Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty
features of parliamentary sovereignty
difference between uk constitution and us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty
The Differences Betweek the UK and US Constitutions
The constitution of a state, at its most basic, can be described as
the fundamental principles from which it is governed, usually defining
how power is split up within it and thereby constructing a framework
within which it operates (www.oed.com). In this essay, I will first
provide a brief summary of the UK and US constitutions and then
attempt to outline the key differences and similarities between the
two and discuss whether the differences really do pale in comparison
with the fundamental similarities.
Queen Elizabeth the 2nd once said, “The British constitution has
always puzzled me” (Hennessy, 1996) and this certainly becomes
understandable when studying it. The traditional UK constitution is
un-codified. This means that it lacks the primary source of a clear
written document and is derived solely from four sources- statute law
(laws made and passed by the government), common law (legal principles
which have been developed and applied by the courts), conventions
(rules of behaviour which are considered binding by those who operate
the constitution) and works of authority (these are written works used
for guidance on aspects of the constitution) (Jones et al., 2004).
Statute law has precedence over the other three sources. The
traditional constitution is therefore based upon four essential
components; 1.parliamentary sovereignty, which makes parliament the
supreme law making body and gives it the absolute legal right to make
the laws it chooses, 2. the rule of law, which says that laws must be
interpreted and applied by an impartial and independent jury with fair
trails ...
... middle of paper ...
...overnment/constitution-1.htm).
This is a huge difference to anything in the UK or US constitution
and, coming back to the title of this essay, the fact that there is
not such a major difference like this between the two shows that yes,
both the US and the UK constitution certainly do have fundamental
similarities.
Bibliography
* Hennessy (1996), The Hidden Wiring: Unearthing the British
Constitution, Gollancz
* Jones, Kavanagh, Moran, Norton, (2004), Politics UK, 5th Edition,
First Edition published 1991, Pearson Education Limited
* Singh (2003), Governing America, The Politics of a Divided
Democracy, Oxford University Press
* Websites: www.history.uk.com, www.iranonline.com, www.oed.com-
Oxford English Dictionary Online, www.statistics.gov.uk,
www.usgovinfo.about.com
Our ideas about laws and philosophy are borrowed from those of Justinian’s code, which was the main set of laws of the empire. For example, the Declaration of Independence says the “unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” (Doc. D) This is similar to the “maxims of law... to live honestly, to hurt
In 1918, while the rest of Europe was still engaged in World War I, a newly formed communist government was developing in Russia. Much like 18th century Americans, they had just managed to overthrow what was viewed as a tyrannical government and hoped to form a new nation free of the injustices of the previous rule. Both countries wrote a new constitution as well as a declaration of rights to facilitate this, but their respective documents had vast differences. These disparities stemmed from differences in the ideologies of the new governments. The primary objectives of the Russian Declaration of Rights of the Working and Exploited People and the later constitution were the “abolition of all exploitation of man by man, complete elimination of the division of society into classes, merciless suppression of the exploiters, socialist organization of society, and victory of socialism in all countries.” Americans wanted equality of opportunity and personal freedom instead of the social equality desired by the Russians. The American constitution and Bill of Rights were created to protect personal liberties and individual freedom while the Russians were more concerned with the welfare and equality of the population as a whole. This difference is partially due to the differences in the conditions leading to revolution in each country. The American Revolution was initiated by the wealthy in response to what they considered unfair treatment by a foreign ruler while the Russian revolution was instigated by the poor in reaction to centuries of oppression and exploitation by the wealthy within their own country.
The move from the Articles of Confederation to the United States Constitution caused several people to be unhappy. For 6 years the Articles weakened the United States in more ways than one. In the summer of 1787 a new form of government was created, a radical move from the Articles of Confederation.
a law made by God, called the Law of Reason. This law gives humankind liberty,
As stated in the first paper; The Constitution of the United States was designed to be a framework for the organization of our country’s government. Many foreign countries also have constitutions, which outline the rights of individuals and the powers of the law; such as the Iraqi Constitution of 2005. I will compare the similarities and differences of the US and Iraqi Constitutions and discuss Articles 2, 36, 39, & 90 and women’s rights of the Iraqi Constitution.
In conclusion, the world’s oldest and most structured set of laws were created to protect all
laws made by others in our society, and decide whether or not the laws we make
Law is a system of rules that are implemented throughout social establishments to govern behavior. A principle for judging acts as reasonable or unreasonable and they may seem objective, universal, and knowable, which dispositions are guide. Our function is rational activity, and our rational nature gives us dispositions when we are naturally disposed to seek to know, understand, and be
Law is what rules the lands and is a guideline in which the people follow for that is how society works and continues to prosper. Being able to, “test any particular measure that can be agreed upon as a law for people to impose upon themselves” (Kant, 55). This thinking of possible self imposed law is a way for the people at that moment in time can be able to dictate what they
The United States Constitution and Texas Constitution are similar, but not indistinguishable. One can see that the constitution was made to prevent tyranny in the states from the idea of the federalists who wanted to build a strong form of government that gave people rights without giving their representatives too much power. In the U.S. Constitution, the elites made the decision that they would form a representative government with a Bill of Rights in order for the anti-federalists to agree to sign. The constitution established a stronger form of government, which helped the economic and social tensions. The constitution consists of: the preamble, which states the general principles for a government, the Bill
In this essay I will be discussing how the formal theory of the rule of law is an erroneous means of establishing laws within a state. A central theme to addressing this is essay is the distinction between formal and substantive theories of the rule of law. In order to reach my conclusion of the formal theory being proven to be insufficient, one must first appreciate the significant advantages which the substantive theory obtains. However, before doing so, I will briefly mention the importance of the rule of law in society and the requirements it needs to fulfil.
The Differences Between the UK and US Constitutions The question requires us to see the difference between the UK and US constitutions of the political systems and then analyse whether there is actually a difference between the two. Constitution specifies the powers of the state and the institutions or offices, which have and excise state power. “A state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory” (Max Weber). There are two types of constitutions negative constitutions which goes beyond principles that are beyond people’s wishes this is common in the US constitution. Whereas the positive constitution is an example of the British constitutions constructed so that public wishes are kept.
The principle concern of the rule of law is to limit and discipline public power.The rule of law is adn ideal and a morden name for natural law.The rule of law is used in contradistinction to 'the rule of man' and 'rule according to law'.Even in most autocrartic form of government there is some law according to whic powers of government are exercised but it does not means that there is rule of law.Therefore ,the rule of law means that the law rules or
The concept of ‘the rule of law’ has been discussed by many. Professor Geoffrey Walker in his 1988 paper wrote ‘…most of the content of the rule of law can be summed up in two points: (1) that the people (including, one should add, the government) should be ruled by the law and obey it and (2) that the law should be such that people will be able (and, one should add, willing) to be guided by it’.
Law is one of the most important elements that transform humans from mere beasts into intelligent and special beings. Law tells us what is right and wrong and how we, humans, should act to achieve a peaceful society while enjoying individual freedoms. The key to a successful nation is a firm, strong, and fair code of high laws that provides equal and just freedom to all citizens of the country. A strong government is as important as a firm code of law as a government is a backbone of a country and of the laws. A government is a system that executes and determines its laws. As much as fair laws are important, a capable government that will not go corrupt and provide fair services holds a vital role in building and maintaining a strong country.