The Importance of the Biology/Society Dualism to the Gendered Body

2248 Words5 Pages

The Importance of the Biology/Society Dualism to the Gendered Body

The body has played an important part in sociology to explain the

differences between the two sexes, and why these differences exist. A

lot of social debate is about the relationship between the biological

and the social. At one end of the debate there are those who see

activities such as sexual behaviour entirely based on biology, they

are called biological determinists who argue that there is biological

bases for child rearing and different sexual orientations and also

refer to pre- programmed behaviour. At the other end of the scale are

those who see sexual and other kinds of behaviour as entirely social

constructed, they see that people learn their behaviour through their

culture. Both approaches identify and stress the importance of their

view, this will be discussed further, and it will identify why both

aspects are important when trying to understand the gendered body

In gender, reproductive differences between males and females are

assumed to directly reflect a whole range of others differences

between the two sexes. As women have two X chromosomes, and men have

one X and one Y chromosome (Connell: 2002:28) These genetic

differences according to some sociologists and scientists affect the

ways in which women and men can behave and have an affect as to what

is capable of them, and the difference in genes between the two sexes

explain the gendered body. For examples bodily strength and physical

skills are different amongst the sexes. These viewpoints are adopted

by naturalists, they see the body shaped entirely by the power of

biology, and the biology of a pe...

... middle of paper ...

...
70-88.

Mauss, M. (1979) Sociology and Psychology, London: Routledge and Kegan

Paul

Murdock, G. P. (1965) Social Structure. London: Free Press; Collier-

MacMillan.

Oakley,A. (1972) Sex, Gender and Society: towards a new society.

London: Temple Smith

Radley, A. (1995) The Elusory Body and Social Constructionist Theory.

Body and Society, 1(2), 3-23.

Riley,N. (1997) Gender, Power, and Population Change. [online]

Available from:

http://www.prb.org/Content/NavigationMenu/PRB/AboutPRB/Population_Bulletin2/

[Accessed on 20th Nov 04]

Sawicki, J. (1991) Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power and the Body.

London: Routledge.

Shilling, C (2003) The Body and Social Theory. Second Edition. London:

SAGE Publications Ltd.

Turner, B. (1984)The Body ad Society. Oxford: Blackwells Publisher Ltd

Open Document