Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the effects of ballet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the effects of ballet
The Dancing Barber by AC Michael is a novel embedded with many intertwined stories. It narrates the time period after Ukraine was captured by the Soviet Union. The novel portrays the lives of people who escaped from Ukraine and how they tried to re-establish themselves. It also narrates the atrocities committed by the Soviet Union on the Ukrainian people. However, the main story revolves around a barber who is in the process of choreographing his dream ballet show but encounters a number of hazards and obstacles in his way. There are many characters in the book and all the characters have equal importance in the story. There is Taras, who makes his living as a barber but aspires to be a great ballet master. The author showed this character …show more content…
He is being helped in his endeavours by Taras’s wife Halyna. Halyna is the strongest and most likable character in the novel as it is she, who works hard to pay the bills and put the food on the table. It is she who takes a stand against her bully husband when he crosses the line. Hers is the only character whom I liked in this novel. There are many other characters also who have special roles in the book, like Halyna’s twin sisters and also a rich man named Ivan. These people also play a significant part in creating many mishaps in the plot. There are several other side characters like many ballet dancers including Halyna’s daughter Sofia. Overall I found the book too descriptive. The unnecessary dragging of plot induces boredom. At several places in the book, I felt that certain things are unnecessary explained. The author took a long time to evolve the plot and actual storyline. I have to drag myself from page to page in the initial chapters of the book because of the slow pace of the story. Though the choice of words was interesting in the start, the poor sentence structure ruined the effect of good vocabulary. Interactions between the characters were dull and instead of entertaining, they only served to aggravate the reader. I was very irritated with the frequent use of article ‘THE’ at inappropriate places in a lot of sentences. Though the author used it to show non-English speakers, I find that it hindered the flow of my reading and irritated me to no
The author chose to do all of these things because they all are crucial to the story, and they help to make the book better. They make it more interesting, less confusing, and more professional. All of these elements were probably well planned and thought out because they are so important. I think that the characters make the story good or bad, and that’s the author’s job - to create the characters and the ideas and things like that, and that’s why we’re doing this project: to evaluate what the author has presented with these characteristics.
Saul is the main character in this novel, and he is also the narrator. Saul is important because he is a positive and reassuring figure who represents strength, power, and will. There are many things that we, the readers can learn from him.
There are a few minor characters in the story. There’s Clarisse and there are the firemen. The firemen are only mentioned to give you a better perspective of their world. They are very obedient and don’t seem to have minds of their own. Their personalities are not shown and they don’t really play a significant role in the novel. Clarisse, however, is a big player. She is the reason that Montag decides to quit and print books instead. She is used to get things going and ignite the rebellion, but she is soon killed off. So, she doesn’t have a big enough role to be considered a major character. Most of the minor character4s are there to show contrast with some major characters. This way, you have a better insight as to who they really are.
I have a few dislikes about the book. My first dislike about the book is that it was full of vulgar language. I did not like the use of vulgar language in this book. I see no need in having it. Another dislike about the book is that it did not have any pictures. Pictures help people visualize what is happening in a story better.
My overall opinion of this book is good I really liked it and recommend it to anyone. It is a good book to read and it keep you interested throughout the whole book.
The characters are relatable. Carmen is the most thoughtful of the four friends, and recognizes the importance of friendship more than others do. Carmen is half Puerto Rican and half White, she lives with her single Latina mom. Throughout the book she has to deal with feeling replaced when she finds out that her dad is engaged to a white woman who already has two teenagers. Bridget is an athlete, she spends her summer at a soccer camp in Mexico. She is impulsive and reckless, but her high spirits help her make friends quickly. Lena is the shy one. She travels to Greece to spend the summer with her grandparents. She is quiet and happiest when she can just be alone. She's not much into boys, because through experience she's learned that they usually only like her for her looks. Finally there's Tibby, the rebel. The only one of the 4 girls stuck at home, she views it as plain and boring.
Criticisms (Unfavourable): Near the end of the book the dialogue becomes more rhetorical than the rest of the book. This isn’t really a problem, but can become slightly confusing at times. The best option would be to read this part slowly and carefully in order to understand what the message is.
The characters are worth describing because you will not know who I am talking about, unless you read the play. They also are important because they bring the flavor to this individual
The book was very well edited and it was clear that the author knew what he was doing. However, I personally had a problem with the pace of the stories. I found the suspense in certain scenes lacking. Many supposedly suspenseful moments just happened, almost out of the blue. They lacked a proper build-up to keep the readers on the edge of their seats.
Fans of the novel found that the way the novel is written, you never want to put it down and the action keeps things moving and is quite entertaining. The novel pulls you in and makes you love each of the main characters in it. This is a great series for anyone to read, and it is audience friendly for whoever reads them. There is quite a bit of suspense that will make the novel exceed readers 's expectations, and the twists and turns keeps you guessing and lets nothing be predictable. Some like the way this group of people bands together when they really need to and keep things together so they can all stop the
This book is a very interesting read, if you have some self discipline. I mean that you need some self discipline because this book didn’t really captivate me in the sense that I couldn’t put it down. But after reading it for a while, I started to appreciate the author’s way of describing the characters and actions in this book.
I like this book because there are a lot of plot twists, which is fun to read about because you do not become bored. This book is considered to be good because this story was well thought out and definitely is a good read. Something that could have been changed was that the author made some of the novel a little to descriptive and it was hard to follow along and not get lost. Other than that minor part, I did like this style of
Other people should read this book because it has interesting characters, humor and an interesting plot. Katherine is an uncharacteristic character from this time period. Baptista is a not very good father, and Tranio is a good actor for a servant. There are scenes that will have you on the floor in laughter. There are also weird plots twists.
Certain passages in the story are unnecessary. For example: “To make the best of things, the children spent the first half-hour picking up paper, plastic bags, cans, cigarette butts, and other trash from the meadow,” (Sapegin). This inclusion does not add any sort of importance to the book, instead it is uninteresting, and unneeded, and it takes away from what is actually occurring in the story. Continuing with this thought, I mentioned the choice/inclusion of certain descriptives lack in concern for the reader. For example: Sapegin included a whole section dedicated to explaining the activities Andy and his friends took on as he could no longer be around computers.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.