The Dinka And The Nuer Summary

776 Words2 Pages

Friendship to enemy; The Dinka and The Nuer The Dinka and the Nuer are two culturally similar ethnic groups that reside in Southern Sudan. Through time, they had changed not only culturally but also politically. Evan Pritchard introduces the Nuer and the Dinka to the western world as a simple cow herding society with a patrilineal structure, that centered around was defined by their kinship, extending networks and forming of political structures. The Dinka and the Nuer are an excellent example of Carl Schmitt’s dichotomy concept of friends and enemy, they represent how a culture can be altered based on what political nation state has the political power. Carl Schmitt discusses, the distinction between friend and enemy is collective. He is talking about “us versus them” not “one individual versus another. The Dinka and the Nuer formerly were a united structure that used intermarriage and social norms. They represented a political friendship, that though there was economic competition, …show more content…

The people known as the Nuer and the Dinka were particularly hostile to British takeover; as a result the British colonial authorities recruited the assistance of the anthropologist E. E. Evans-Pritchard. After British colonialism, and the introduction of Christianity and nation-states the Nuer and the Dinka social construct was heavily altered. British Christian missionaries was also a contributing factor to “civilizing” the natives, with the pressure from the missionaries, the british government used the Southern Policy to divided the south sudan region in to specific administrative districts, thus allowing for each tribe to a region of governance. The nature of this colonial system disrupted the natural movement and integration that was already in place, this further more caused tribal division between the Dinka and the

Open Document