The Development of a Criminal Mind

There needs to be an external cause to trigger the characteristic. Many criminologists are stuck on developing biological explanations to the make-up of criminals. These theories are often called "bad seed" theories. They hold that criminals are born and not developed. The most recently discovered "bad seed" theory is that some men are born with an extra Y chromesone that makes them more aggressive (Adams 157).

Though inconclusive, there are numerous other socio-biological factors that present individual risks to criminality. These include gang related peer influence, low IQ levels and hormones; especially cortisol and testosterone. Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society.

There are many reasons that a person commits a crime. There are multiple schools of thought when it comes to crime and the offender. Are they born predisposed to commit crime or are they taught the behaviors required to break the law? Of these many aspects we often ignore the possibility that genetics and our biological make up may be in part to blame for a person’s decision to violate the law. When a police detective begins to investigate a crime they must try to determine why the crime was committed, which will in turn help them develop a potential suspect.

So with all of this in mind “Do illegal drugs influence an individual to commit heinous crimes, such as murder?” It is interesting to see what the literature says on this topic and how there are actu... ... middle of paper ... ...much and they are not aware of what they are doing, and make poor decisions. So, the level of self control individuals can dictate their criminal behavior. connection The current knowledge about criminal behavior in relation to drugs is limited. People can say that the drugs are likely to influence criminal activity, but that doesn't give anything specific information about how criminal activity is influenced by drugs. It is one thing to make inferences about what is seen in a few people and another to actually have a group of people observed who can represent this behavior may times.

1.0 Introduction Crime depicts any act or omission that is prohibited by the public law. On the same note, behavior is a function which has measurable differences in psychological characteristics among individuals (Brennan-Galvin, 2002). Such characteristics may be influenced by constitutional, personality attributes, and neurophysiologic or genetics factors. Likewise, criminal behavior is the commission of acts which in their situational and social settings are considered crimes due to the fact that they violate existing norms and codes of conduct regardless of whether the perpetrator is arrested, and if tried, convicted or acquitted. The origin of criminal behavior is complex since it involves long term interaction of the psychological and biological characteristics, economic as well as social and cultural environments in which different individuals were born, raised and lived (Cassel & Bernstein, 2007).

They hypothesized that other factors in performance or alone with environmental variables would lead to better understanding of why some people become criminal. The genetic factor of influence due to mental disorders was posed to have a slight role in affecting people to show criminal behavior. Another cause looked at was the combination of genetic and environmental factors, with a possible result of having a higher risk for criminal behavior. They also explore the myths about the connection between genetic factors and criminal behavior. The first myth they looked at was “Identifying the Role of Genetics in Criminal Behavior Implies That There Is a “Crime Gene.”” This myth is dismissed because of the unlikelihood that that a single gene is responsible for criminal behavior.

These differences are more than mere coincidence, they are evidence that killers do not think in the same way. The killers’ drives and motives are irregular, just as their brains are. Not only are these variations interesting, but they are also crucial to the justice system in regards to the punishment of past, future, and present sequential murderers. It is important that as a society we learn the differences in the mind of a killer, and also recognize and understand them. A serial killer’s brain greatly differs in function from the average citizen’s brain due to physical variations in the brain and a different chemical makeup.

However, this is based on individual opinion that may not be accurate in describing all juveniles within the justice system. Meaning that juveniles may be more problematic in the inner city due to higher police presence in comparison to individual who live in the suburbs or country. Nonetheless, despite the location of the delinquent, if one comes into contact with law enforcement either through being caught/reported for petty thievery or for more violent offenses such as murder, they will have will eventually be subjected to judicial

Murder Versus Mindset Criminal violations are a major issue in today 's society; obviously there will be wrongdoings whether one wants to believe it or not. In any case, does that imply that individuals are all bound to perpetrate wrongdoings in the event that they are related to a criminal, in someway? Although there continues to be a multitude of beings that believe crime is biologically determined, no human 's are exactly alike in decisions; Hence criminal behaviors are not biologically determined. By recognizing that human behavior is influenced by many factors, by refuting counterarguments that the so-called root of the crime is the biological mindset as a child one will discover this theory will inevitably fall short. By presenting sound arguments, one will be persuaded to reconsider that biology is not the strongest factor of criminology.

It baffles me that physical features were ever considered a reliable explanation to criminal behavior. To compare one’s features to criminal behavior is not only stereotypical, but also highly unreliable. There are more contemporary biological theories that have since developed. However, most are still nearly impossible to prove true; for example, the genetic theory of crime in fraternal and identical twins. This study is supposed to provide evidence that those who are born with the same genetically heritable trait are more prone to crime than fraternal twins or siblings because of the ... ... middle of paper ... ...dual will engage in criminal behaviors…biological factors are said to increase the likelihood that an individual will engage in criminal behaviors when these factors interact with physiological or social factors.” (Bernard, Snipes, Gerould, p. 55) In contrast, Emile Durkheim argued that crime is a functional part of society; each society has its own rates and types of crimes.