The Pros And Cons Of Conflict Theory

1713 Words4 Pages

The theoretical framework in a research relates to the philosophical basis in which the research is executed. It also forms the link between the theoretical aspect of the research and the practical aspect of the investigation. Merten (1998) stated that it “has implications for every decision made in the research process” (p.3). Therefore, the starting point to any research proposal is to identify the methodologies (methods that can be used in the project and as well justify their choice (Crotty, 1998). The methodologies relate to “the strategy, plan of action, processes or design lying behind the choice and use of particular methods, and linking the choice and use of methods to the desired outcomes” (Crotty, 1998, p. 3). Furthermore, the methods applied convey “the techniques or procedures used to gather and analyze data that is …show more content…

However, this change could be political struggles or revolution. The theory lays emphasis on the idea that personal or group’s ability has a role to play in exercising influence and control over others in producing social order. Therefore, conflict theorists are of the belief that there is a continual struggle between all different elements of a particular society. Wallace and Wolf (2006) revealed that conflict theory developed as a major alternative to the functionalist approach to analyzing a society’s general structure. Similarly, Ritzer (2003) also noted that apart from the origination of the theory in reaction to structural functionalism, it also has other roots which include Marxian theory and works of George Simmel on social conflict. However, this was superseded by a variety of neo-Marxian theories after the 60s (Ritzer & Goodman, 2004). Notably, this has become increasingly popular and relevant in modern day sociology (Wallace & Wolf,

Open Document