another, they assume that their beliefs are to be true.
- Explains that mills believes that the people who "silence" people the most would be the catholic church.
- Explains mills' second argument that when we hear an opinion, we unconsciously believe it is true or false. the general or prevailing opinion on an subject is rarely or never the whole truth.
- Analyzes how mills' second argument is persuasive because it explains that there is no right answer when it comes to your moral code.
- Analyzes how mills makes the point that even false opinions shouldn't be silenced because they help us comprehend why we believe.
- Analyzes how mills' fourth argument discusses the importance of learning and understanding our own opinions. he believes that experience is important when making an argument.
654 wordsRead More - The Writings of John Stuart Millanalytical essayThe writings of John Stuart Mill have been viewed as a pathway to becoming an individual and support for liberalism. Mill’s work On Liberty, promotes individuality as important for the positive progression of society and as good for everyone. Individualism is seen as necessary to having a progressive society that is accepting of other thoughts and lifestyles. The opinions of others is thought of as to be necessary to society, and “are rested not so much on its truth.” Mill writes from the Utilitarian view, which is taking actions that would most likely help the greatest amount of people, and this view looks at what a society should do and not what society is actually doing. Within his writings, Mill set out to solve the issue of how to be an individual that will be capable of escaping the possible oppression from the government or the tyranny of the majority but there are two weak points within the writings. First, there is inequalities created by the economy that are present in society, and second, there is the possible creation of oppression of the freedom of press by the individuality.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how mill's writings have been viewed as a pathway to becoming an individual and support for liberalism.
- Explains that tyranny of the majority and despotism of custom are obstacles that confront individuality.
- Opines that government should not have a state education but only provide an examination for proficiency in reading and basic subjects. people must actively participate in society without the need of "the officers of government."
- Explains that mills provides solutions to the obstacles that prevent the formation of individualism.
- Explains that the creation of character is the work of exposing individuals to various opinions and having an environment that encourages debate. mill believes truths are opinions that should not become superstition.
- Explains that finding truths can create character that is necessary to be an individual. discussions expose the flaws within the opinions of opposing parties.
- Argues that mill's solutions to finding individualism with the presence of oppression did suffer from its shortcomings. mill believes that the doctrine of free trade should be present in a society.
- Opines that individualism needs free speech to neutralize the ideas behind mill's argument. the press has the ability to silence the voice of the minority causing the decline of individualists.
- Analyzes how mill had these ideals in his writings and presented solutions to achieving individualism, but his solutions appear unfinished. mill is asking too much of a society with pre-established obstacles to overcome.
1646 wordsRead More - In conlclusion, Mill’s notions of the government’s paternal role is praiseworthy but if looked at more closely it can create a lot of problems which Mill maybe overlooked.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that academic study has frequently engaged with the question of what form of government is ideal and what should be the goal of the government.
- Opines that a good government should take advantage of the existing good faculties and contribute to the improvement of those qualities. if the government monopolizes the discourse on what constitutes good, it becomes interventionist.
- Argues that since the government will be truly representative, and people must have wisely chosen good representatives, all the policies that they advocate would be justified and supported.
- Argues that locke's government is to preserve the life, liberty, and property of the people and to keep peace.
- Compares locke and mill's assumptions about the kind of people who will constitute the government. mill believes that a representative government can only be formed under ideal circumstances.
- Argues that locke's model is not inclusionary, while mill believes that the minority must speak for itself in the government.
- Analyzes how mill posits that there are stages in the advancement of people and different forms of government suit different people.
- Analyzes how mill and locke are critical of the notion of absolute monarchy or despotism but for different reasons.
- Opines that mill's notions of the government’s paternal role are praiseworthy, but if looked at more closely it can create a lot of problems which mill may have overlooked.
1825 wordsRead More - John Stuart Mill's 'On Liberty'analytical essayJohn Stuart Mill was a very influential Western Philosopher who had a different conception of liberty. Mill believed that it was necessary for society to have individualism. In his work “On Liberty” Mill tries to argue that the only time an authoritative body has the right to interfere with an individual is when it is for their own protection. (Quote) To back his argument Mill discusses three kinds of freedom he thinks a free society should have: 1. Freedom of thought and opinion, 2. The pursuit of ones own ends, and 3. How much power does an authoritative body have over an individual.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that john stuart mill was an influential western philosopher who believed that it was necessary for society to have individualism. mill discusses three kinds of freedom he thinks a free society should have:
- Explains that mill believes that a governing body should not restrict freedom of thought and opinion and that people should be able to come to their own conclusions on issues.
- Analyzes how mill argues that without criticism and discourse one cannot be confident in the idea that their beliefs are correct.
- Argues that freedom of thought and opinion is beneficial for society because it allows for advancement via ideas. mill believes that adults should be able to come to their own conclusion about how they interpret life.
- Analyzes how mill discusses ity a governing body should have over an individual. he thinks that individuals should not be allowed to harm others and that freedom of opinion be restricted if it harms others.
707 wordsRead More - John Stuart Mill's On Libertyanalytical essayIn 1859, a philosopher named John Stuart Mill wrote a book called On Liberty which discusses his defense of “toleration” in a liberalistic view. This view intertwines with the concept of utilitarianism, a system that Mill contributed to so drastically, that even after 154 years of possible obliteration from reviewers, his efforts, but more importantly his work, has not only been approved, but also embraced, thanks to its highly appropriate symbolism. This book has postulated some philosophical questions, and through his five chapters, he discusses his favoring of toleration, but only to a certain extent.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how john stuart mill's book, on liberty, discusses his defense of "toleration" in a liberalistic view, intertwines with the concept of utilitarianism.
- Analyzes mill's concept of "liberty," which is reflected and supported in many doctrines. mill refutes the idea that humans can exercise their basic rights, but cannot abuse them.
- Analyzes how john mill's argument about true beliefs being good for society deals with the plausibility of the majority being right and the minority being wrong.
- Explains that john mill believes that if one understands truth, one should respond to arguments about the valid statement and that people use liberty to argue, in example, free of harm.
- Analyzes john stuart mill's defense of toleration. he believes that some ways of life are better than others and that we shouldn't tolerate every way.
925 wordsRead More - John Stuart Mill's On Libertyanalytical essayJohn Stuart Mill's On Liberty Imagine going through life not questioning anything that anyone tells you. Anything that is said to be true you would just agree with and not question the statement for yourself. Imagine how blindly you would go through life not finding anything out for yourself. A good example of this is something that just happened to me today. I have always been told that the population of the United States is 240 million and I have been told that for the longest time, even recently within the last month.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how john stuart mill illustrates this point in his book, on liberty.
- Explains that mill claims that we may not interfere with a person’s liberty unless her or his acting freely will bring harm to others.
- Analyzes how mill anticipates objections to his claim and tries to resolve them. the issue of agreement/disagreement has no relationship to the validity of the statement.
- Opines that mill's answer to these questions is that the more and more opinions that are obtained inevitably, it is not necessarily true that all the consequences of them will be good.
587 wordsRead More - Sociology and the Education System in Americaopinionated essayThe definition of Sociology is that it is the study of human societies through the synthesis of theoretical analysis and controlled research, focusing on the social patterns and forces that influence humans.
In this essay, the author
- Defines sociology as the study of human societies through the synthesis of theoretical analysis and controlled research, focusing on the social patterns and forces that influence humans.
- Explains that sociology focuses on groups, or society as a whole, but it should not exclude an emphasis on individuals because individuals form groups and groups produce individuals.
- Explains sociology's systematic study of relationships among people. it describes and seeks to explain social processes that give rise to, sustain, and change our social world.
- Explains that there is a strong undercurrent of racial inequality in today's school systems that negatively affect the quality of education that its students receive.
- Explains that some of the best high schools in the nation are magnet schools, private schools or suburban schools that serve the upper class.
- Compares the environments of good schools and mediocre ones. private schools are clean with air conditioning and have huge libraries and computer labs filled with new computers.
- Compares how public schools serve the lower class and middle class minorities who can't afford to pay for a better education or are unable to find transportation to suburban schools.
- Compares public schools to private schools in that they are filthy, have no air conditioning, don't have enough books for all students, and have a small library that doubles as classroom during the day.
- Explains that students attending public schools skip classes and miss days in school, and violence is a common event.
- Opines that inadequate funding, lack of college prep classes and programs, parent involvement, weak administration, teacher student apathy, and an undercurrent of racism almost guarantee the failure of poor and middle class minority students.
- Explains that most educators have given up on the idea that all schools can be free of segregation. minority families tend to gravitate toward larger cities in search of more blue-collar jobs.
- Opines that the government is unable to provide every student with an equal opportunity to learn or they just don't care about lower class and middle class minorities enough to try and make a change.
- Opines that the education system should be more equal to everyone, regardless of the school system. private schools produce kids that are more presentable, but in no way smarter than public schools.
1140 wordsRead More