The Progressive Era

986 Words2 Pages

Upon its conception, America has been politically divided. Since European settlers first colonized Jamestown in what is now Virginia, there has always been room for argument. In their case, they probably often feuded over where and when to plant certain crops, and when to harvest them. Jumping ahead to the age of colonial America, the Continental Congress argued over whether to remain with, or declare independence from Great Britain, America’s mother country. After America gained its independence from Great Britain, it was brought to the attention of the American leaders that a constitution needed to be drafted - an auxiliary set of laws to preside over the whole nation. The founding fathers had differing political views, but they compromised …show more content…

Progressives wanted to eliminate problems caused by industrialization, urbanization, immigration and government corruption, and they wanted to do it through changes in the constitution. They drew support from a wide range of people all over the country. One of their main points was enabling the citizenry to rule more directly, and they passed reforms such as referendums, recall provisions, and primary elections. They passed amendments 16, 17, 18, and 19 to the Constitution. The 16th allowed an income tax, the 17th allowed for direct election of senators, the 18th made alcohol illegal (Prohibition), and the 19th gave women the right to vote. Many of today’s regulatory agencies were created during this time (Faith, The Progressive Era). Leading members of the republican party, including Elihu Root, William Howard Taft, and Henry Cabot Lodge, opposed the progressive movement. They regarded progressivism as a threat to the constitution. The term “conservative” comes from these men, because they wanted to “conserve” the American constitutional principles. The election of 1912 was important because the conservatives felt that Theodore Roosevelt’s programs were progressive, even though he was a republican. They thought his proposals, such as recalling judges by popular vote, went against the rule of law; they believed he had little respect for …show more content…

During World War II, 1939 to 1945, concerns were foreign policy and national defense. Republicans, as usual, were for a small and limited federal government, and democrats favored the federal government taking the lead role in providing services for the citizens of the country. In the 1930’s, both the American public and congress shared the foreign policy opinion of isolationism; they believed the U.S. should not get involved in European events. In 1940, it seemed that Britain could fall to Hitler, and political debate grew between isolationists and interventionists. President Roosevelt was an interventionist, but avoided the issue. The republicans were generally more isolationists, but Wendell Wilkie was an interventionist like Roosevelt, and won the republican nomination for the Presidency. However, Roosevelt made a famous pledge that he would not send Americans into a foreign war, and he was re-elected. Isolationism was weakening by 1941 and congress passed the Lend-Lease Act which supplied Great Britain with war materials. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the public wanted no more political arguing, and leaders of the republican and democratic parties decided they needed to work together to win the war. There is some speculation that if Roosevelt had been free to pursue his real interventionist agenda, the U.S. might have entered the war

Open Document