The Crucible Reflective Essay

497 Words1 Page

Arthur Miller’s The Crucible (1953) was written against the backdrop of the communist witch-hunts. Miller drew parallels between the 1692 Salem witch trials and Joseph McCarthy’s communist-crackdown to create a society of tension and fear. In both dystopian situations, a misguided judicial and political system skewed the social perspective. The courts condemned individuals upon evidence that was false; yet, no sense of wrongdoing was felt. The religiously intolerant society of Salem sought to enforce theocratic rule and suppress freedom of opinion. From a philosophical standpoint, a systematic analysis of the morals and ethics underpinning the Salem society will lead to a discerning understanding of the play. In addressing the Ethics Center, IQ2 and the QCAA, it will be argued today that a mandatory inclusion of the Crucible is crucially vital as it prompts reflections on larger human concerns by extend thinking beyond one’s own experience and educates students about ethics and morality in society.

The Crucible must be kept in the QCAA curriculum as it educates students about the morality of their decisions. This would enable a more compressive understanding, leading to …show more content…

Through the actions of the characters, students are able to learn valuable lessons. In modern society, not enough books teach students about the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior. Having a firm set of principles to guide your life and the choices you make is what ethics is all about. The crucible offers different perspective on people’s interpretations of ethics and society. The Salem society valued theocratic beliefs above the law. Some characters sacrificed their integrity to keep aligned with their beliefs. The lesson that students should learn from the Crucible is that a combination of beliefs, integrity and obedience of the law is required in order to be an ethical member of

Open Document