The Reformation Dbq

1646 Words4 Pages

The Reformation that took place in the sixteenth century saw the fragmentation of Catholic Europe under new religious ideas and practices. One factor causing debate is the role Martin Luther played in the spread of the Reformation. A Reformation, seen in the context of Sixteenth Century life, can be identified as ‘a return right back to the beginning’. In this sense, Luther’s intention can be seen as an attempt to return the church back to where it should be. It has been argued by modern contemporary historians that Luther’s contribution was limited due to the presence of existing reformers and rivals and the idea that Luther was unable to unite a coherent force meaning his role in the Reformation has been exaggerated. However, when …show more content…

Rublack focuses on the reformers John Wyclif and Jan Hus, who maintained the idea that the ‘king and nobility should reform the church, returning it to a truly spiritual life and deprive it of all secular dominion and property’. This ideal is reflected in Luther’s opposition to indulgences, which he saw as an abuse and violation of the intention of confession and penance. This therefore contextualizes the long process of reform in Europe and suggests that although ideas of Reformation existed before, they only came to a head in the sixteenth century. Despite the clear influences Luther made use of, it is evident that he was the first reformer to directly challenge and threaten the Catholic Church. Whilst his use of existing ideas made by historians that predate him has been used as a criticism of Luther’s work, it can also be seen to demonstrate Luther’s ability in creating a public debate whereby previous figures had failed to do so. This can be attributed to Luther’s use of innovative techniques such as his wide use of the printing press in spreading …show more content…

Cohn asserts that Luther’s actions were detrimental in the spread of the Revolution meaning that later Reformers, such as Calvin, learned from Luther’s mistakes and took a different course of action. Evidence for this comes from examples of peasant revolts and rebellions whereby Luther’s teachings were confused with other local religious leaders. These teachings encouraged peasant revolts, such as the one in 1524-26 whereby peasants used the idea of recourse to ‘divine law’ as justification for their actions. Although these actions weren’t representative of Luther’s teachings, he has often been blamed for allowing these ideas to develop into risings that were damaging to the Revolution. In addition to this, once the revolts were settled, peasants reverted back to Catholicism, thus suggesting Luther’s inability of truly converting the peasants. However, as previously stated, more often than not, Luther was successful in spreading and encouraging teachings amongst the wider population. He adapted his methods of teaching so that all members of society could understand. He made use of anecdotes to explain his teachings to the illiterate, for example his ‘advice for a barber’ tale. Therefore, despite the existence of cases whereby Luther was unsuccessful in spreading the Reformation, his methods of teaching can still be seen as hugely innovative and

Open Document