Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis on the book the curious incident of the dog in the night-time
The curious incident of the dog in the night time summary
Literary analysis on the book the curious incident of the dog in the night-time
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Learning disabilities have destroyed peoples’ self-esteem for the longest time, and unfortunately everyone has them, large or small. In the novel, The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon, the main character Christopher experiences learning disabilities and explains how it affects him throughout the book. The idea that everyone has learning disabilities is clearly shown through Chris, his father, Mrs. Peters, Siobhan, and is also proven true with myself. Chris’s inability to understand jokes hinders him from learning because some learning comes from humor. At the beginning of the novel, he immediately opens himself up. He explains,
“This will not be a funny book. I cannot tell jokes because I do not understand them. If I try to say the joke to myself, making the word mean the three different things at the same, it is like hearing three different pieces of music at the same time, which is uncomfortable and confusing and not nice like white
…show more content…
Peters, and Siobhan. When Chris is talking about learning
Baker 2
disabilities, there is an entire paragraph dedicated to pointing out disabilities that the people who he is most comfortable with. It reads,
“Everyone has special needs, like Father, who has to carry a little packet of artificial sweetening tablets around with him to put in his coffee to stop him from getting fat, or Mrs. Peters, who wears a beige-colored hearing aid, or Siobhan, who has glass so thick they give you a headache if you borrow them, and none of these people are Special Needs, even if they have special needs.” (Haddon Pg. 43)
He explains all the problems these people have in an attempt to make himself feel better and to prove his point about everyone having learning disabilities. This paragraph in the novel is crucial to his point and demonstrates how he can see the struggles that others go
Upon the arrival of his wife’s friend, the husband is ultimately uncomfortable around Robert because he does not know how to communicate with or act around him. His discomfort is revealed when Robert and his wife were sharing their experiences “about the major things that had come to pass for them in the past ten years” (367). He felt it was necessary to join in because he thought Robert would “think [he] left the room and didn’t want [his wife] to think [he] was feeling left out” (367). It is obvious the husband is overly involved with Robert’s handicap and fails to see him as a person with his own thoughts and ideas.
“Morreall argues that, if we want to answer these questions, we shouldn’t focus on whether the joke happens to trade on a stereotype. Instead, he takes the primary problem with some humor to be that it involves disengaging from things with which we ought to be engaged.” (Morreall, 529)
3. In the story, what is the purpose of 'handicaps' and how do they keep people equal?
The novel The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time explores the concept of truth and lies through the eyes of Christopher, the main character, who has autism. His narrative perspective only allows the reader to understand what his own mind is capable of understanding such as his views on lying, facial
Harrison Bergeron’s mother, Hazel Bergeron, is the definition of the Handicapper General’s “normal” and model for enforced equality. Everyone must be leveled and thereby oppressed to her standards. Hazel’s husband, George Bergeron, is no exception. “‘I’d think it would be real interesting, hearing all the different sounds,’ said Hazel, a little envious. ‘All the things they think up.’” (Vonnegut 910). George suffers from his own comically ludicrous mental handicap. The fact that this incites jealousy in Hazel reaffirms the artificial equality Vonnegut ridicules. The author satirizes oppression in American society through his depictions of misery and restraint exhibited in his characters’ ordeals. “The different times that George is interrupted from thinking, and his inner monologue is cut, we have a sort of stopping his having dialogue with himself. So he can’t have a unique personality, which itself involves his worldviews” (Joodaki 71). Not being able to know oneself epitomizes
In the beginning of the book, the author talks about deafness. He believe that deafness is not something that should be looked down upon. His beliefs people reduce their thoughts about people with disabilities. He talks about other beliefs on deafness and hard of hearing. Mark experience difficulties within his work place as well as school, early life, and relationships. In the workplace, Mark felt insecure and like he could not obtain a job in any other field
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time is told through the eyes of a fifteen year old boy named Christopher Boone. Christopher has a highly-functioning form of autism which allows him to understand complex mathematical problems, but also leaves him unable to comprehend many simple human emotions. His inability to understand metaphors, distinguish emotions, and his lack of imagination makes it possible to consider Christopher as functioning like a computer rather than functioning as a human being. Throughout the story, Christopher is faced with many challenges which he conquers using the stable and never changing system of mathematics. All of these factors suggest that Christopher does, in fact, function like a computer, but it is apparent early in the story that Christopher, regardless of anything else, is capable of independent thought which separates him from the programmed, dependent world of computers.
“You can either allow the obstacles in your life to be the excuse for your failure or make them the reason behind your success.” Although the quote’s author is unknown, anyone can connect to this quote in some way about how you can let obstacles stop you from doing what you want to do or you can use them as a reason for success. This holds true for Christopher, the main protagonist in the novel The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon. Christopher is a 15-year-old in the autism spectrum, and although gifted in mathematics, he struggles with communicating and has extreme likes and dislikes. These obstacles definitely make it seem as if his goals are far from reach and as secrets come out his success seems almost unattainable, but because of these hardships he learns many lessons about human nature and himself, including that deciphering facial expressions to find the emotions connected to them and that he is capable of doing anything regardless of the obstacles thrown at him.
...he needs of the disabled because it fails to adjust by removing those impediments. If society provides what the disabled people need, then they will be able to participate in normal activities, and people will not focus on their disability. Grealy mentions “Society is no help. It tells us again and again that we can most be ourselves by acting and looking like someone else, only to leave our original faces behinds to turn in ghosts that will inevitably resent and haunt us”, which Lucy views herself from the socio-political model perspective. She believes that she can be better if the society provides her with what she needs. In her opinion, she requires medical attention for her reconstructions, and she expects to get this in her country. She is forced to move to the London to take advantage of the medical coverage there when she can no longer do so in her country.
So it becomes important to understand whether or not disability books become more about the able-bodied readers or about the readers who have the same experiences as the characters. The problem with presenting the book as a text for able-bodied children is that the character with a disability becomes a part of the “second fiddle phenomenon” where they are only there to make a change in another character (Brittain; Carroll and Rosenblum; Keith; Curwood). Rather, the character with a disability “[serves] to bring the central character/s to a better understanding of themselves or disability” (Brittain). In Cynthia Lord’s Rules, twelve-year old Catherine learns how to accept disability and learns more about herself through her interactions with her brother, David who is autistic, and new friend Jason, who is in a wheelchair and cannot speak. During her experiences with Jason and David, she comes to terms with her own self-doubt. Should characters with disabilities should be portrayed with both audiences in mind, or can there only be one or the
In the book, The Short Bus, Jonathan Mooney’s thesis is that there is more to people than their disabilities, it is not restricting nor is it shameful but infact it is beautiful in its own way. With a plan to travel the United States, Mooney decides to travel in a Short bus with intentions of collecting experiences from people who have overcome--or not overcome--being labeled disabled or abnormal. In this Mooney reinvents this concept that normal people suck; that a simple small message of “you’re not normal” could have a destructive and deteriorating effect. With an idea of what disabilities are, Mooney’s trip gives light to disabilities even he was not prepared to face, that he feared.
In the beginning of the article, Lukianoff and Haidt explain how one word can offend a college student really quickly, even if the person saying it didn’t intend to insult them. The authors then tell the audience how popular comedians, like Chris Rock, have stopped performing on college campuses, because the students cannot take a joke.
Instead of addressing the fact that Laura has a disability, Amanda ignores it. Amanda expects Laura to have many gentleman callers, like she did. In reality, Laura is shy and self conscious, because she has not gotten over her minor disability. Amanda does not help Laura overcome her disability but denies it, and gives in to the illusion that Laura is okay. “Why, you’re not crippled, you just have a little defect--hardly noticeable, even (1.2.17)!” Laura’s disability drove her to miss class every day and go to the park. This created the illusion for her mother that she was getting an education, but in reality she was ditching
For some, the punchline to this joke falls flat. Others react with shock and disgust. Finding a listener who both understand the joke and thinks that it is funny is quite difficult, but immensely rewarding. Before explaining the format of the joke, or why anyone would find it funny, the requisite knowledge for understanding it needs to be explained.
The joke is more of a spontaneous joke pattern because people have to recognize that it is a joke. There is no set pattern to how the joke will go. Douglas focuses on Freud’s definition of a joke more so in the article because it plays more on the role on the subconscious. To Freud what makes jokes funny is that it is about the relaxation of the conscious control in favor of the subconscious. For the joke it may be funny to some people because they can just image what that scale would