The Doctrine Of Fascism: A Comparative Analysis

565 Words2 Pages

In the book written by Adolf Hitler, while he was in prison, Mein Kampf, Hitler states that the Aryan race is the dominate race. While Benito Mussolini’s book The Doctrine of Fascism, shows the views of man in a fascist state. While both the essay by Mussolini and the book by Hitler both show what a person should be like in their country either it is their religion, race or political ideas. Only one shows a more convincing philosophies, because it clearly states what the person wants to get across the world.
In the book written by Adolf Hitler, a Nazi Fascist. He clearly points out the reasons that the Aryan race should be the culture that is the strongest in the world. He states, “The Aryan races-often in absurdly small number-overthrow alien nations, and favoured by …show more content…

Whether, it is that a man should appear as not as an individual, why he rejects pacifism and marxism. I can only point out one small paragraph that shows what a fascist person should be like unlike Hitler's book excerpt that shows why and has examples of why the Aryan race should be dominate and, why he wants the Jews to perish. Benito states that a man should be active, be ready, importance of education and, the essential value of work. This is nothing compared to Hitler, who showed why the Aryan race should be dominate, ways to awaken a sentiment of nationality in large masses. The main topic that Benito talks about is why he wants a fascist state and not a pacifist and/or marxism. But Mussolini does state what Fascism does: dening happiness and that men should not be treated as mere animals.
In all accounts Hitler’s book is way more convincing. By showing examples of why he wants a fascist state, unlike Benito who was explaining why he rejected to other types of governments, but he does make a point that Fascism should not treat men as animals. But, I do believe that Hitler made his point more convincing than

Open Document