The Pros And Cons Of Construction Waste

710 Words2 Pages

Due to rapid urbanization, large infrastructures are being developed, which undergo renovation and modification from time to time, generating a huge volume of construction waste. Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste materials, generated by various construction and demolition activities are normally referred to as solid wastes. Construction waste is a solid wastes from the construction, remodeling and repairing of individual residences, commercial buildings, and other civil engineering structures. Demolition wastes are defined as the wastes from demolished buildings and roads. The modern world generates huge amounts of waste, which imposes a lot of pressure on the environment. Construction and demolition (C&D) waste materials are normally …show more content…

Additionally, natural calamities like earthquake may lead to destruction of strcutures, creating significant amount of solid demolition waste. Construction and demolition (C&D) waste includes waste from demolished structures, renovations in the real estate sector and construction and repair of roads, flyovers, bridges, etc. A primary component of these construction and demolition wastes is building derived materials. Proper disposal of these solid wastes is an area of prime concern in the modern world, especially in the developing countries.. Globally, cities generate about 1.3 billion tons of solid waste per year. This volume is expected to increase to 2.2 billion tons by 2025, says a 2012 report by the World Bank. Building materials account for approximately half of all materials used and about half the solid waste generated worldwide. But C&D waste can be an invaluable source of building material. In fact, the recent debate in India over sand mining has put the spotlight on the need to recycle, reuse and substitute naturally sourced building material (such as …show more content…

Moreover, the demolition of concrete structures and disposal of the associated wastes is an environmental problem. Rejected construction materials and building derived materials (BDM) constitutes the single largest portion of these wastes, amounting to 2.40 – 3.67 million tonnes per annum (Meyer, 2004). For example, in the US, approximately 49% of the utility wastes (e.g. fly ash which can be produced while generating electricity from coal) are simply landfilled, 41% are contained in surface impoundments, and about 10% are disposed of by discharging into old quarry operations (Provis and van Deventer, 2009). Thus, it is imperative to adopt innovative technqiues to utilize rejected concrete wherever applicable, instead of producing fresh

More about The Pros And Cons Of Construction Waste

Open Document