The Civil Rights Movement: Reform Or Revolution?

708 Words2 Pages

Reform or Revolution? The Civil Rights movement was in fact a reform not a revolution. The definition of a reform is to make a change in something, often political, social, or economic, in order to improve it. While the definition of a revolution is an uprising started to overthrow a whole political system. Almost all the time revolutions are considered violent and short lived. Even though the Civil Rights movement was extremely dangerous the movement wasn’t started to completely wipe the United States political system, but to change the rights of the country's minorities in order for them to be equal with your everyday white man. From the 1950’s to the 1960’s the Civil Rights movement was in full effect with hundreds of protests and marches organized by many different activist groups. The reason the Civil Rights was a reform can be supported in many ways. One example would be the March on Washington. On August 28, 1963 over 250,000 people of different races and social classes gathered to support Martin Luther King Jr. as he …show more content…

The American Revolution was started by the thirteen original colonies in order the break away from the british monarchy and to create their own political system. It was a very bloody fight that included thousands of deaths. Even though in most cases the protests of the Civil Rights were also very violent and many were killed through the course of the movement the end results were completely different. In a previous statement I said that the American Revolution aimed to create their own government away from Great Britain when on the other hand the Civil Rights movement did not aim to create a new government strictly for African Americans, but to change it so it accommodated their needs too. This is how the American Revolution ( a revolution) differs from the Civil Rights movement ( a

Open Document