The Joker Analysis

1867 Words4 Pages

The Joker has been represented in two films in the last 30 years, Batman (1989) played by Jack Nicholson and The Dark Knight (2008) played by Heath Ledger. Batman’s director Tim Burton gave Nicholson’s Joker an identity outside the Joker persona: an identity that effects his motivations and the overall tone of the film as being filled with revenge. In contrast, The Dark Knight’s director Christopher Nolan focuses on the mental connection between Ledger’s Joker and Batman (Christian Bale) through juxtaposing Joker’s anarchy to Batman’s morality. The motivations behind each portrayal are reflected in the way their respective personas were created. Nicholson’s motivation is all about revenge against Batman (Michael Keaton), Grissom (Jack Palance), …show more content…

His mental connection with Batman comes out in full force in the interrogation scene with Batman after the before mentioned kidnapping, a point Rodriguez mentions in his article “The interrogation scene with Batman exemplifies this point, when the Joker responds to Batman's claim that he is "garbage who kills for money" by saying "you're just a freak like me!" (Physiognomy and Freakery: The Joker On Film). Ledger’s Joker looks at Batman as just like him and he later destroys the insult that Batman throws at him in this scene, when he burns his half of the mob money. This is a major difference between the two portrayals of Joker as Nicholson’s version is trying to kill Batman instead of worrying about some moral code. This difference is a consequence of Nicholson’s character having the identity of Jack Napier, that he has connection outside the villain-superhero feud between the two: a connection exists to the man inside of Batman, Bruce Wayne. Therefore, Batman becomes a revenge film from both sides as Batman is looking to avenge his parent’s death at the hands of Jack Napier/Joker while Joker is on a quest to kill Batman to repay him for his role in making him the …show more content…

However, in The Dark Knight the audience didn’t need a death for closure as the film was a physiological thriller about a clash between the morals of Batman and the antithesis of those morals in the chaos of Ledger’s Joker. Nolan chooses to have the fight for Gotham’s soul to decide the winner and not have a fight to the death. Batman’s refusal to give into the corruption Ledger’s Joker is constantly forcing on his psyche is described in detail in Vilja Johnson’s article “'It's What You Do that Defines You:' Christopher Nolan's Batman as Moral Philosopher”. Johnson focuses on their last encounter in The Dark Knight to demonstrate this “When Batman pushes the Joker off of himself and over the building's edge, he could justify the death as self-defense, and yet he chooses to save the falling villain at the last moment” ('It's What You Do that Defines You:' Christopher Nolan's Batman as Moral Philosopher”). Nolan’s decision to keep the connection between Ledger’s version and Batman mental made this a possible outcome for film in a way Burton’s Batman didn’t. Nicholson’s Joker had no choice but to die to allow Keaton’s Batman to have a closure in his parent’s death that Bale’s Batman gained in Nolan’s first film Batman Begins with Joe Chill’s

Open Document