Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical philosophy on immigration
Ethical issues in immigration policy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical philosophy on immigration
Towards the asylum seekers who are illegally crossing the border into Canada due to fear from recent changes to the US immigration policy, Canada should lift the Safe Third World Agreement with the US and lift the cap on the number of privately sponsored refugees allowed in. Doing so would eliminate the need for illegal crossings because the Agreement prevents these asylum seekers from requesting refugee status at official borders and would allow for more people to seek refuge in Canada. Canada is morally obligated to do so based on Peter Singer’s theory on our duty to provide aid and on Thomas Pogge’s causation and responsibility model. There are increasing amounts of people coming from the US hoping to get a refugee status granted to them …show more content…
As Singer says, "if we can help without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, then we ought to help” (1972); therefore, it is quite evident that we are in the position to help, as letting in more refugees will not lead to us sacrificing anything comparable to what the refugees are facing. Overall, Canada as a country is quite wealthy and is capable of supporting more people. Although we may be at different levels of wealth, overall, we are quite privileged. We also have an obligation to refugees because these people are not normal immigrants. These people are seeking a safe place to settle, as they have no other choice but to turn to other countries for protection. If they had the choice, they would not want to leave, whereas, normal immigrants are coming into Canada voluntarily (Parekh, S., …show more content…
The US is no longer following this obligation and therefore, should no longer be deemed as a safe place for refugees. What does this mean for Canada? We have a moral obligation to provide a safe place to refugees, especially because we are within reach, and are capable. There are innocent people in grave danger; if we can help, then we should (Singer, 1972). By fleeing their own country, refugees are essentially petitioning other states to address their right to protection (Blake, M., 2016). “Even if integration is a difficult process, that process seems morally obligatory, [especially] when the alternative is the literal destruction of human lives” (Blake, M., 2016). It is evident that the US is no longer fit to decide what is safeguarding them and what poses a threat to them, as it seems that they are unable realize they are the source of the threats posed towards these refugees who initially went to them looking for safety and are asking for
...a’s immigration policy becoming fairer. From 1991-1997, 607 Rwandan refugees were allowed into Canada. From 1992-1997, close to 13,000 thousand Bosnian refugees were allowed into Canada. The acceptance of these refugees from Bosnia and Rwanda show how much Canada’s immigration policy has changed since 1914, when many immigrants and refugees trying to enter Canada were rejected.
Stakeholders: Three of the most affected stakeholders in this situation are the Syrian refugees, Canadian citizens and the Canadian government. The Syrian refugees need a place to go as they are fleeing from their dangerous country. The Canadian citizens also are important stakeholders because they are the ones that are paying for the government funding and also they are the ones who will be feeling the effects of Syrian refugees in Canada. The Canadian government is also a stakeholder in the arrival of Syrian refugees because they are hoping to increase the population to increase the amount
UNHCR (2010), ‘Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries 2009: Statistical Overview of Asylum Applications Lodged in Europe and Selected Non-European Countries’, Geneva, UNHCR.
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
On April 10th of 1978, the Immigration Act was passed by Pierre Trudeau of the Liberal Government of Canada. This piece of legislation had three main objectives. It promoted the reunification of families that had been separated by immigration, accepted persecuted people for humanitarian value to the nation, and strengthened a currently strong and viable economy in Canada. The Immigration Act of 1978 outlined three distinguishable classes of immigrants: Independent, Family, and Refugee. In order to be accepted, the Independent Class had to satisfy a new Point System, which enabled immigrants to score marks from each category: Education, Skill, Language, and Resources. The Family Class was mainly for immigrants with close relatives who were already living in Canada as a citizen or as a permanent resident. This unprecedented act primarily allowed a humanitarian category for refugees. The Immigration Act of 1978 impacted Canada as it permitted the nations to strengthen its economy and population, provided ethnic composition of population, and fulfilled Canada’s obligation to refugees.
This article pertains to the contentious issue of illegal immigration. Following the election of President Donald Trump in the United States, amnesty policies and laws have become obsolete. Furthermore, President Trump has promised to enforce immigration law and deport illegal and criminal aliens from the United States. Canada has seen a huge influx of economic migrants who illegal enter Canada, many of these are crossing from Minnesota into Manitoba, their failure to cross from a port of entry constitutes an illegal border crossing. Recently, there has been a movement among ‘bleeding heart’ politicians to declare cities as ‘Sanctuary Cities’. A Sanctuary City is one which provides safe haven for illegal immigrants and protects them from
Immigration is of great economic and social benefit to Canada. It’s an important role in developing our economy, and it shapes the nation into a multicultural nation. Immigration is a significant role in building our economy, providing growth in the labor force, making a strong economy, and becoming a multicultural nation.
Canada has continuously served as a home to immigrants and refugees from decade to decade harbouring people from a variety of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. The first set of immigrants to settle in the country came from Britain, the United States and from other nationalities mostly including immigrants from Europe who were either desperate to escape from religious or political turmoil or were simply attracted to Canada’s economic promise. Soon after the Canadian confederation in 1867, immigrants from Irish and Chinese backgrounds who occupied most of the country were used as workers and the demand for labourers to develop the country increased rapidly as more Chinese descents were imported to build the Canadian Pacific Railway. Although, Canada opened its doors to immigrants, but the country also intended to gain human resources for work in the farms, in the forests, factories and mines but not everyone was equally welcomed in Canada.
Currently, best estimates are that over one-half of the world's refugee population, or over 20 million, are children.1 Human Rights Watch, a watchdog non-governmental organization, estimated that in 1990 over 8,500 children, 70 percent of whom were unaccompanied, reached United States shores.2 While this figure is small relative to the total world estimate of child refugees, the lack of systemic or comprehensive United States governmental policies specifically geared toward assessing the asylum claims of children and their circumstances has become increasingly problematic. Continued human rights violations in China, worldwide genocide - as seen in Bosnia in the early 1990s and currently in Kosovo - and persistent civil wars in Sri Lanka and parts of Africa, have resulted in an increase of t...
This has led organisations such as Refugee councils and Refugee Action
Canada is perceived by other nations as a peace-loving and good-natured nation that values the rights of the individual above all else. This commonly held belief is a perception that has only come around as of late, and upon digging through Canadian history it quickly becomes obvious that this is not the truth. Canadian history is polluted with numerous events upon which the idea that Canada is a role model for Human Rights shows to be false. An extreme example of this disregard for Human Rights takes place at the beginning of the twentieth-century, which is the excessive prejudice and preconceived notions that were held as truths against immigrants attempting to enter Canada. Another prime example of these prejudices and improper Human Rights is the Internment of those of Japanese descent or origin during the Second World War. Also the White Paper that was published by the government continues the theme of Human Rights being violated to the utmost extreme. All these events, as well as many others in history, give foundation to the idea that “Canada as a champion for Human Rights is a myth”.
Lewis, S. (11 December, 2013). Without a Safety Net: What kind of country do Canadians
Migration has been a major part of human living and also animals, people migrate for various reasons such as seeking better lives, family, job opportunity, availability of social amenities etc. immigration policies were put in place to monitor and decide who immigrate to a country and these policies have been present since 1906, and these polices have had different reasons for their enactment and these reasons change as time and era changes (Baglay, 2014). The early policies were racially based restriction, economic growth, multiculturalism, restriction on refugee and economic immigration (Baglay, 2014). The Communitarian approach used by Michael Walzer to explain immigration policy is similar to Canadian immigration policy. This paper seeks to discuss and analyze the articles by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer, explaining the different perspectives of explaining immigration policies. The paper would summarize and contrast the author’s main arguments. It would take a stand on which argument is more persuasive in explaining immigration policy and give reason for this position. It would also use other articles to support or refute each argument made by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer. Lastly this paper would explain and come to a conclusion of if any of these arguments apply to Canadian immigration policy and give examples of these similarities. Carens and Walzer had very different view on immigration and open border, Carens used the Liberal perspective of explaining open border.
Government of Canada.( 2005, January 3). Evaluation of the immigrant settlement and adaptation program (ISAP). Retrieved from http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/evaluation/isap/cap-service.asp
A refugee is defined as an individual who has been forced to leave their country due to political or religious reasons, or due to threat of war or violence. There were 19.5 million refugees worldwide at the end of 2014, 14.4 million under the mandate of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), around 2.9 million more than in 2013. The other 5.1 million Palestinian refugees are registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). With the displacement of so many people, it is difficult to find countries willing to accept all the refugees. There are over 125 different countries that currently host refugees, and with this commitment comes the responsibility of ensuring these refugees have access to the basic requirements of life; a place to live, food to eat, and a form of employment or access to education. Currently, the largest cause of refugees is the Syrian civil war, which has displaced over 2.1 million people. As a country of relative wealth, the United States should be able to provide refuge for many refugees, as well as provide monetary support to the refugees that they are not able to receive.