As discussed previously, Kareiva and Marvier argue that focusing on human welfare does not have to sacrifice biodiversity (962-969). However, some find that the argument only holds when conservation itself is tied to a clearly outlined conservation agenda (Sanderson and Redford 389). For conservation efforts to be successful, multiple countries and agencies need to cooperate (“Lecture Week 13”). Conservationists, economists, and political strategists must find conservation issues that do not hinder efforts to alleviate issues of the human condition such as global poverty and world hunger. In actuality, biodiversity loss and poverty are linked, but conservation strategies that will reap success in integrating the two need clear conceptual frameworks (Adams et al.
However, it is helpful to look at the morality of taking care of our environment and using the resources available to us scrupulously. Philosophers Hardin and Bonevac both present plausible arguments on the population’s moral duty to environmental sustainability, though there are some obvious flaws in each. Garrett Hardin (2013) uses the argument of “the tragedy of the commons” to explain the individual’s need to further enhance his living and his own comfort and success without regard for the population as a whole. Each person freely uses resources in order to achieve individual needs or wants, not realizing or caring about the impact that his lack for a better word, “selfish,” actions will have on the whole area, or the world (Hardin, 2013). The example of the cattlemen adding more and more head to their herds without considering the consequence of overgrazing demonstrates the negative aspect of the commons in that since each herdsman as opposed to just one commonly makes the decision to add more head of cattle, the negative effect increases (Hardin, 2013).
Focused on the global environmental issues, the global warming seems to be a serious case to deal with. If the global warming ... ... middle of paper ... ...as human we need to take care of it by following all the correct measurement. Maybe, the smallest action can bring huge difference to the world and help to save the ecosystem. Any extinction species can be preserved and make a plantation to help the world green. Cut off any unnecessary activities that bring damage to the surrounding.
Caring for the environment in a sustainable way is the best option people have to continue thriving as a species. As defined by the EPA sustainability is based on a simple principle: everything that we need for our survival and well-being depends, either directly or indirectly, on our natural environment. Susta... ... middle of paper ... ...y’s to mend Earth of global warming. Global Warming will have to be fought head on and it will involve sacrificing something for the better good, everyone can contribute to global warming but it’s harder to reverse global warming, this is why everything matters. The three R rule reduce, reuse and recycle can go a long way in trying to stop global warming.
The Need for Environmental Ethics “Unless humanity is suicidal, it should want to preserve, at the minimum, the natural life-support systems and processes required to sustain its own existence” (Daily p.365). I agree with scientist Gretchen Daily that drastic action is needed now to prevent environmental disaster. Immediate action and changes in attitude are not only necessary for survival but are also morally required. In this paper, I will approach the topic of environmental ethics from several related sides. I will discuss why the environment is a morally significant concern, how an environmental ethic can be developed, and what actions such an ethic would require to maintain and protect the environment.
Eco-tourism causes damage to the environment instead of conserving it. Eco-tourism is considered by most if not all as traveling to natural areas with responsibility in mind which the environment is conserved and the well being of the local people are taken care of as well as being sustainable on an ecological scale with a sole purpose of experiencing natural areas that builds environmental and cultural understanding, positive reception and upkeep (Brown 2011). However, tourism in natural areas cannot be considered and be defined as sustainable ecotourism unless it possesses the basic qualities. First of all, a sustainable ecotourism area must be able create thoughtful and attentiveness towards local environments and cultures. Conservation initiatives must be supported financially as well as empowerment and contribution of locals as a concerted project (Davis 2007).
Protecting the environment is an absolutely necessary aspect, but not sufficient, for there may be a healthy and clean natural environment where people could live in poorness or not at all. And ecological ethics can be centered on certain disadvantaged or endangered species or on threatened natural area, whilst the sustainable development ethics refers firstly to people. Though initially sustainable development was confused mostly to environmental protection against industrial pollution, the concept embraced very quickly new aspects with respect to social ethics. Sustainable development has a social solidarity dimension – it has raised the issue that the
The second demand is for sustainability, for ensuring that we do not risk the future in the sake of gains in the present. This arises from the interests of people in the future who will need access to a reasonable quality of life, non-renewable resources, unspoiled wilderness, and a healthy biosphere. These two moral demands do conflict. In fact, economic growth is the prime source of threats to the natural environment. We have a rough sense of what a good quality of life for humans consists of.
If everyone would simply try to take the smallest measures to preserve and protect our environment I believe it will result in large results. References: Joseph R. Des Jardins, Wadsworth / Thomson Learning. Environmental Ethics 2001.
It is crucial to comprehend that the environment must not be customized for us; rather we should acclimatize to it. Environmentalism provides this opportunity whereby we improve and r... ... middle of paper ... ...t to achieve them. Ross Perot quoted “The activist is not the man who says the river is dirty. The activist is the man who cleans up the river”. His statement is very true as we rely heavily on other individuals to designate tasks to us or for them to do what it themselves instead of us taking lead and doing it.