The Myth Of Criminal Behavior

698 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nature vs nurture debate answered

In this Paper, I will be exploring the myth that criminal behavior is caused by the environment in which a person grows up in. This paper will basically discuss the long-time argument of nature vs nurture. The nature theorists believe that criminal behavior is biological and inherited in genetics, while the nurture theorists believe that everyone is born the same way and the way they are raised plus the environment around them influence criminal behavior. This is relevant because it’s a very big topic not only in criminal justice, but also in psychology as it involves the way people interact within society and the development of criminal behavior. I also have always been intrigued with the nature vs nurture debate and would like to know more …show more content…

One major piece of evidence that supports the nature view is sex chromosomal diseases. It is believed that the XXY syndrome and criminality share a correlation due to the reasoning that the extra male chromosome induces higher levels of testosterone which leads to higher aggression (Justification of Criminal Behavior). The reason this was researched was because of a case in 1996 when a man was convicted of the murder and rape of eight students. He argued that he was suffering from XXY syndrome but it later was discovered he had a normal genotype (Justification of Criminal Behavior). Another piece of evidence is the insanity defense. A person accused of a crime can acknowledge that they committed the crime, but argue that they are not responsible for it because of their mental illness, by pleading "not guilty by reason of insanity." (Francone, E.) This directly supports the nature perspective since people are born with mental illness or have the genes to cause a mental illness later in …show more content…

The family and home life can influence the way a child develops and if the child is not given the correct punishments, then the child could start to develop criminal behavior. The research conducted against the myth(nature) shows that sometimes people are just born with more aggression and cannot control their aggressive behavior. People may also be born with a mental illness that effects the way the reason which could possibly be a cause of why they committed criminal acts.
This paper has changed my views because of the research that was conducted. I was very heavy on the nurture side of the argument but after I looked at both sides, I see that sometimes people are born with more aggressiveness and/or mental illnesses that they cannot control. This does have an impact on me because I have always been interested in the nature vs nurture debate, and this paper better helped me understand both sides.
Conclusion
After the research conducted for both sides of the myth, I conclude that the myth is plausible. I believe criminal behavior is caused by both nature and nurture, and it is not always 100% accurate. Someone could have been raised in a terrible family and a bad neighborhood and still succeed in life. The same goes for the nature view as mental illnesses rarely lead to criminal

Show More
Related

  • Why Blameworthiness Is The Wrong Question Summary

    563 Words  | 2 Pages

    In my opinion, the author defends a good but also complex perspective. '' The criminal activity itself should be taken as evidence of brain abnormality'', says Eagleman, however, what about the percentage of criminals that are not carriers of the genes that contribute to performing violent crimes? Are they going to be sent to rehabilitation too and exonerated from incarceration even when there is proof of no brain

    Read More

  • Nature versus Nurture: Criminal Behavior

    2165 Words  | 5 Pages

    Finding strong evidence surrounding this topic could be significant to reducing crime rates and addressing the public health issue. What I have learn from research-based evidence and analyzing social and cultural theories, is that criminal behavior is multifaceted and is influenced by a range of determinants in which surrounds the nature versus nurture debate. I believe that nature and nurture both play significant roles to the making of a criminal.

    Read More

  • Nature vs Nurture: Genetics vs Environment

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    The issue of whether or not criminal or aggressive behavior and violence is caused by biological or environmental factors has proven to be one that has caused a dispute for many years now. The biological or genetic factor of violent/criminal or aggressive behavior is certainly a much talked about topic. The idea that certain individuals could be predisposed to violence is something definitely deserving of doing research about. The nature vs. nurture topic has been a continuing debate for many aspects of human behavior, including aggression/violent behavior and criminal behavior. There have been many studies indicating that chemical relationships between hormones and the frontal lobe of the brain may play a key role in determining aggressive behavior as well as genetics, while other studies have explored environmental and social factors that have been said to control patterns in human aggression. Aggressive/violent behavior can’t be answered directly if it is caused by either nature or nurture; instead it is believed that both cause it.

    Read More

  • Edwin Sutherland's Differential Association Theory Of Criminal Behavior

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    First and foremost, the theory states that criminal behavior is learned, meaning that the behaviors of an individual are influenced and shaped by those they associate with (Clinard & Meier, 2015). The primary reference point here is the nuclear family. Parents teach their children how to walk and talk, who grow up with siblings or in some cases, elderly relatives. With good reason, it is widely held that these interactions create the foundation of the individual’s conception of societal norms and values. That being said, if the individual is capable of assessing proper behavior in society, they are also capable of learning what is considered

    Read More

  • Nature vs Nurture: Genetics vs Environment

    974 Words  | 2 Pages

    The classic debated topic of Nature versus Nurture has been and will always be a quarrelsome subject in the scientific world. Meaning, the issue of the level to which environment and heredity sway behavior and development in a person. Nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. This means the behaviors is based on the inherited makeup of an individual and is an influence of the growth and development of that individuals’ all through life. On the other hand nurture is causes of behaviors that are environmental. This Intel’s the influence is from the individual’s parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences that individual exposed to during life. However, these concept of ideas supports the inborn genetic framework, inherited from our parents, is the sole influential factor in our behavioral characteristics. These two conflicting viewpoints have created a whole host of thoughts, assumptions, and opinion in psychology. For the reason, the distinction between nature and nurture are not enough to put one overlapping the other.

    Read More

  • Is Criminal Behavior Determined Biologically?

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.

    Read More

  • 40's 40 Studies That Changed Psychology

    974 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nature vs. nurture has been one of psychology’s biggest debates for decades, maybe centuries. Many studies have shown that nature rules seventy percent of our behavior but people hate that idea, especially parents.

    Read More

  • Which Trait Theory Most Explains Criminal Behavior

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    Criminal behavior can mostly be explained by the Biosocial Branch of Trait Theory. Individual traits by themselves cannot determine criminality. Outside factors such as the environment along with certain personality traits is what causes criminal behavior.

    Read More

  • Genetic Factors and Criminal Behavior

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    They also explore the myths about the connection between genetic factors and criminal behavior. The first myth they looked at was “Identifying the Role of Genetics in Criminal Behavior Implies That There Is a “Crime Gene.”” This myth is dismissed because of the unlikelihood that that a single gene is responsible for criminal behavior. The second myth they look at is “Attributing Crime to Genetic Factors is Deterministic.” This myth is also easily dismissed because of the fact that just because someone has a predisposition to a certain behavior doesn’t mean that the person will take on that behavior.

    Read More

  • Is Criminal Behaviour Inherited or Learned?

    1438 Words  | 3 Pages

    Criminologists and sociologist have long been in debate for century's to explain criminal behaviour. The two main paradigms of thought are between 'nature' and 'nurture'. Nature is in reference to a learnt behaviour where a multitude of characteristics, in society influence whether a person becomes deviant such as poverty, physical abuse or neglect. Nurture defines biological features which could inevitability lead to a individuals deviant or criminal behaviour, because criminality is believed by biological positivist to be inherited from a persons parents. However, I believe that criminal behaviour is a mixture of characteristics that lead to deviant acts such as psychological illness & Environmental factors. Therefore, this essay will aim to analyse both biological positivist and psychological positivist perspectives in hope of showing to what extent they play a role in criminal behaviour. Firstly, the essay will look at Cesare Lombroso's research on physical features and how these ideas have moved on to then develop scientific ideas such as genetics to explain criminal behaviour. Secondly, the essay will focus on external factors which may be able to explain criminal behaviour such as the social influences, life chances and Material deprivation.

    Read More

  • The Development of a Criminal Mind

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is a fact that criminals have a smaller brains than law abiding citizens. Often, offenders share particular physical traits such as, being young males, muscular, having lower than average IQ, and a impulsive personality. Serial offenders are usually hyperactive and difficult children If a person has a low IQ, it is proven to be directly related to their tendency to be commit impulse actions that provide an immediate payoff. For instance, a rape or a mugging would provide a criminal with an immediate payoff. It is proven that crime often runs in families. In fact, chronic criminals are proven to be three times more likely to have criminal children. However, despite this information, scientists have no basis to come to any conclusions with this data. Therefore, one must consider other possible factors that may create a criminal mind, to come to a reasonable decision as to how one is developed.

    Read More

  • Are Criminals Born or Made?

    2147 Words  | 5 Pages

    These theories represent part of the classic psychological debate, nature versus nurture. Are individuals predisposed to becoming a criminal or are they made through their environment. There are various theories within the biological explanation as to why individuals commit criminal behaviour, these include: genetic theory, hereditary theory, psychosis and brain injury theory. In the next few paragraphs examples of each will be shown. The first theory to be explored is the hereditary theory, which stems from Cesare Lombroso (1876) father of criminology, (Feldman, 1993) whose studies were carried out by morphology.

    Read More

  • Child Development: Heredity and Environment

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    The distinction between nature versus nurture or even environment versus heredity leads to the question of: does the direct environment or the nature surrounding an adolescent directly influence acts of delinquency, later progressing further into more radical crimes such as murder or psychotic manifestation, or is it directly linked to the hereditary traits and genes passed down from that individual adolescent’s biological parents? To answer this question one must first understand the difference between nature, nurture, environment, and heredity. Nurture, broken down further into environment, is defined as various external or environmental factors one is exposed to which can be more specifically broken down into social and physical aspects. Nature, itself broken down into heredity, is defined as the genetics and the individual characteristics in one’s personality or even human nature.

    Read More

  • The Causes of Criminal Behavior

    776 Words  | 2 Pages

    Criminality constitutes strategic mannerisms characterized by apathy to misery inflicted on others, egocentricity and depressed self-control. Habitual criminal behaviour seeks to satisfy the offender’s desires for material prestige, power or pleasurable feelings regardless to damage inflicted to victim or society. Such behaviors extend mistrust, fuel prejudice, and largely corrupt social cohesion. Biological, psychological and environmental attributes are thought to heavily influence antisocial and criminal behaviour. Numerous studies have proven that active emulation, genetic predispositions and psychosocial labeling are all complementary to development and expressions of criminal behaviour. There has historically been a myriad of theories that attempt to explain criminal behaviour through different perspectives, all which constitute intricate paradigms that play a role in expressio...

    Read More

  • Biology Is Destiny Essay

    1629 Words  | 4 Pages

    Inclusion, biology has provide an outstanding amount of work to show that there is a connection between criminality and the brain which can be tracked back before birth. Nonetheless, there are also explanations provided by environmental causes in criminality, although there is no clear evident like that of biology which shows how environment influences criminality. Furthermore, with evidence suggesting that criminality is in fact a cause of genetics and environment interacting together. As such I am more open to this idea of the two being the products of criminality, however I with no doubt is still more environmental pro as it offers more freedom than biological fixation.

    Read More

More about The Myth Of Criminal Behavior

Open Document