The Controversy: The Royal Academy Of Art In France

458 Words1 Page

The Royal Academy of art in France and its counterpart in Great Britain were established in the mid-1600s, and since that time they had a monopoly on the styles and the tastes. They sponsored the Salon, which was an official art exhibition. The jury of the Salon decided which kinds of artworks should be exhibited, and in many times the jury was arbitrary. (Rosenfeld, 2004). The Royal Academy considered the history paintings to be the only great art, and they set the standards of the taste and the style in that era according to this point of view. Hence, and due to their specific rules, many great works were rejected. That situation and the standards of tastes led the impressionist artists to be the first to establish their own exhibition away from the Salon in the late 1800s. So, the Royal Academy slowly declined, and its monopoly on artistic styles ended. …show more content…

In these days, the situation is much different than that era as there are many museums, galleries, and fairs of art. Some of them are state-sponsored, and some are funded by art associations. Also, many artists became able to open their own galleries, where they could exhibit their works for the public to see them and value them. Also, art schools, many commercial or charitable organizations can arrange for such fairs. For the state-sponsored galleries, there are, for sure, a specialized committee to determine what to be exhibited or not and to put the laws about the allowed subjects. On the other hand, if the gallery was to show the works of specific artist or group of the same school, there will not be determined subjects, tastes and styles as in this case, artists tend to show more diversity. Thus, with all those individuals, authorities and institutions, I do not think that there is a specific group to set the artistic styles and tastes as the people have more varied tastes than

More about The Controversy: The Royal Academy Of Art In France

Open Document