Dear, beloved One’s.
First of all, we would like to start by thanking the first awaken generation with love and respect. Thank you for all the great work you did for the next seeded generation of indigo, crystal, and star-seed. Right Now one by one they are all waking up to their true selves, and walking on the path you cleared for them. However, we kindly ask from the first awaken one’s with this new amazing love energy to reconsider yourselves ones again and release all the leftover energy accumulated for years. There is no harm to check the energy balance with every fresh information. As Heraclitus said, “There is nothing permanent except change.”
Everything is a constant energy flow, therefore, we constantly flow as an energy in the life. Howbeit we still
…show more content…
We start learning fear since infancy, and we are growing up with extravagance and negativity. Once we complete the childhood, what is desired from us is killing the soul with the brain has completed its development.
What is killing the soul means and how we can kill our souls?
Killing the soul, means learning to say ‘NO’ to the body and to the mind. Conscious individuals, who have volition on the body can kill their souls. ONE must take conscious steps towards becoming of volitional individuals.
The soul is the suit we choose to wear over the spirit. Spirit is the GOD piece we carry. Everybody has a spirit, which means everybody has a GOD within them. The soul is what we think we are and the spirit is what we truly are.
The soul is the mind, emotion and will. The soul is what we call the psyche. The soul is ego, alter ego and ID. Therefore, the soul has extensions, we called them soul extensions or our/selves. The spirit is the sum of all soul extensions which is the breath of GOD, which also mean spirit is the sum of all ourselves which is the Self also known as the Divine Self which is the real YOU. Spirit is the state of full consciousness or
If there were such a drug that work to get rid of the soul it is most likely is going to get rid of the body as well. The fact that it isn’t possible does not validate Smullyan’s point (if this is an attack on dualism) but rather it shows why the point is (in my opinion) senseless in the first place. I don’t believe Smullyans is necessarily strictly arguing against dualism but he is mischaracterizing it slightly by stating that mind and matter are not just separate substances but independent substances capable of existing apart from one another without any observable
People get scared of their own thoughts and paranoia, as seen in House Taken Over. People’s imagination overpower what’s actually happening most of the time in real life. This is caused by scary movies, books, and television shows. When people don’t think before they do things because of fear, it often leads to worse situations. Therefore, I believe that our own mindset and imagination is what leads to fear and bad
When one lives in his body, he experiences fate. The spirit is forever free. When one live in the spirit, he experiences through and through freedom. “Our life as it is now is created by the results of
We live in a society where a life of another human being is losing value by the minute, murder is almost more common than marriage, and monsters no longer lurk under our beds but inside us. Even sadder, this is acceptable; this is our normal. When we are children, we have an indescribable innocence; we are invincible. As we grow up, life happens, and we go through hardships that break us. Stephen King says it best with the words “sometimes inhuman places create human monsters” (Stephen King, The Shining) It is in the battle of finding ourselves in the process of trying to pick up the broken pieces. We tend to feel our losses more intensely than our gains- the exact reason we often see the walls we build from our past and not the strength gained in our experiences that aid us in our futures. We all have both good and evil in us, and we become the one we choose to act on. The majority of us choose to represent our good side, the more socially acceptable choice, but some fall victim to their darkest self. However, in order to survive in our society, we generally act on the good in us, and in order to maintain the good, we must feed the bad sometimes. This Is why I agree with Stephen king on his view of why people like horror movies?
spirit and the capability of it reaching the "Over Soul". The "Over Soul" is the so-called state in
The soul cannot be completely defined or described, but it is the only thing we can be absolutely sure of, since all other facts are temporary. Being ourselves allows us to obtain many more answers and to understand our unconscious intentions. Humans may exceed their limited ideas by realizing that God exists and that in Him, we will find many answers if we open ourselves to Him. The soul is the creative essence, while all creation, including art which is human unity with natural things, is said to be Nature. In Nature the soul sees the picture of its own pure essence manifest, seeing beauty, truth, and justice in its laws.
An axe can chop because it has a certain organization. When we say that an axe chops because of its form or organization, however, we do not mean that this form or organization does anything over and above what the composite axe (form and matter) does. Rather, the axe can chop because it has a certain form or organization. The axe can chop because it is arranged this way. Likewise, if one was to read the claim that ‘if an axe had a soul, it would be its ability to chop’ in a certain way, he or she would be lead to think that the soul, like the axe’s ability to chop, does not explain the activities of the body by doing anything over and above what the body does. Akin to the axe organization, the soul/form of a living body is the way that this living body is organized. Moreover, just like all capacities that come from being organized in a certain way, the soul does not explain activities of organized whole by doing anything. Rather, the soul explains perception by explaining how a body, organized in a certain way, (a body that has a soul), can undergo changes that are perception. This is what someone who thinks that the soul is a functionally useful structure or arrangement would have to say about this
be killed nor can he kill, because the soul can not die nor can it be
Through the course of these last few weeks, we as a class have discussed the Soul, both in concept, and as it applies in terms of our readings of The Phaedo and as a philosophical construct. But the questions involved in that: In the ideas of good, of living a ‘good’ life and getting ‘rid of the body and of their wickedness’, as ‘there is no escape from evil’, (Phaedo, 107c), in whether or not the soul is immortal, or if our bodies themselves get in the way of some higher form of knowledge, or even of the importance of philosophy itself are rather complex, simultaneously broad and specific, and more than a little messy. While I discuss these aspects, the singular question that I feel applies to this is, in a sort of nihilistic fashion, does
The results of committing evil acts have such a powerful effect on the human mind, that it is eventually destroyed by it.
Both concepts are needed to ensure that the soul can perform its role within the human each are dependent on the other but each is a unique role within the final stage of life which is death. Death as the Phaedo claims is where the soul has two paths, it is either dissolved in the wind like smoke or is eternal and has a destination in which it heads. If the soul is divine and eternal the first of the paths then is quite simply impossible as it would negate the definition of divine and eternal. We see this referenced in (102d-103a) Nothing can become its opposite while still being itself: it either flees away or is destroyed at the approach of its opposite. (For example, “tallness” cannot become “shortness” while still being “hot”). This explains how the soul by the very act of bringing life into a body rejects death and will flee from the body once death approaches. Exploring further we see that if something ceases to be either the base or a part of it ceases then the whole ceases to be what it was at the beginning. This is true not only of opposites, but in a similar way of things that contain opposites. (For example, “fire” and “snow” are not themselves opposites, but “fire” always brings “hot” with it, and “snow” always brings “cold” with it. So “fire” will not become “cold” without ceasing to be
The argument begins by making a distinction between corruptibility and incorruptibility. This distinction made is that because the body is corruptible, and the soul is viewed as a substance that is incorruptible, an explanation is needed as to how the soul can continue
Psychologically speaking, Plato’s three elements of the soul are the reason, spirit, and desire. The soul is not to be confused with “spirituality,” as Plato uses the term “soul” to describe the thing that makes people act.
The soul can be defined as a perennial enigma that one may never understand. But many people rose to the challenge of effectively explaining just what the soul is about, along with outlining its desires. Three of these people are Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine. Even though all three had distinctive views, the similarities between their views are strikingly vivid. The soul indeed is an enigma to mankind and the only rational explanation of its being is yet to come and may never arrive.
In addition to the body (tanū), it was held that an individual consisted of a number of spiritual elements that loosely fall under the category of souls. These