Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gay and lesbian discrimination
The role of family in society
Discrimination about homosexuality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gay and lesbian discrimination
The definition of marriage set by the ‘Hyde V Hyde and Woodmansee case’ has increasingly become challenged due to the changing values of society a different family arrangements. Same-sex couples are not entitled to the same rights and responsibilities as heterosexual couples under the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth). Same-sex marriage is perceived as void in Australia under the Marriage Amendment Act which clearly states that marriage is ‘the union of a man and a woman’. Therefore, despite laws such as the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) which aim to protect discrimination against marital status, homosexual couples do not receive such protection as their legal marital status remains ‘single’.
In an attempt to reflect the dynamic nature of society’s social values, numerous law reforms had been introduced across Australian states and territories to recognise same-sex relationships. In 2008, acting in accordance to the Australian Human Rights Commission Report Same-sex: Same entitlements, the government introduced law reforms with the intention of freeing homosexual couples from discrimina...
Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by
Despite the leap in time, humanity has advanced no further in its acceptance and tolerance of those who are different. Discrimination has always been present throughout past societies and will more than likely persist in future generations. It is Australia’s most detrimental and prevailing issue, with victims ostracized, bullied and even suffering physical abuse. In our society today, homosexuals in particular are still falling victim to unjust oppressive societal attitudes. But why? They are still human, are they not?
The gay rights movement has made great progress in the United States, compared to generations ago, with the legalization of marriage in some states, and also the gaining of certain equal rights. Many people today accept homosexuals within society, and society in general is more...
Same-sex relationships have always been a controversial legal issue, and there has been a variety of legal and non-legal responses, coming from a range of different viewpoints regarding the issue. In recent years, there has been many law reforms recognising same sex relationships, which include changes to Medicare, tax, social security, superannuation, worker’s compensation, child support, and allowing people in same-sex relationships to adopt children. These legal reforms come about as a result of extensive lobbying by non-government groups and organisations designed to promote the recognition of same-sex relationships in Australia.
Since the 1960’s, same sex relationships have created controversy throughout the United States on whether The LGBT community should be treated any differently from the nuclear couple. However, Cockburn quickly implies the views of Peter Tatchell, the British gay leader and how he believes that marriage forces “‘[Gay men to] conform [and] albeit equality with [society’s’] screwed-up system. That is not liberation. It is capitulation’” (1). Those couples who agree to gay marriage are risking their opportunities to expand themselves in social or cultural ways as they please. Marriage tries to mold a generation of couples that have worked in the past leaving no room for uniqueness. Gay couples are now conforming to society’s orders just to survive and to achieve their aspirations of perhaps having the option to legally own their home one day, having kids, or opening up their own business. Marriage has been the only way the government has approved to helping gay couples achieve their goals and it has also fabricated the idea that it leads to the pursuit of happiness when in reality it is controlling in what ways couples can obtain this feeling of achievement. Society has not only used marriage, but has also manipulated school districts to restrict students from
In today’s society, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) community has been more accepted then in years prior, especially in the 1960’s and years prior to that, when anyone in the LGBT community would be horribly ridiculed, if not tortured. However, there still lies a long road for the LGBT community, as it pertains to human rights, equality, and particularly, marriage equality. Each individual has their own perception on marriage equality, whether it is based on moral basis, or on a humanistic (humane) basis, which is the belief of not denying anyone the right to be who they are, and therefore love who they love. However, as a society, we must examine the facts, as well as ourselves, as we address the debate for marriage equality for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community.
Family law is the body of law pertaining to marriage and matrimonial issues. Its main aim is to protect each member of a family, whether that family is nuclear, de-facto, single parent, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander or blended in nature, as family is the foundation of society.It can be said that as community standards and expectations change and evolve in regards to the changing nature of parental responsibility, care and protection of children, the recognition of same-sex relationships and surrogacy and birth technologies the law has been reformed to reflect these emerging values and thus improve the rights of parents and children. Although this argument is not true in all circumstances, it is a prominent issue which legislators face,
The Marriage Act 1961 is a law made by the Australian Parliament that sets out the strict legal requirements and rules for a valid marriage. Prior to 2004 there was no formal definition of marriage in the Marriage Act 1961 however the Act was amended in 2004 to formally define marriage as ‘the union of a man and woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.’ There are three legal requirements that stem from this definition. The first is that a marriage must be heterosexual, that is, it must be between a man and woman. Same-sex couples may participate in a commitment ceremony or same-sex couples may also get married overseas if the marriage meets the legal requirements of that country however these marriages are not recognised by Australian law. The second legal requirement that stems from the definition of marriage is that a marriage must be monogamous meaning a
Heteronormativity is the representation and perpetuation of heterosexuality as being the only ‘normal’ and ‘natural’ form of sexual expression (robinson). In Australia this was the dominant mode of thinking up until recent times and, this had a profound affect on how the Australian family was structured. The nuclear family, as an ideal model had the representation of heterosexual marriage as the backbone of the true and affective family (changing face). Over recent years the stigma surrounding homosexuality has been lifted through a process of insight and interaction and, has seen the various forms of sexual expression be, on the whole accepted as just as valid as heterosexuality. This social progression has been reflected in Australian families and their structures.
In our group there is a consensusthat homosexuals should have complete equality with everyone else in this country to not only marryand engage in sexual activities, but also to raise children. This is the result of the factthat in the recent past homosexuals, as well as women, have challenged these restrictions in the courts as well as in the media. Their actions have had a tremendous effect not only on our group butalso on a vast amount of people in this country. Just twenty yearsago there would have been a much greater opposition to equality for homosexuals. Butas a result of their involvement, public awareness has been raised. This paper aims to deal with specific constitutional arguments, a number of court cases, the opinions of a few Hunter College students we talkedto, and the role that homosexuals play in the media.
Society is created with both homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Previously when certain laws discriminated against others, such as law for women's rights to vote, these laws were changed. Changing the traditions of the country does not mean that it will lead to the legalization of other extreme issues. Each ...
As of 2015, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community continues to struggle for equal rights held by their straight counterparts. Socially, LGBT persons are subject to discrimination, hate crimes, and stigma, while legally, LGBT persons encounter obstacles that preclude them from basic rights afforded to every other subculture in America. One of the most divisive issues related to LGBT rights has been same-sex marriage, which has been creating conflict both politically and socially dating back to the 1970’s (Finnis, 1997). Those in favor of same-sex marriage argue that regardless of gender or sexual preference, marriage is a basic right that the government has no legitimate interest in blocking. Opponents argue that same-sex marriage is ethically and morally wrong, and they cite reasons spanning from religious beliefs to the creation of a slippery slope that would lead to the demise of the institution of marriage (Volokh, n.d.). Faced with the difficult task of balancing both sides of the equation, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the policy that will be analyzed in this paper.
In addition to this, we are now more accepting of the same sex relationships as a result of the recent introduction and legalisation of the same sex marriages. However, there ...
The legalization of same-sex marriage in Australia is a highly controversial matter, but it shouldn’t have to be this way. I believe that it is time that Australia follows in the footsteps of countries such as America, Ireland and all other countries who have accepted this normal concept of marriage. Allowing same-sex couples with the right to marry will in no way infringe upon the rights of others. Not allowing same-sex marriage puts a message across that discrimination against sexual orientation is socially acceptable, when it is not.
... the past several years is the same-sex family. Since the sexual revolution of the 1960’s, changing attitudes have brought more tolerance to the gay and lesbian community. This has somewhat loosened the stigma previously associated with this segment of the population. Along with evolving public attitudes, economic and legal changes in the United States have also reduced barriers previously facing same-sex couples making it more likely for them to form families (Butler, 2004). On the other hand, continued strong institutional ties to marriage between one man and one woman continue to pose problem for this group and shape social agendas (Glenn, 2004; Lind, 2004). While several states and many employers have given recognition and benefits to homosexual partners, there is still no uniform policy in place which addresses their familial rights in the United States.